Patient Delay and Contributing Factors Among Breast Cancer Patients at Two Cancer Referral Centres in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Unlike developed countries, there is high mortality of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries associated with prolonged patient delays and advanced stage presentations. However, evidence-based information about patient delay in presentation and contributing factors to diagnosis of breast cancer in Ethiopia is scarce.
METHODS: Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at oncology units of the University of Gondar and Felege Hiwot specialized hospitals. A total of 371 female breast cancer patients who were newly diagnosed from September 2019 to April 30, 2020 were included. Data were entered using EPI info version 7.2 and analyzed in SPSS version 23. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize socio-demographic and clinical characteristic of the patients. Multivariable logistic regression at a P-value<0.05 significance level was used to identify predictors of patient delay.
RESULTS: A total of 281 (75.7%) patients had long patient delay of ≥90 days (3 months) with the average patient delay time of 8 months, and advanced stage diagnosis was found on 264 (71.2%) of patients. The median age of patients was 40 years. Rural residence (AOR=3.72; 95% CI=1.82-7.61), illiterate (AOR=3.8; 95% CI=1.71-8.64), having a painless wound (AOR=3.32; 95% CI=1.93, 5.72), travel distance ≥5 km (AOR=1.66; 95% CI=1.09-3.00), having no lump/swelling in the armpit (AOR=6.16; 95% CI=2.80-13.54), and no history of any breast problem before (AOR=2.46; 95% CI=(1.43-4.22) were predictors for long patient delay.
CONCLUSION: Long patient delay and advanced stage diagnosis of breast cancer are higher in our study. Travel distance ≥5 km, rural residence, no history of any breast problem before, having no lump/swelling in the arm pit, a painless lump in the breast, and being illiterate were important predictors for patient delay. Therefore, public awareness programs about breast cancer should be designed to prevent patient delay in presentation and to promote early detection of cases before advancement.

Background

Cancer is a major non-communicable disease with high global public health burden globally. It is the third leading cause of death in low- and middle-income countries.1 Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers, which affects mostly women.2 The mortality statistics showthat Africa had the highest breast cancer mortality rate in the world and rising incidence of the disease.3 Almost half of breast cancer cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).4

The incidence of new breast cancer cases in Ethiopia is now increasing and it has become the most prevalent tumor among women with an estimated incidence rate of 43 cases per 100,000 women. According to the national cancer registry report, breast cancer accounts for 30.2% of all cancer cases in the country with an upward increase in trend.5,6

Despite the rising burden of breast cancer cases globally, delayed diagnosis and late stage presentation are common problems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.7 Although early diagnosis of breast cancer results in improvements in survival and mortality from the disease, many health systems in low- and middle-income countries faced challenges to manage the burden due to little community awareness and poor diagnostic and treatment services.8,9

The major contributing factor mentioned for advanced stage diagnosis in developing countries is delayed presentation to health facilities after the disease has progressed. However, breast cancer is often diagnosed at an early stage and the prognosis is good in high-income countries.7,10

A study conducted in urban South Africa found that the most common stage among breast cancer patients was Stage 3 (55%), and T4 tumor (30.5%).11 Similarly a study in Nigeria reported that 67.3% of breast cancer patients were diagnosed at advanced stage and 76.4% had invasive ductal carcinoma.12

Several factors have been found to contribute to a delay in diagnosis of breast cancer which are either from patients or healthcare related factors. Two systematic reviews in Africa revealed that lack of knowledge, negative symptom interpretation, beliefs in traditional medicine, lack of trust and access in healthcare were some of the factors for patient delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer among African women.13,14 The average times between symptom recognition and presentation to a healthcare provider ranged from less than 3 to greater than 6 months in sub-Saharan Africa. Some of the reasons mentioned for patient delay in presentation were low educational level, lack of breast cancer awareness, and poor knowledge of early-detection methods, type of initial symptoms: painless, not taken seriously, or hoping they would resolve soon, fear of the disease and its treatment (eg, mastectomy) or death, or of being a burden to the family, belief in traditional medicine or spiritual cures; financial constraints; and poor access to healthcare.15

A study in China found that the range of patient delay was 0.2–900 days, with a median patient delay of 50 days. A total of 35.8% of patients waited ≥90 days to access medical treatment after symptom onset. The study showed that the main predictors of patient delay were knowledge of breast cancer symptoms, breast self-examination/physical examination, perceived health competence, family support, pain stimulation, and age.16

