| Literature DB >> 33173055 |
Kevin Huynh1,2, Wei Ling Florence Lim3,4, Corey Giles1, Kaushala S Jayawardana1, Agus Salim1,5,6,7, Natalie A Mellett1, Adam Alexander T Smith1, Gavriel Olshansky1, Brian G Drew1,2, Pratishtha Chatterjee3,8,9, Ian Martins3,4, Simon M Laws3,10,11, Ashley I Bush12, Christopher C Rowe12,13, Victor L Villemagne13,14, David Ames15, Colin L Masters12, Matthias Arnold16,17, Kwangsik Nho18,19,20, Andrew J Saykin18,20,21, Rebecca Baillie22, Xianlin Han23, Rima Kaddurah-Daouk24,25,26, Ralph N Martins27,28,29,30,31,32, Peter J Meikle33,34.
Abstract
Changes to lipid metabolism are tightly associated with the onset and pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Lipids are complex molecules comprising many isomeric and isobaric species, necessitating detailed analysis to enable interpretation of biological significance. Our expanded targeted lipidomics platform (569 species across 32 classes) allows for detailed lipid separation and characterisation. In this study we examined peripheral samples of two cohorts (AIBL, n = 1112 and ADNI, n = 800). We are able to identify concordant peripheral signatures associated with prevalent AD arising from lipid pathways including; ether lipids, sphingolipids (notably GM3 gangliosides) and lipid classes previously associated with cardiometabolic disease (phosphatidylethanolamine and triglycerides). We subsequently identified similar lipid signatures in both cohorts with future disease. Lastly, we developed multivariate lipid models that improved classification and prediction. Our results provide a holistic view between the lipidome and AD using a comprehensive approach, providing targets for further mechanistic investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33173055 PMCID: PMC7655942 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19473-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Study characteristics.
| AIBL | Prevalent analysis (latest time pointsa) | Incident AD analysis (baseline samples) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | AD | Non-converters | Converters | |||
| 696 | 268 | 714 | 68 | |||
| Age (years)b | 75.27 (6.53) | 81.40 (7.91) | 2.96 × 10−32 | 70.30 (6.90) | 77.00 (6.86) | 5.83 × 10−14 |
| Gender (% female)c | 408 (58.6) | 159 (59.3) | 0.899 | 412 (57.7) | 36 (52.9) | 0.529 |
| BMI (kg/m2)b | 26.29 (4.35) | 25.52 (3.71) | 0.01 | 26.46 (4.19) | 24.77 (3.64) | 0.001 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/l)b | 5.26 (1.12) | 5.39 (1.31) | 0.106 | 5.49 (1.06) | 5.50 (1.08) | 0.886 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l)b | 1.58 (0.43) | 1.50 (0.41) | 0.008 | 1.67 (0.45) | 1.68 (0.51) | 0.853 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l)b | 1.26 (0.63) | 1.50 (0.78) | 9.42 × 10−7 | 1.31 (0.61) | 1.34 (0.55) | 0.784 |
| Site (%Melbourne)c | 402 (57.8) | 185 (69.0) | 0.002 | 398 (55.7) | 44 (64.7) | 0.195 |
| ApoE (no. of ε4 alleles)c | 7.31 × 10−33 | 1.02 × 10−10 | ||||
| 0 | 523 (75.1) | 99 (36.9) | 516 (72.3) | 25 (36.8) | ||
| 1 | 163 (23.4) | 131 (48.9) | 177 (24.8) | 33 (48.5) | ||
| 2 | 10 (1.4) | 38 (14.2) | 21 (2.9) | 10 (14.7) | ||
| Time to conversion/last follow-up (years) | 6.15 (2.18) | 3.06 (2.03) | 3.31 × 10−27 | |||
| Number of MCI individuals (%) | 47 (6.5) | 50 (73.5) | 2.63 × 10−56 | |||
aLatest time point utilises the most recent/last available sample for each participant out of all samples acquired for lipidomics.
bTwo-group ANOVA.
bChi-square.
Fig. 1Characterisation of lipid isomeric species and the relationship of lipid classes and subclasses within the AIBL and ADNI cohorts.
a Characterisation of sphingomyelin isomers. Black trace corresponds to the chromatogram seen under normal conditions. Additional experimental results in the green and blue traces used for identification, corresponding to SM(d18:1/24:1) and SM(d18:2/24:0) respectively. b Characterisation of glycerophospholipid isomers. Black trace corresponds to the chromatogram seen under normal conditions. Red trace is the same scan after sample acid hydrolysis. c Spearman correlation of total lipid classes, subclasses and commonly reported clinical measures (bolded) for the AIBL baseline and ADNI studies.
