Literature DB >> 33172773

A Systematic Review of the Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Nikita R Bhatt1, Stefan W Czarniecki2, Hendrick Borgmann3, Inge M van Oort4, Francesco Esperto5, Benjamin Pradere5, Mark van Gurp6, Jarka Bloemberg6, J Darraugh7, Morgan Rouprêt8, Stacy Loeb9, James N'Dow10, Maria J Ribal11, Gianluca Giannarini12.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Clinical practice guideline (CPG) uptake does not occur spontaneously and requires active implementation, especially for long-term implementation. Social media (SoMe) with its power of rapid and global information exchange among physicians, patients, organizations, and stakeholders in the medical field can open up unprecedented opportunities for CPG dissemination.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the current use of SoMe in CPG dissemination across different medical specialties. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review (SR) of the literature was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases and the general platform Google were searched for all relevant publications (no limitation for publication time and no language restrictions). The search revealed 1881 citations; following title and abstract review, 22 studies were identified; and five studies were finally included after full-text review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: All included studies were published in the past 5 yr; there was a significant improvement in knowledge, awareness, compliance, and positive behavior toward CPGs with the use of SoMe dissemination compared with traditional methods. A large audience (healthcare professionals and patients) viewed and engaged with the SoMe process of CPG dissemination, and expressed an intent to engage in this method in the future. The studies included in the SR reported variable methods of SoMe use and similarly variable methods of analyzing the outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the recent application of SoMe in the context of CPG dissemination, there is no standardized format for its use, and the data available are variable and limited. However, encouraging preliminary results have been reported using SoMe for CPG dissemination in multiple fields, and we have provided a pragmatic method of SoMe usage in CPG dissemination based on the review. It is vital to ensure a uniform method of application and assessment of SoMe use in CPG dissemination and implementation going forward. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Social media (SoMe) plays an important role in rapid and global information exchange among physicians, patients, organizations, and stakeholders in the medical field, and its power can be harnessed in the dissemination of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that guide clinicians in practice. Our review reveals that SoMe use for CPG dissemination is a relatively new concept published approximately 5 yr ago, and it has led to significant improvement in knowledge, awareness, compliance, and positive behavior with respect to the CPGs compared with traditional methods. A large audience (healthcare professionals and patients) viewed and engaged with the SoMe process. We have produced a pragmatic method of using SoMe in CPG dissemination. Considering the importance of CPGs in practice and the ever increasing role of SoMe in the medical profession, a new role for SoMe in CPG dissemination could be established.
Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  European Association of Urology guidelines; Guideline uptake; Social media; Twitter; Urology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33172773     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  5 in total

1.  The good in social media.

Authors: 
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2022-10-19

2.  A quality evaluation of the clinical practice guidelines on breast cancer using the RIGHT checklist.

Authors:  Hanqiong Zhou; Haiyang Chen; Cheng Cheng; Xuan Wu; Yanfang Ma; Jing Han; Ding Li; Geok Hoon Lim; Warren M Rozen; Naohiro Ishii; Pankaj G Roy; Qiming Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

3.  Protocol for a Global Burns Research Priority Setting Partnership to agree the most important unanswered questions in international burns care.

Authors:  Hollie Richards; Robert Staruch; Anni King; Catrin Pugh; Suzannah Kinsella; Jelena Savović; Amber Young
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews.

Authors:  Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento; Ana Beatriz Pizarro; Jussara M Almeida; Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat; Marcos André Gonçalves; Maria Björklund; David Novillo-Ortiz
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 13.831

5.  Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Usage during COVID-19: Motivating Factors and Implications.

Authors:  Yi-Ching Lee; Lindsey A Malcein; Sojung Claire Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.