| Literature DB >> 33173430 |
Yun Liang1, Xiaoqin Li2, Xingsheng Hu3, Bing Wen4, Liang Wang1, Cheng Wang1.
Abstract
Objective: Based on epidemiological field data, this study was to develop a prediction model which can be used as a preliminary screening tool to identify pregnant women who were at high risk of offspring congenital heart disease (CHD) in Nanchong City, and be beneficial in guiding prenatal management and prevention.Entities:
Keywords: case-control matching; congenital heart disease; risk factors; risk model
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33173430 PMCID: PMC7646101 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.48046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Case-Control Matching Statistics
| Match Type | Count |
|---|---|
| Exact Matches | 93 |
| Fuzzy Matches | 234 |
| Unmatched Including Missing Keys | 40 |
| Unmatched With Valid Keys | 40 |
| Sampling | Without Replacement |
| Log File | None |
| Maximize Matching Performance | Yes |
Case-Control Match Tolerances
| Match Variables | Value | Fuzzy Match Attempts | Incremental Rejection Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exact (All Variables) | 466.3000 | 98.006 | |
| Gestational Age | 1.000 | 4570.000 | 90.263 |
| Maternal Age of Pregnancy | 0.000 | 445.000 | 47.416 |
Univariate analysis of research factors among cases and controls
| Research factors | Controls (N=327) | Cases (N=327) | χ2 value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | |||
| 0.646 | 0.421 | |||||
| Rural area | 80 | 75.5 | 89 | 27.2 | ||
| Downtown | 247 | 24.5 | 238 | 72.8 | ||
| 0.358 | 0.549 | |||||
| Han | 262 | 80.1 | 268 | 82.0 | ||
| Minorities | 65 | 19.9 | 59 | 18.0 | ||
| 9.100 | 0.011 | |||||
| Primary school and below | 45 | 13.8 | 44 | 13.5 | ||
| Middle school | 76 | 23.2 | 110 | 33.6 | ||
| College and above | 206 | 63.0 | 173 | 52.9 | ||
| 8.203 | 0.004 | |||||
| None | 299 | 91.4 | 275 | 84.1 | ||
| Yes | 28 | 8.6 | 52 | 15.9 | ||
| 4.098 | 0.043 | |||||
| None | 290 | 88.7 | 272 | 83.2 | ||
| Yes | 37 | 11.3 | 55 | 16.8 | ||
| 4.310 | 0.230 | |||||
| Thin (≤18.4) | 36a | 11.0 | 45a | 13.8 | ||
| Normal (18.5-23.9) | 192a | 58.7 | 171a | 52.3 | ||
| Overweight (24.0-27.9) | 90a | 27.5 | 95a | 29.1 | ||
| Obese (≥28.0) | 9a | 2.8 | 16a | 4.9 | ||
| 10.910 | 0.001 | |||||
| None | 267 | 81.7 | 231 | 70.6 | ||
| Yes | 60 | 18.3 | 96 | 29.4 | ||
| 8.724 | 0.003 | |||||
| None | 318 | 97.2 | 301 | 92.0 | ||
| Yes | 9 | 2.8 | 26 | 8.0 | ||
| 8.402 | 0.004 | |||||
| None | 262 | 80.1 | 230 | 70.3 | ||
| Yes | 65 | 19.9 | 97 | 29.7 | ||
| 7.618 | 0.022 | |||||
| None | 104 | 31.8 | 85 | 27.8 | ||
| Yes | 223 | 68.2 | 247 | 72.2 | ||
| 2.810 | 0.094 | |||||
| None | 300 | 91.7 | 287 | 87.8 | ||
| Yes | 27 | 8.3 | 40 | 12.2 | ||
| 6.146 | 0.013 | |||||
| None | 310 | 94.8 | 288 | 89.6 | ||
| Yes | 17 | 5.2 | 34 | 10.4 | ||
| 7.181 | 0.007 | |||||
| None | 318 | 97.2 | 303 | 92.7 | ||
| Yes | 9 | 2.8 | 24 | 7.3 | ||
| 2.353 | 0.125 | |||||
| None | 285 | 87.2 | 271 | 82.9 | ||
| Yes | 42 | 12.8 | 56 | 17.1 | ||
| 3.570 | 0.059 | |||||
| None | 274 | 83.8 | 255 | 78.0 | ||
| Yes | 53 | 16.2 | 72 | 22.0 | ||
| 22.731 | 0.000 | |||||
| None | 305 | 93.3 | 264 | 80.7 | ||
| Yes | 22 | 6.7 | 63 | 19.3 | ||
| 6.498 | 0.039 | |||||
| None | 294 | 89.9 | 278 | 85.0 | ||
| Yes | 33 | 10.1 | 49 | 15.0 | ||
| 11.779 | 0.001 | |||||
| None | 275 | 84.1 | 239 | 73.1 | ||
| Yes | 52 | 15.9 | 88 | 26.9 | ||
| 11.422 | 0.003 | |||||
| None | 300 | 91.7 | 272 | 83.2 | ||
| Yes | 27 | 8.3 | 55 | 16.8 | ||
| 0.914 | 0.339 | |||||
| None | 320 | 97.9 | 316 | 96.6 | ||
| Yes | 7 | 2.1 | 11 | 3.4 | ||
| 4.407 | 0.036 | |||||
| None | 310 | 94.8 | 293 | 90.5 | ||
| Yes | 17 | 5.2 | 29 | 9.5 | ||
| 56.652 | 0.000 | |||||
| None | 245 | 74.9 | 156 | 48.4 | ||
| Yes | 82 | 25.1 | 171 | 52.3 | ||
| 14.371 | 0.000 | |||||
| None | 180 | 55.0 | 227 | 69.4 | ||
| Yes | 147 | 45.0 | 100 | 30.6 | ||
| 4.155 | 0.042 | |||||
| None | 139 | 42.5 | 165 | 50.5 | ||
| Yes | 188 | 57.5 | 162 | 49.5 | ||
Note: BMI: Body mass index;
*Statistically significant after univariate analysis with a test criterion of 0.05; Each subscript letter denoted a subset of categories whose column proportions do not differ significantly from each other at the 0.05 level.
Results of multivariate conditional logistic analysis
| Factor | B | S.E | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respiratory infections | 0.686 | 0.202 | 0.001 | 1.986 | 1.336~2.952 |
| Exposure to polluted water | 1.176 | 0.280 | 0.000 | 3.242 | 1.872~5.613 |
| Adverse emotions during pregnancy | 1.019 | 0.165 | 0.000 | 2.769 | 2.005~3.824 |
| Nutrition supplementation | -0.617 | 0.182 | 0.001 | 0.540 | 0.381~0.765 |
| Constant | -2.871 | 0.556 | 0.000 | 0.057 |
Note: B: Beta; S.E: standard error; OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.