| Literature DB >> 33172065 |
Dawid Polak1, Marcin Talar1, Cezary Watala1, Tomasz Przygodzki1.
Abstract
Platelet biology owes to intravital studies not only a better understanding of platelets' role in primary hemostasis but also findings that platelets are important factors in inflammation and atherosclerosis. Researchers who enter the field of intravital platelet studies may be confused by the heterogeneity of experimental protocols utilized. On the one hand, there are a variety of stimuli used to activate platelet response, and on the other hand there are several approaches to measure the outcome of the activation. A number of possible combinations of activation factors with measurement approaches result in the aforementioned heterogeneity. The aim of this review is to present the most often used protocols in a systematic way depending on the stimulus used to activate platelets. By providing examples of studies performed with each of the protocols, we attempt to explain why a particular combination of stimuli and measurement method was applied to study a given aspect of platelet biology.Entities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; inflammation; intravital studies; metastasis; platelets; thrombosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33172065 PMCID: PMC7664321 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Schematic representation of the experimental models described in the paper. Induction of experimental thrombosis by topical application of FeCl3 (a) or by laser (b); induction of experimental thromboembolism by systemic application of platelet agonist (c) and interaction of platelets with inflamed endothelial cells (d).