A meta-analysis in Africa found the overall summary estimate of late presentation (>90 days) was 54% and was worst in the eastern and central regions. Symptom misinterpretation (50%) followed by fear (17%), preference for alternative care (10%), and social influence were the major factors for patient delay.17 There are limited oncology centers in Ethiopia with only one radiotherapy center to serve more than 100 million population of the country, which is inaccessible to the majority of the rural population. The main focus of the government and healthcare systems were towards other infectious diseases than cancer until recent years. As a result, the majority of reported cases of breast cancer have delayed presentations and most of the patients have an incurable disease.18,19

However the magnitude and factors contributing to patient delay for presentation to a healthcare facility on breast cancer remains an area where strong evidence is lacking in the country in general and the region in particular, since some of the available reports are based on the only oncology and radiotherapy center at Addis Ababa, which may not be representative of the majority of the rural population. In addition, the factors for patient delay in presentation vary from region-to-region depending on the socio-cultural and healthcare system differences. Therefore this study was aimed to assess patient delay and contributing factors among breast cancer patients diagnosed at the only two oncology referral centers in Amhara region, North-western Ethiopia.

Methods

Study Design, Area, and Population

This study was an institution based cross-sectional study carried out in the two oncology centers (Felege Hiwot, and University of Gondar specialized hospitals) in Northwest Ethiopia from September 2019 to April, 30 2020. The hospitals are used as the only oncology referral centers for all cancer cases, including breast cancer in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Felege Hiwot referral hospital is found in Bahirdar city 565 km from Addis Ababa (the capital city of Ethiopia). The hospital serves more than 10 million people in its catchment area and is used as a teaching hospital for medical and health science students. The hospital currently provides diagnostic, surgical, and chemotherapy treatment services for cancer patients, including breast cancer.

University of Gondar hospital is a comprehensive specialized and teaching hospital found 737 km from the capital city of Ethiopia (Addis Ababa). More than 450,000 people visit the hospital every year for different health services. It is a 400-bed university hospital and serves a population of more than seven million across the region. The hospital has a separate oncology unit which provides diagnostics, treatment, and palliative care for breast cancer patients referred from different corners of the region. As a university hospital, it plays an important role in teaching medical and other health science students in different streams and specialities including oncology. The hospital also refers cases to Addis Ababa for radiotherapy after initial treatment.

Sample Size, Measurements, and Data Collection Procedures

The study subjects were all breast cancer patients’ newly diagnosed from September 2019 to April 30, 2020 at the selected hospitals. All breast patients who had pathologically confirmed breast cancer were included in the study. The data was collected using structured and pre-tested questionnaires which were developed after a review of relevant literature and other materials that can address the objectives of the study.15,20–22 The questionnaire was prepared in the English version and translated to the local language (Amharic) to facilitate communication. The components of the questionnaires were introductory and demographic information, patient’s history on diagnostic pathway, medical and family history, dates of all important time points (eg, first symptom discovery until first healthcare contact and other behavioral factors of the patients. Information on stage at diagnosis and tumor characteristics was collected from patient’s records (see ).

Patients were retrospectively asked about breast cancer diagnosis journey events from their first initial symptom recognition to their first healthcare visit. Patients were encouraged to remember important time points such as the time when they recognize the first breast abnormalities, the time when they first visit healthcare. We tried to make the patients remember the dates in relation to known calendars like holidays, New Year, etc. The data collectors were four BSC nurses who are working in the oncology unit of selected hospitals since they know the study area very well and are expected to be honest and diligent, and willing to face difficulties that may arise during the process of interviewing. Two supervisors were recruited for supervising the data collectors in each of the selected hospitals.

