| Literature DB >> 33171902 |
Guo Jiang1,2,3,4, Shuguang Zhou1,2,3,4, Shichao Cui1,2,3,4, Tao Chen5, Jinlin Wang1,2,3,4, Xi Chen1,2,3,4, Shibin Liao1,2,3, Kefa Zhou1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Detritus geochemical information has been proven through research to be an effective prospecting method in mineral exploration. However, the traditional detritus metal content monitoring methods based on field sampling and laboratory chemical analysis are time-consuming and may not meet the requirements of large-scale <span class="Chemical">metal content monitoring. In this study, we obtained 95 detritus samples and seven HySpex hyperspectral imagery scenes with a spatial resolution of 1 m from Karatag Gobi area, Xinjiang, China, and used partial least squares and wavebands selection methods to explore the usefulness of super-low-altitude HySpex hyperspectral images in estimating detritus feasibility and effectiveness of Cu element content. The results show that: (1) among all the inversion models of transformed spectra, power-logarithm transformation spectrum was the optimal prediction model (coefficient of determination(R2) = 0.586, mean absolute error(MAE) = 21.405); (2) compared to the genetic algorithm (GA) and continuous projection algorithm (SPA), the competitive weighted resampling algorithm (CARS) was the optimal feature band-screening method. The R2 of the inversion model was constructed based on the characteristic bands selected by CARS reaching 0.734, which was higher than that of GA (0.519) and SPA (0.691), and the MAE (19.926) was the lowest. Only 20 bands were used in the model construction, which is lower than that of GA (105) and SPA (42); (3) The power-logarithm transforms, and CARS combined with the model of HySpex hyperspectral images and the Cu content distribution in the study area were obtained, consistent with the actual survey results on the ground. Our results prove that the method incorporating the HySpex hyperspectral data to invert copper content in detritus is feasible and effective, and provides data and a reference method for obtaining geochemical element distribution in a large area and for reducing key areas of geological exploration in the future.Entities:
Keywords: HySpex; geochemistry; partial least square (PLS); spectra transform; wavebands selection
Year: 2020 PMID: 33171902 PMCID: PMC7664244 DOI: 10.3390/s20216325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Geological map of the study area (after Mao et al., 2017) [34], 1. Clastic sedimentary rock; 2. biogenic carbonates; 3. volcainc breccia; 4. dacitic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks; 5. basalt; 6. pyrite felsite; 7. mineralized quartz diorite porphyry; 8. diorite porphyry; 9. Gabbro intrusion; 10. siderite ore bodies; 11. faults; 12. potassic + silication zone; 13. silication + sericitization zone; 14. propylitization zone.
Figure 2Local topography of the study area.
Main parameters of HySpex imaging spectrometer.
| Sensor Name | VNIR-1024 | Sensor Image |
|---|---|---|
| Detector | SiCCD 2048 × 2048 |
|
| Spectral range | 400–1000 nm | |
| Spatial pixels | 1024 | |
| Field of view angle | 17° | |
| Extension lens | 34° | |
| Instantaneous field of view | 0.18 mrad/0.36 mrad | |
| Spectral sampling | 2.8 nm | |
| Spectral number | 216 | |
| Camera weight | 4.6 kg | |
| Camera size(cm) | 31.5 × 8.4 × 13.8 | |
| Power consumption | ~6 W |
Figure 3Sampling methods and hyperspectral image acquisition method: (a) schematic diagram of sampling quadrat; (b) aerial detection platform.
Figure 4Map of the study region: Remote sensing image acquired using HySpex VNIR-1024 imaging sensors (Red: 641 nm; Green: 550 nm; Blue: 471 nm; spatial resolution: 1 m).
Spectral transformation formulas.
| Spectral Transformation | Formula |
|---|---|
| Reciprocal |
|
| Logarithmic |
|
| Power |
|
| Envelope removal |
|
| First-order derivatives |
|
| Second-order derivatives |
|
| Power-logarithmic |
|
| Logarithmic-power |
|
Note: is the wavelength of band i; and are the first and second-order derivatives of the wavelength , respectively; and is the interval between two adjacent wavelengths.
Figure 5Flowchart of HySpex hyperspectral imagery inversion of Cu content: (a) data acquisition; (b) data preprocessing; (c) data analysis; (d) modeling and verification; (e) spatial distribution of Cu content.
Figure 6Cu element content statistical description and histograms, (a) all of the samples; (b) training samples; (c) verification samples; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; SD: standard deviation, CV: coefficient of variation.
Figure 7Visible-near-infrared spectral curves, (a) original and (b) envelope removal spectral curves.
Figure 8Correlation between different transform spectra and copper content: (a) five transformed spectra; (b) combined transformed spectra; R: original spectra; (R)’: first-order derivative spectra; (R)’’: second-order derivative spectra. 1/R: reciprocal spectra; CR(R): envelope removal spectra; lg(R): logarithmic spectra; : power spectra; : log-power spectra; lg(): power-log spectra.
Figure 9Model determination coefficient changes with the number of principal components.
Partial least square (PLS) model accuracy of different transform spectra.
| Spectral Transformations | Number of Principal Components |
| Validation Set | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RRMSEP | MAE | |||
| R | 17 | 0.5048 | 0.4860 | 2.133 | 22.774 |
| (R)′ | 11 | 0.3474 | 0.3167 | 1.906 | 25.949 |
| (R)″ | 5 | 0.2695 | 0.2612 | 1.761 | 27.755 |
|
| 15 | 0.5307 | 0.4905 | 2.137 | 22.712 |
| 1/R | 4 | 0.2725 | 0.2714 | 0.804 | 29.705 |
| CR(R) | 13 | 0.3834 | 0.3634 | 1.638 | 22.829 |
|
| 17 | 0.5201 | 0.4901 | 2.127 | 22.690 |
|
| 17 | 0.5913 | 0.5863 | 2.064 | 21.405 |
|
| 17 | 0.5869 | 0.5628 | 2.079 | 23.035 |
RRMSE is Relative Root Mean Squared Error; MAE is Mean Absolute Error.
Figure 10Visible-near-infrared band correlation thermal map: (a) original spectra; (b) power-logarithmic transformation spectra.
PLS model accuracy of different band selection methods.
| Spectral Transformations | Number of Bands | Number of Principal Components | Determination Coefficient of Training Set ( | Validation Set | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RRMSEP | MAE | ||||
| GA | 105 | 18 | 0.536 | 0.519 | 2.102 | 23.171 |
| CARS | 20 | 12 | 0.751 | 0.734 | 2.21 | 19.926 |
| SPA | 42 | 18 | 0.709 | 0.691 | 2.175 | 21.764 |
Figure 11Waveband selection distribution.
Figure 12Scatter plots of observed Cu content and predicted Cu content for different band selection algorithms, (a) genetic algorithm (GA), (b) continuous protection algorithm (SPA), and (c) competitive weighting resampling algorithm (CARS).
Figure 13Cu content distribution map in the study area: (a) kriging interpolation; (b) hyperspectral inversion.
Figure 14Cu content distribution map in local region.
Figure 15The reflectance of different spectral transforms.