Fig. 2Associations of lipid class totals with prevalent and incident Alzheimer’s disease.
Forest plots of lipid class associations for a prevalent Alzheimer’s disease (logistic regression, AIBL = 268 cases, 696 control, ADNI = 178 cases, 210 controls) and b incident Alzheimer’s disease (Cox regression, AIBL = 68 cases, 714 controls, ADNI = 166 cases, 397 controls). Lipid classes are generated by the sum of each individual species measured in each class. Regressions are adjusted for age, sex, BMI, total cholesterol, HDL-C, triglycerides, number of APOE4 alleles, statin use and omega-3 supplementation. AIBL was further adjusted for time points (only in logistic regression analysis) and site of blood collection. ADNI was further adjusted for fasting status.
Fig. 3Associations of individual lipid species with prevalent Alzheimer’s disease.
Forest plot outlining the logistic regression results of individual species, between controls and prevalent AD in both the AIBL (blue n = 268 cases, 696 controls) and ADNI (red, n = 178 cases, 210 controls) cohorts with the combined meta-analysis in the middle (green). P value was corrected for multiple comparison using approach by Benjamini and Hochberg. Covariates include age, sex, BMI, total cholesterol, HDL-C, triglycerides, number of APOE4 alleles, statin use and omega-3 supplementation. Additional covariates for AIBL include site of blood collection and time point while ADNI includes fasting status. Open circles, not significant; closed dark circles, significant after FDR correction; coloured circles, top 20 associations ranked by p value.
Fig. 4Associations of individual lipid species with future onset Alzheimer’s disease.
Forest plot outlining the Cox regression results of individual species, between non-converters and future converters in both the AIBL (cyan n = 68 cases, 714 controls) and ADNI (orange, n = 166 cases, 397 controls) cohorts with the combined meta-analysis in the middle (purple). P value was corrected for multiple comparison using approach by Benjamini and Hochberg. Covariates include age (set as timescale), sex, BMI, total cholesterol, HDL-C, triglycerides, number of APOE4 alleles, statin use and omega-3 supplementation. Open circles, not significant; closed dark circles, uncorrected p value; coloured squares, top 10/20 associations ranked by p value.
Summary of modelling statistics.
| Model | Net Reclassification Index (total) | Net Reclassification Index (event) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis of AD | Discovery: AIBL Replication: ADNI | Age + Sex + BMI + APOE | 0.731 (0.726–0.736) | – | – |
| Age + Sex + BMI + APOE + 10 lipidsa | 0.752 (0.747–0.757) | 0.40 (0.38 – 0.42) | 0.19 (0.17–0.20) | ||
Discovery: ADNI Replication: AIBL | Age + Sex + BMI + APOE | 0.820 (0.817–0.823) | – | – | |
| Age + Sex + BMI + APOE + 10 lipidsb | 0.869 (0.866–0.871) | 0.84 (0.82–0.85) | 0.44 (0.42–0.45) | ||
| Future onset of AD | Discovery: AIBL Replication: ADNI | Age + Sex + BMI + APOE | 0.644 (0.640–0.648) | – | – |
| Age + Sex + BMI + APOE + 5 lipidsc | 0.675 (0.671–0.680) | 0.25 (0.23–0.27) | 0.05 (0.04–0.07) | ||
Discovery: ADNI Replication: AIBL | Age + Sex + BMI + APOE | 0.716 (0.709–0.723) | – | – | |
| Age + Sex + BMI + APOE + 5 lipidsd | 0.733 (0.727–0.740) | 0.45 (0.41–0.48) | 0.17 (0.14–0.21) |
aLipid model comprises GM3(d18:1/24:1), PC(O-32:2), PC(15-MHDA_18:1), AC(13:0), PC(P-18:0/22:5), CE(17:0), PC(O-38:5), Cer(d18:2/26:0), PC(P-16:0/18:2) and PC(P-16:0/20:4).
bLipid model comprises PE(O-36:5), SM(d18:2/18:1), PC(O-40:7) (b), SM(43:1), PE(16:0_18:3) (b), CE(24:5), LPC(20:2) [sn1], PS(38:4), GM3(d18:1/20:0) and GM3(d18:1/24:0).
cLipid model comprises DE(18:1), Cer(d18:1/24:1), LPE(18:0) [sn1], Cer(d19:1/24:1) and SM(41:0).
dLipid model comprises DE(18:1), TG(O-52:2) [NL-16:0], PE(16:0_20:3), Cer(d19:1/18:0) and Hex3Cer(d18:1/22:0).