Delayed diagnosis can be categorized into patient delay and provider delay or health system delay. The patient delay time was defined from a patient first becoming aware of symptoms until their first medical consultation and it was categorized as more than or equal to 3 months (≥90 days): long patient delay, and less than 3 months (<90 days): short patient delay.16,20,21

Information on tumor size (T) and nodal status (N) was used to derive stage by the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system AJCC (7th edition). All laboratory investigation and surgical findings were used to stage the disease. Stage 1 (T1N0); stage 2 (IIA=T0N1, T1N1, & T2N0, IIB=T2N1, & T3N0), and stage 3 (IIIA=T0N2, T1N2, T2N2, T3N1, & T3N2, IIIB=T4N0, T4N1, T4N2, IIIC=Ant TN3), and stage 4 (any T, any N, and M1).23

Patients diagnosed with breast cancer stage III and IV were defined as advanced stages and patients diagnosed with breast cancer stage I and II were considered as early stages.13,20

To assure the quality of the data, a structured and pre-tested questionnaire was used which was prepared in a simple and easily understandable language. One day training was given for data collectors and supervisors before data collection. Strict supervision and monitoring was done during data collection.

Data Processing and Analysis Procedures

Data was coded and entered using EPI info version 7.2 and exported to SPSS version 23 for further analysis. Before and during data processing the information was checked for completeness and internal consistency. It was verified that all the totals correspond to the total number of participants and checked by running simple frequencies in SPSS for all the variables.

The analyses were verified using descriptive interpretation for demographic, socio-economic and clinical characteristics of the study participants using frequencies and other summary statistics. Binary logistic regression was used to measure the association of each covariate with outcome variable. In addition, factors that were associated with outcome variable at p-value<0.05 significance level were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis to control the potential confounders. The result of the final model was expressed in terms of Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and Statistical significance was declared at a P-value less than 0.05.

Ethical Consideration

Ethical approval was obtained from the research ethics committee of Debre Tabor University. Following the endorsement by the research ethics committee, the selected hospitals were informed about the study through a Support letter. Concerned bodies in the selected hospitals were briefed about the study before the start of data collection. Informed verbal consent was obtained from study participants which was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Debre Tabor University, and that this study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Confidentiality of information and privacy of participants’ interview was respected.

Results

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Breast Cancer Patients

A total of 371 breast cancer patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and participated in the study. More than half (288, 77.6%) of the breast cancer patients were above 40 years. The median age of patients at diagnosis was 40 years (interquartile range=30–70). More than two thirds (249, 67.1%) of breast cancer patients were from rural residence. About 136 (36.7%) of women were illiterate (Table 1).

Table 1

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Breast Cancer Patients at Two Cancer Referral Centers in Northwest Ethiopia, 2020

Characteristics	Frequency (n=371)	Percentage
Age group
<40	83	22.4
≥40	288	77.6
Mean	48.1
Home residence
Rural	249	67.1
Urban	122	32.9
Marital status
Married	298	80.3
Single	73	19.7
Religion
Orthodox	172	46.4
Muslim	96	25.9
Protestant	97	26.1
Catholic	6	1.6
Educational status
Illiterate	136	36.7
Primary education	153	41.2
Secondary education and above	82	22.1
Occupational status
Housewife	215	58.0
Farmer	94	25.3
Government employee	52	14.0
Other	10	2.7
Distance to the health facility
<5 km	163	43.9
≥5 km	208	56.1

Clinical Characteristics of Breast Cancer Patients

Among the breast cancer patients, the majority (209, 56.3%) were premenopausal women. About 74 (19.9%) had a family history of breast cancer and 11 (3%) patients were HIV positive. Among the patients, 142 (38.3%) had a history of comorbidities. More than three quarters (328, 88.4%) of breast cancer patients had a breast lump, and 161 (43.4%) had a painful wound on the breast at presentation. The most common reasons mentioned for late presentation to the health facility were lack of awareness about early symptoms of breast cancer (345, 92.9%), use of traditional and spiritual treatment options (286, 77.1%), and financial problems for medical care and transport costs (217, 58.5%) (Table 2).

Table 2

Clinical Characteristics of Breast Cancer Patients at Two Cancer Referral Centers in Northwest Ethiopia, 2020

Characteristics	Frequency (n=371)	Percentage
Menopausal status
Pre-Menopausal	209	56.3
Menopausal	69	18.6
Post-Menopausal	93	25.1
HIV status
Negative	360	97.0
Positive	11	3.0
Family history of breast cancer
Yes	74	19.9
No	297	80.1
History of any breast problem before
Yes	138	37.2
No	233	62.8
Practicing breast self-examination
Yes	45	12.1
No	326	87.9
History of any comorbidities
Yes	142	38.3
No	229	61.7
Use of traditional treatment
Yes	256	69.0
No	115	31.0
Presenting chief compliant
Breast lump or mass	328	88.4
Swelling or lump in armpit	38	10.2
Painful wound	161	43.4
Other*	12	3.2
Method of detection of symptoms
Accidentally	248	66.8
During breast feeding	57	15.4
During breast self-examination	43	11.6
Other**	23	6.2
Patient reason for late presentation
Lack of awareness about early symptoms	345	92.9
Relating symptoms with other medical problems	132	35.6
Belief that breast cancer has not any medical treatment	88	23.7
Use of traditional and spiritual treatment options	286	77.1
Financial problems	217	58.5
Others***	35	9.4

