Literature DB >> 33172317

Low revision rate of dual mobility cups after arthroplasty for acute hip fractures: report of 11,857 hip fractures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007-2019).

Esther M Bloemheuvel1, Liza N Van Steenbergen2, Bart A Swierstra2.   

Abstract

Background and purpose - Dislocation is one of the most frequent reasons for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) for an acute fracture. A dual mobility cup (DMC) might reduce this risk. We determined the cup revision rate after THA for an acute fracture according to type of cup. Patients and methods - All THAs for an acute fracture registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) during 2007-2019 were included (n = 11,857). Type of cup was divided into DMC and unipolar cup (UC). Competing risk analyses were performed with cup revision for any reason as endpoint. Multivariable Cox regression analyses with outcome cup revision were performed adjusted for sex, age, ASA class, and surgical approach, stratified for UC THA with femoral head size of 32 mm and 22-28 mm. Results - A DMC was used in 1,122 (9%) hips. The overall 5-year cup revision rate for any reason after THA for acute fracture was 1.9% (95% CI 1.6-2.2). Cup revision for dislocation within 5 years was performed in 1 of 6 DMC THAs versus 108 of 185 (58%) UC THAs. Univariable Cox regression analyses showed no statistically significant difference in cup revision rate between DMC and UC (HR = 0.8; CI 0.4-1.5). Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed lower risk of cup revision in DMC THA (n = 1,122) compared with UC THA with 22-28 mm femoral head size (n = 2,727) (HR = 0.4; CI 0.2-0.8). Interpretation - The 5-year cup cumulative incidence of revision after THA for acute fracture was comparable for DMC and UC THA. However, DMC THA had a lower risk of cup revision than UC THA with 22-28 mm femoral head.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33172317     DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1845031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  5 in total

1.  Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.

Authors:  John E Farey; James Masters; Alana R Cuthbert; Pernille Iversen; Liza N van Steenbergen; Heather A Prentice; Sam Adie; Adrian Sayers; Michael R Whitehouse; Elizabeth W Paxton; Matthew L Costa; Søren Overgaard; Cecilia Rogmark; Ola Rolfson; Ian A Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  CORR Insights®: Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.

Authors:  Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) for Femoral Neck Fractures: Comparison between Standard and Dual Mobility Implants.

Authors:  Riccardo L Alberio; Mattia Rusconi; Loris Martinetti; Diego Monzeglio; Federico A Grassi
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-07

4.  Hip stability parameters with dual mobility, modular dual mobility and fixed bearing in total hip arthroplasty: an analytical evaluation.

Authors:  Domenico Tigani; Lorenzo Banci; Riccardo Valtorta; Luca Amendola
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Dual mobility versus conventional total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures (DISTINCT): protocol for a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  John E Farey; Tamara Hooper; Tania Alland; Justine M Naylor; Thu-Lan Kelly; Michelle Lorimer; Adriane M Lewin; Margaret Rogers; Chi Kin Law; Jacqueline Close; Steven E Graves; Richard S de Steiger; Peter L Lewis; Sam Adie; Ian A Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.006

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.