Literature DB >> 33172930

Turnover Modulates the Need for a Cost of Resistance in Adaptive Therapy.

Philip K Maini1, Alexander R A Anderson2, Maximilian A R Strobl2,1, Jeffrey West3, Yannick Viossat4, Mehdi Damaghi5, Mark Robertson-Tessi3, Joel S Brown3, Robert A Gatenby3,6.   

Abstract

Adaptive therapy seeks to exploit intratumoral competition to avoid, or at least delay, the emergence of therapy resistance in cancer. Motivated by promising results in prostate cancer, there is growing interest in extending this approach to other neoplasms. As such, it is urgent to understand the characteristics of a cancer that determine whether or not it will respond well to adaptive therapy. A plausible candidate for such a selection criterion is the fitness cost of resistance. In this article, we study a general, but simple, mathematical model to investigate whether the presence of a cost is necessary for adaptive therapy to extend the time to progression beyond that of a standard-of-care continuous therapy. Tumor cells were divided into sensitive and resistant populations and we model their competition using a system of two ordinary differential equations based on the Lotka-Volterra model. For tumors close to their environmental carrying capacity, a cost was not required. However, for tumors growing far from carrying capacity, a cost may be required to see meaningful gains. Notably, it is important to consider cell turnover in the tumor, and we discuss its role in modulating the impact of a resistance cost. To conclude, we present evidence for the predicted cost-turnover interplay in data from 67 patients with prostate cancer undergoing intermittent androgen deprivation therapy. Our work helps to clarify under which circumstances adaptive therapy may be beneficial and suggests that turnover may play an unexpectedly important role in the decision-making process. SIGNIFICANCE: Tumor cell turnover modulates the speed of selection against drug resistance by amplifying the effects of competition and resistance costs; as such, turnover is an important factor in resistance management via adaptive therapy.See related commentary by Strobl et al., p. 811. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33172930      PMCID: PMC8455086          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  37 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse resistance?

Authors:  Dan I Andersson; Diarmaid Hughes
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Establishment and characterization of models of chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer: Towards a predictive signature of chemoresistance.

Authors:  Niels F Jensen; Jan Stenvang; Mette K Beck; Barbora Hanáková; Kirstine C Belling; Khoa N Do; Birgitte Viuff; Sune B Nygård; Ramneek Gupta; Mads H Rasmussen; Line S Tarpgaard; Tine P Hansen; Eva Budinská; Per Pfeiffer; Fred Bosman; Sabine Tejpar; Arnaud Roth; Mauro Delorenzi; Claus L Andersen; Maria U Rømer; Nils Brünner; José M A Moreira
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Final results of the Canadian prospective phase II trial of intermittent androgen suppression for men in biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: clinical parameters.

Authors:  Nicholas Bruchovsky; Laurence Klotz; Juanita Crook; Shawn Malone; Charles Ludgate; W James Morris; Martin E Gleave; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Optimization of an in vitro chemotherapy to avoid resistant tumours.

Authors:  Cécile Carrère
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Adaptive therapy.

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Ariosto S Silva; Robert J Gillies; B Roy Frieden
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Spatial Heterogeneity and Evolutionary Dynamics Modulate Time to Recurrence in Continuous and Adaptive Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Jill A Gallaher; Pedro M Enriquez-Navas; Kimberly A Luddy; Robert A Gatenby; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Capitalizing on competition: An evolutionary model of competitive release in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey West; Yongqian Ma; Paul K Newton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Mathematical Approach to Differentiate Spontaneous and Induced Evolution to Drug Resistance During Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  James M Greene; Jana L Gevertz; Eduardo D Sontag
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-04

9.  Actual growth rate and tumour cell proliferation in human pulmonary neoplasms.

Authors:  K M Kerr; D Lamb
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Cancer evolution: Darwin and beyond.

Authors:  Roberto Vendramin; Kevin Litchfield; Charles Swanton
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 14.012

2.  Spatial structure impacts adaptive therapy by shaping intra-tumoral competition.

Authors:  Maximilian A R Strobl; Jill Gallaher; Jeffrey West; Mark Robertson-Tessi; Philip K Maini; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  In Silico Investigations of Multi-Drug Adaptive Therapy Protocols.

Authors:  Daniel S Thomas; Luis H Cisneros; Alexander R A Anderson; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  A theoretical analysis of tumour containment.

Authors:  Yannick Viossat; Robert Noble
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 5.  A narrative review of tumor heterogeneity and challenges to tumor drug therapy.

Authors:  Liang Zhu; Minlin Jiang; Hao Wang; Hui Sun; Jun Zhu; Wencheng Zhao; Qiyu Fang; Jia Yu; Peixin Chen; Shengyu Wu; Zixuan Zheng; Yayi He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-08

6.  Immunosuppressive niche engineering at the onset of human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chandler D Gatenbee; Ann-Marie Baker; Ryan O Schenck; Maximilian Strobl; Jeffrey West; Margarida P Neves; Sara Yakub Hasan; Eszter Lakatos; Pierre Martinez; William C H Cross; Marnix Jansen; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Christopher J Whelan; Andrea Sottoriva; Simon Leedham; Mark Robertson-Tessi; Trevor A Graham; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  The impact of the spatial heterogeneity of resistant cells and fibroblasts on treatment response.

Authors:  Masud M A; Jae-Young Kim; Cheol-Ho Pan; Eunjung Kim
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  A life history model of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of polyaneuploid cancer cells.

Authors:  Anuraag Bukkuri; Kenneth J Pienta; Robert H Austin; Emma U Hammarlund; Sarah R Amend; Joel S Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 9.  The role of evolutionary game theory in spatial and non-spatial models of the survival of cooperation in cancer: a review.

Authors:  Helena Coggan; Karen M Page
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.293

10.  A model for the intrinsic limit of cancer therapy: Duality of treatment-induced cell death and treatment-induced stemness.

Authors:  Erin Angelini; Yue Wang; Joseph Xu Zhou; Hong Qian; Sui Huang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.