Notes: * nipple retraction, nipple discharge, skin color change;** when produce discharge, and pain; *** fear of surgery (loss of breast), lack of trust of HCP.

Tumor Characteristics of Breast Cancer Patients

More than two thirds (320, 86.3%) of the patients had presented with tumor which involved axillary lymph node. More than half (209, 56.3%) of the patients had a tumor size of more than 5 cm. The mean (±SD) tumor size at diagnosis was 6±4 cm. Almost all patients (347, 93.5%) had invasive ductal carcinoma. Lobular carcinoma was found only on 18 (4.9%) patients. The result showed that about 140 (45.6%) patients had poorly differentiated invasive carcinoma (grade III tumor) and 128 (41.7%) had moderately differentiated invasive carcinoma (grade II tumor) (Table 3).

Table 3

Tumor Characteristics of Breast Cancer Patients at Two Cancer Referral Centers in Northwest Ethiopia, 2020

Characteristics	Frequency	Percentage
Axillary lymph node status
Positive	320	86.3
Negative	51	13.7
Tumor metastases to other body parts
Yes	53	14.3
No	318	85.7
Type of tumor
Ductal	347	93.5
Lobular	18	4.9
Other*	6	1.6
Tumor size in cm
≤5 cm	162	43.7
>5 cm	209	56.3
Median±IQR	6.3±3.1 cm
Tumor grade (n=307)
Grade I	39	12.7
Grade II	128	41.7
Grade III	140	45.6
Patient had taken any treatment
Yes	364	98.1
No	7	1.9
Type of treatment the patient had taken
Surgery	357	96.2
Chemotherapy	163	43.9
Hormonal therapy	50	13.5
Other**	4	1.1

Notes: * mixed tumors and inflammatory carcinoma’s. ** radiotherapy and other systemic treatments for underlying disease.

Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.

Breast Cancer Patients’ Medical Care Pathway

A total of 281 (75.7%) breast cancer patients had long patient delay ≥90 days (3 months). The average patient delay time was 8 months, with a range of 2 weeks to 3 years. A significantly higher proportion (211, 79.9%) of patients who were diagnosed at late stage (stage II&IV) had long patient delay of more than 3 months (P=0.0003). The larger proportion (191, 66.3%) of patients who were age ≥40 years had longer patient delay as compared with those less than 40 years old (40, 48.2%) (P=0.015). A higher proportion (234, 75.5%) of married women had significantly longer presentation delay to present to a health facility (P=0.007). A significantly large proportion (113, 83.1%) of illiterate women had longer patient delay than those who had primary (107, 69.9%) and secondary and above educational levels (61, 74.4%) (P<0.001).

Women who did not have history of any breast problem before (190, 81.5%) had longer patient delay than their counterparts (91, 65.9%) (P=0.0004). The majority of women (185, 88.9%) who travel more than 5 km distance to arrive at the nearby health facility had longer patient delay than who travel less than 5 km (96, 58.9%) (P<0.001) (Table 4).

Table 4

Association Between Socio-Demographic and Clinical Characteristics with Patient Delay at Two Cancer Referral Centers in Northwest Ethiopia, 2020

