Literature DB >> 33172878

Secondary transfer of emergency stroke patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy by air in rural England: economic evaluation and considerations.

Diarmuid Coughlan1, Peter McMeekin2, Darren Flynn3, Gary A Ford4,5, Hannah Lumley5, David Burgess6, Joyce Balami7, Andrew Mawson8, Dawn Craig1, Stephen Rice1, Phil White9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a time-sensitive emergency procedure for patients who had ischaemic stroke leading to improved health outcomes. Health systems need to ensure that MT is delivered to as many patients as quickly as possible. Using decision modelling, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of secondary transfer by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) compared with ground emergency medical services (GEMS) of rural patients eligible for MT in England.
METHODS: The model consisted of (1) a short-run decision tree with two branches, representing secondary transfer transportation strategies and (2) a long-run Markov model for a theoretical population of rural patients with a confirmed ischaemic stroke. Strategies were compared by lifetime costs: quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost per QALY gained and net monetary benefit. Sensitivity and scenario analyses explored uncertainty around parameter values.
RESULTS: We used the base case of early-presenting (<6 hours to arterial puncture) patient aged 75 years who had stroke to compare HEMS and GEMS. This produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £28 027 when a 60 min reduction in travel time was assumed. Scenario analyses showed the importance of the reduction in travel time and futile transfers in lowering ICERs. For late presenting (>6 hours to arterial puncture), ground transportation is the dominant strategy.
CONCLUSION: Our model indicates that using HEMS to transfer patients who had stroke eligible for MT from remote hospitals in England may be cost-effective when: travel time is reduced by at least 60 min compared with GEMS, and a £30 000/QALY threshold is used for decision-making. However, several other logistic considerations may impact on the use of air transportation. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emergency ambulance systems; emergency care systems; helicopter retrieval; management; remote and rural medicine; stroke; thromboembolic diseasex

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33172878      PMCID: PMC7788185          DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  18 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and barriers to implementation of thrombolytic and neuroprotective therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in the NHS.

Authors:  P Sandercock; E Berge; M Dennis; J Forbes; P Hand; J Kwan; S Lewis; R Lindley; A Neilson; B Thomas; J Wardlaw
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Is air transport of stroke patients faster than ground transport? A prospective controlled observational study.

Authors:  Rasmus Hesselfeldt; Jesper Gyllenborg; Jacob Steinmetz; Hien Quoc Do; Julie Hejselbæk; Lars S Rasmussen
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  Evolution of the Modified Rankin Scale and Its Use in Future Stroke Trials.

Authors:  Joseph P Broderick; Opeolu Adeoye; Jordan Elm
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.

Authors:  Raul G Nogueira; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Diogo C Haussen; Alain Bonafe; Ronald F Budzik; Parita Bhuva; Dileep R Yavagal; Marc Ribo; Christophe Cognard; Ricardo A Hanel; Cathy A Sila; Ameer E Hassan; Monica Millan; Elad I Levy; Peter Mitchell; Michael Chen; Joey D English; Qaisar A Shah; Frank L Silver; Vitor M Pereira; Brijesh P Mehta; Blaise W Baxter; Michael G Abraham; Pedro Cardona; Erol Veznedaroglu; Frank R Hellinger; Lei Feng; Jawad F Kirmani; Demetrius K Lopes; Brian T Jankowitz; Michael R Frankel; Vincent Costalat; Nirav A Vora; Albert J Yoo; Amer M Malik; Anthony J Furlan; Marta Rubiera; Amin Aghaebrahim; Jean-Marc Olivot; Wondwossen G Tekle; Ryan Shields; Todd Graves; Roger J Lewis; Wade S Smith; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of helicopter and ground emergency medical service: a retrospective analysis of a German rescue helicopter base.

Authors:  Philipp Mommsen; Nikolas Bradt; Christian Zeckey; Hagen Andruszkow; Max Petri; Michael Frink; Frank Hildebrand; Christian Krettek; Christian Probst
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.285

6.  Does helicopter emergency medical service transfer offer benefit to patients with stroke?

Authors:  Michael D Olson; Alejandro A Rabinstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Dawn of a New Era for Stroke Treatment: Implications of the DAWN Study for Acute Stroke Care and Stroke Systems of Care.

Authors:  Mark J Alberts; Martin D Ollenschleger; Amre Nouh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retrievers in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Jeban Ganesalingam; Elena Pizzo; Stephen Morris; Tom Sunderland; Diane Ames; Kyriakos Lobotesis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of endovascular thrombectomy compared with best medical treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Joyce S Balami; Brad A Sutherland; Laurel D Edmunds; Iris Q Grunwald; Ain A Neuhaus; Gina Hadley; Hasneen Karbalai; Kneale A Metcalf; Gabriele C DeLuca; Alastair M Buchan
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.266

10.  Estimating the number of UK stroke patients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy.

Authors:  Peter McMeekin; Philip White; Martin A James; Christopher I Price; Darren Flynn; Gary A Ford
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2017-10-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  National implementation of reperfusion for acute ischaemic stroke in England: How should services be configured? A modelling study.

Authors:  Michael Allen; Kerry Pearn; Gary A Ford; Phil White; Anthony G Rudd; Peter McMeekin; Ken Stein; Martin James
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2021-12-23

2.  Health economic evaluation of the 'Flying Intervention Team' as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study.

Authors:  Marie Coors; Ronja Flemming; Wiebke Schüttig; Gordian Jan Hubert; Nikolai Dominik Hubert; Leonie Sundmacher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.006

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.