Characteristics	Frequency (n, %)	Patient Delay		χ2	P-value
		≥3 Months	<3 Months
Age group
<40	83	40 (48.2%)	43 (51.8%)	9.0	0.015*
≥40	288	191 (66.3%)	97 (33.7%)
Home residence
Rural	249	217 (87.2%)	32 (12.8%)	53	<0.001*
Urban	122	64 (52.5%)	58 (47.5%)
Marital status
Married	298	234 (75.5%)	64 (21.5%)	6.3	0.007*
Single	73	47 (64.4%)	26 (35.6%)
Educational status
Illiterate	136	113 (83.1%)	23 (196.9%)	23.6	<0.001*
Primary education	153	107 (69.9%)	46 (30.1%)
Secondary education and above	82	61 (74.4%)	21 (25.6%)
Travel distance
<5 km	163	96 (58.9%)	67 (41.1%)	44.9	<0.001*
≥5 km	208	185 (88.9%)	23 (11.1%)
Family history of breast cancer
Yes	74	51 (68.9%)	23 (31.1%)	2.3	0.126
No	297	230 (77.4%)	67 (22.6%)
Painful breast ulcer or wound
Yes	161	104 (64.6%)	57 (35.4%)	19.2	<0.001*
No	210	177 (84.3%)	33 (15.7%)
History of any comorbidities
Yes	142	76 (53.5%)	66 (46.5%)	61.8	<0.001*
No	229	205 (89.5%)	24 (10.5%)
History of any breast problem before
Yes	138	91 (65.9%)	47 (34.1%)	11.5	0.0004*
No	233	190 (81.5%)	43 (18.5%)
Swelling/lump in armpit
Yes	38	17 (44.7%)	21 (55.3%)	22	<0.001*
No	333	264 (79.3%)	69 (20.7%)
Stage at diagnosis
Early stage (I&II)	107	70 (65.4%)	37 (34.6%)	8.7	0.0003*
Late stage (II&IV)	264	211 (79.9%)	53 (20.1%)

Notes: * statistical significant association, χ2 =chi-square test.

Stage at Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Patients

Out of 371 breast cancer patients who participated in this study; the overall magnitude of late stage diagnosis was 71.2% (95% CI=67.5–77.1%). Among these, 211 (56.9%) patients were diagnosed at stage III and the remaining 53 (14.3%) were stage IV at diagnosis. Stage I and II accounts for 37 (9.9%) and 70 (18.9%) of the breast cancer patients.

Predictors of Patient Delay Among Breast Cancer Patients

Patients who were from rural residence were 3.7-times more likely to delay to presentation (patient delay) than urban residence (AOR=3.72; 95% CI=1.82–7.61). Illiterate women were approximately 3.8-times more likely to be delayed at presentation than those who had secondary educational level and above (AOR=3.8; 95% CI=1.71–8.64).

Patients who had presented with a painless wound were approximately 3.3-times more likely to be presented late than patients who had a painful wound at presentation (AOR=3.32; 95% CI=1.93–5.72). A travel distance to the nearby health facility ≥5 km was also associated with late presentation of patients with breast cancer (AOR=1.66; 95% CI=1.09–3.00).

Breast cancer patients who had swelling or a lump in armpit were less likely to delay than their counterparts. Women who did not have any lump/swelling in their armpit were 6-times more likely to present late to medical care for breast cancer symptoms (AOR=6.16; 95% CI=2.80–13.54). In addition, women who had a history of any breast problem before were less likely to present late to the health facility, while women who did not have any breast problem before were more likely to delay for medical care (AOR=2.46; 95% CI=1.43–4.22) (Table 5).

Table 5

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Patient Delay of Breast Cancer at Two Cancer Referral Centers in Northwest Ethiopia, 2020

Characteristics	Patient delay		Crude OR with 95% CI	Adjusted OR with 95% CI	P-value
	≥3 Months	<3 Months
Age group
<40	40 (48.2%)	43 (51.8%)	1	1	0.634
≥40	191 (66.3%)	97 (33.7%)	2.12 (1.29–3.47)	1.16 (0.638–2.09)
Home residence
Rural	217 (87.2%)	32 (12.8%)	6.1(3.67–10.27)	3.72 (1.82–7.61)	<0.001*
Urban	64 (52.5%)	58 (47.5%)	1	1
Marital status
Married	234 (75.5%)	64 (21.5%)	2.02 (1.16–3.52)	1.38 (0.66–2.91)	0.395
Single	47 (64.4%)	26 (35.6%)	1	1
Comorbidities
Yes	76 (53.5%)	66 (46.5%)	1	1	0.734
No	205 (89.5%)	24 (10.5%)	7.4 (4.33–12.68)	1.11 (0.59–2.07)
Educational status
Illiterate	113 (83.1%)	23 (196.9%)	1.69 (1.06–3.30)*	3.8 (1.71–8.64)	0.001*
Primary education	107 (69.9%)	46 (30.1%)	0.80 (0.44–1.47)	0.96 (0.93–4.14)	0.079
Secondary education and above	61 (74.4%)	21 (25.6%)	1	1
Painful breast ulcer or wound
Yes	104 (64.6%)	57 (35.4%)			<0.001*
No	177 (84.3%)	33 (15.7%)	2.94 (1.79–4.81)	3.32 (1.93–5.72)
Distance to the nearby health facility
<5 km	96 (58.9%)	67 (41.1%)	1		0.0093*
≥5 km	185 (88.9%)	23 (11.1%)	5.61 (3.29–9.58)	1.66 (1.09–3.00)
Swelling or lump in armpit
Yes	17 (44.7%)	21 (55.3%)	1		<0.001*
No	264 (79.3%)	69 (20.7%)	4.73 (2.37–9.44)	6.16 (2.80–13.54)
History of any breast problem before
Yes	91 (65.9%)	47 (34.1%)	1		0.001*
No	190 (81.5%)	43 (18.5%)	2.28 (1.41–3.70)	2.46 (1.43–.22)

Notes: *Istatistically significant association.

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

Patient delay’s in presentation and advanced stage at diagnosis has been widely reported and significantly affects breast cancer survival worldwide. Most breast cancer patients in low-income countries mainly in Africa suffer very long delays and are diagnosed at advanced stages and have lower survival rates.24–26 Evidence has shown that delay in presentation is a significant contributor for progression of the disease to advanced stage, consequently increasing mortality from breast cancer.13,15,20,27,28

We tried to assess the patient delay in presentation and the factors contributing to it among breast cancer patients at two oncology referral centers in the Northwest part of Ethiopia. We found long patient delay (delay to presentation of more than 3 month) of 75.7% with a 95% CI of 71.5-80.2%, with the average patient delay time of 8 months. The patient delay time to presentation ranged from 2 weeks to 36 months. This finding is in line with study findings from sub-Saharan Africa,15 Rwanda,20 Senegal (78.4%),27 and a meta-analysis in Africa (54%).17 However it is much higher than a multinational analysis survey finding in which the average patient delay time was 4.7 weeks, and a finding in China in which the range of patient delay was 0.2–900 days.16,29 The difference might be due to socioeconomic and other development differences between the countries since Ethiopia is a low-income country and with poor health infrastructure and low awareness of people about non-communicable disease including cancer.19

Our study revealed that the majority (264, 71.2%) of breast cancer patients were presented at advanced stage of the disease which is higher than late stage breast cancer report in Libya (65.5%),21 Nigeria (67.3%),12 and Egypt (46%),30 however the finding is lower than studies conducted in South Africa (85%),11 Senegal (81.7%),27 Rwanda (76%),20 and in North-western Tanzania (84.4%).31 The observed variation might be due to differences in staging system and some other sociocultural and infrastructure differences. In the study among the patients diagnosed at advanced stage, the majority (211, 79.9%) of patients had a delay of more than 3 months. Long patient delays were significantly associated with an advanced stages of the disease (P=0.0003). This finding is similar to a study conducted in Iran, in which among patients diagnosed at late stage, the majority had more than 3 months delay and a delay of more than 3 month was a significant predictors of late stage diagnosis.32 A similar study in India showed that the odds of late stage disease were almost 3.5-times more with patient delay of more than 3 months.33 This might be because the delay time will give a longer time for progression and growth of the disease to advanced stage.

Our study showed that the most common reasons mentioned for late presentation to a health facility were lack of awareness about early symptoms of breast cancer (345, 92.9%), use of traditional and spiritual treatment options (286, 77.1%), financial problems for medical care and transport costs (217, 58.5%), relating early symptoms with other medical problems (132, 35.6%), belief that breast cancer has not any medical treatments (88, 23.7%), fear of surgery (loss of breast), and lack of trust on HCP (35, 9.4%). These reasons were reported in other similar studies in which low economic status, lack of access to medical care, anxiety, fear of mastectomy, the necessity to prioritize the immediate needs of daily life, non-disclosure of the situation, hoping the wound will would resolve soon, low education, low level of awareness, religious beliefs, preference for alternative care, and social influence were the factors mentioned for delay presentation.15–17

In our study the multivariable analysis showed that a travel distance to the nearby health facility ≥5 km, being from rural residence, having no history of any breast problem before, having no history of any lump or swelling in the armpit, painless lump in the breast, and being illiterate were important significant predictors of long patient delay.

Women who were from rural areas were 4-times more likely to have delay to presentation (patient delay) than women from an urban residence. This finding is also similar to studies in which women from rural area were presented late to medical care compared with women from urban areas.15,17,20,34,35

Women who traveled ≥5 km to get to the nearby health facility were also 1.6-times more likely to have a long delay in presentation than their counterparts. This can be explained as the long distance traveling to get primary healthcare units and cancer diagnostic centers makes the patients delay in seeking early medical care since women who live far from health facilities will face difficulty of getting transportation access.

Breast cancer awareness and knowledge of the importance of early detection and diagnosis are poor in sub-Saharan African countries.13,34 Similarly in our study illiterate women were “2.5-times more likely to be delayed at presentation than had secondary educational level and above. This finding is similar to other studies conducted in different countries.20,21 This could be explained as illiterate women were able to read materials like brochures, leaflets, etc. which would increase their general knowledge on breast cancer risks, early symptoms, and treatment options which in turn makes them have low awareness about the disease; as a result, their medical care-seeking behavior will be low.

The study shows that patients who had presented with painless breast wound were “3.3-times more likely to present late than patients who had a painful wound at presentation. This is due to the way in which individuals interpret and label their symptoms which possibly influence their early medical seeking behavior, unless the symptoms become painful and severe. This finding is also similarly reported in Egypt and in other sub-Saharan African countries in which women without any pain were more likely to present late than those having pain as the first symptom.15,30

Breast cancer patients who had swelling or a lump in the armpit were less likely to be delayed than their counterparts. Women who did not have any lump/swelling in their armpit were 6-times more likely to present late to medical care for breast cancer symptoms. In addition women who had a history of any breast problem before were less likely to present late to the health facility, while women who did not have any breast problem before were more likely to delay in seeking early medical care. This finding is similar to another study finding in which a negative family history of breast cancer was associated with presentation delay.27 Other similar studies also reported that women who had a previous history of benign breast disease, other co-morbidities, personnel and family history of breast cancer are less likely to delay than their counterparts.35,36 The possible explanation might be people may relate their early symptoms to other usual benign health condition, or they may consider it as a self-limited illness unless the symptoms become large and negatively affect their daily lives. On the other hand, individuals who have personal or family history of any of similar comorbidities will have a need to get early medical seeking due to fear of the conditions and are more likely to visit a health facility early for their underlying medical problems.

Studies also showed that knowledge of breast self-examination increased the likelihood of women to present early for breast cancer care and be diagnosed at early stages.16,17,30 Similarly women who were able to perform breast self-exam were diagnosed earlier compared with others.34 However, in our study the majority (87.9%) of the women did not practice breast self-examination, and most (66.8%) of them detected their breast abnormalities accidentally when they were washing their body, during sleeping, or when they took off their clothes, and some others (15.4%) detected it when they were breast feeding and when the disease produced discharge and pain (6.9%). Only 11.6% of women detected the abnormalities on their breast by breast self-examination. Similarly, 68% of breast cancer patients in Libya noted lumps as an accidental finding, while four (2%) patients detected lump(s) during breast self-examination.21

Strength and Limitation of the Study

Our study is the first study conducted in the Northwestern part of Ethiopia at the only two oncology centers to determine the magnitude of patient delay and the predictors among breast cancer patients, and we involve all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients diagnosed in the study period, which will increase its representativeness. In addition, the hospitals are the only referral centers for all cancer patients in the Northern western region of Ethiopia, so the possibility of getting almost all cases in the region is high. However, due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, the study could not show a cause and effect relationship and recall bias is a potential treat for our study, since patients have difficulties to remember the exact date of their early symptom recognition and other important time points in their diagnostic journey.

Conclusion

In conclusion, long patient delay and advanced stage diagnosis are major findings in our study. Travel distance ≥5 km, being from a rural residence, having no history of any breast problem before, having no history of any lump or swelling in the armpit, painless lump in the breast, and being illiterate were important significant predictors of long patient delay for breast cancer patients in Northwestern Ethiopia. Therefore, public awareness programs about breast cancer should be designed to prevent patient delay in presentation and to promote early detection of cases before advancement.