| Literature DB >> 33171894 |
Mirelli Bianchin1, Daiane Pereira1, Jacqueline de Florio Almeida1, Cristiane de Moura1, Rafaelly Simionatto Pinheiro1, Leila Fernanda Serafini Heldt1, Charles Windson Isidoro Haminiuk1, Solange Teresinha Carpes1.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the antioxidant activities (AA) of lyophilized rosemary extract and lyophilized sage extract, and their effects on the oxidative stability of poultry pátê. For this purpose, four poultry pátê formulations with rosemary, sage, sodium erythorbate and a control (without antioxidants) were produced. The rosemary and sage were characterized according to total phenolic compounds (TPC) and AA by several methods. The poultry pátês stored at 4 °C were evaluated by the lipid oxidation. High concentrations of TPC were detected in the rosemary extract and sage extract (46.48 and 41.61 mg GAE/g (Gallic acid equivalent), respectively). The AA of the rosemary and sage extracts determined by free radical-scavenging were 4745.72 and 2462.82 µmol TE/g (Trolox equivalents), respectively. The high concentrations of catechin, rutin, myricetin and p-coumaric acids in these extracts may be responsible for the strong inhibitory action against food pathogens. Besides this, these compounds can be responsible for the best performance in inhibiting lipid oxidation in poultry pátês during storage. This study suggests that rosemary and sage extracts may be used as a natural antioxidant in meat products.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC; Rosmarinus officinalis; Salvia officinalis; antibacterial activity; natural antioxidant; thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS); total phenolic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33171894 PMCID: PMC7664241 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25215160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of rosemary and sage extracts.
| Parameters | Rosemary Extract | Sage Extract |
|---|---|---|
| Total Phenolic Compound (mg GAE/g) | 46.48 ± 0.08 | 41.61 ± 0.91 |
| Total Flavonoid Content (mg QE/g) | 11.89 ± 0.58 | 15.03 ± 0.44 |
| EC50 (µg/mL) | 254.72 ± 0.66 | 398.86 ± 0.10 |
| AA % * | 92.25 ± 0.46 | 79.81 ± 0.56 |
| DPPH (µmol TE/g) | 4745.72 ± 0.47 | 2462.82 ± 0.03 |
| ABTS (µmol TE/g) | 301.47 ± 0.76 | 182.89 ± 0.526 |
| FRAP (µmol de Fe2+/g) | 180.09 ± 0.01 | 133.99 ± 0.68 |
| β-carotene/linoleic (%) ** | 85.67 ± 0.66 | 89.29 ± 0.10 |
QE: Quercetin equivalent; EC50: Equivalent concentration required to obtain a 50% antioxidant effect; TE: Trolox equivalent; * lyophilized rosemary and sage extract at 0.33 mg/mL; ** lyophilized rosemary and sage extract at 6.66 mg/mL. Values are presented as mean ± deviation (n = 3).
Content of phenolic compounds by HPLC of rosemary and sage extracts.
| Phenolic Compounds | Rosemary Extract | Sage Extract (mg/100g) | RT (min) | λ (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic acid | 3.45 ± 0.05 d | 0.46 ± 0.01 f | 6.65 | 280 |
| Catechin | 13.21 ± 1.05 b | - | 10.37 | 280 |
| p-Coumaric acid | 1.37 ± 0.02 g | 30.10 ± 0.15 b | 13.94 | 320 |
| Ferulic acid | 3.21 ± 0.01 e | 0.35 ± 0.03 g | 18.57 | 320 |
| Rutin | 34.62 ± 1.15 a | 6.16 ± 0.10 c | 19.88 | 370 |
| Myricetin | - | 166.62 ± 1.21a | 27.38 | 320 |
| Quercetin | 11.56 ± 0.50 c | 0.62 ± 0.02 e | 31.50 | 320 |
| Kaempferol | 2.24 ± 0.01 f | 4.93 ± 0.31 d | 34.32 | 370 |
RT: Retention time; λ: Wave length; Values mean ± standard deviation. Different letters (a–g) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s test.
Antibacterial activity of rosemary and sage extracts.
| Bacterial | Rosemary Extract | Sage Extract | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC (mg/mL) | MBC (mg/mL) | MIC (mg/mL) | MBC (mg/mL) | |
|
| 0.15 | >5 | >5 | >5 |
|
| 1.25 | >5 | 1.25 | >5 |
|
| 0.30 | >5 | 0.63 | >5 |
|
| 0.63 | >5 | 1.25 | >1.25 |
MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC: Minimum bactericidal concentration.
Average values of TBARS in poultry pâté with rosemary and sage extract during storage at 4 °C.
| Treatments | TBARS (mg of MDA/Kg of Chicken Pâté) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storage Times Days | |||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | |
| T1 | 0.98 ± 0.02 Dd | 1.23 ± 0.04 Cc | 1.87 ± 0.01 Bb | 1.88 ± 0.02 Bc | 2.23 ± 0.02 Ac |
| T2 | 1.18 ± 0.10 Ec | 1.71 ± 0.04 Db | 1.86 ± 0.01 Cb | 2.37 ± 0.03 Bb | 2.69 ± 0.02 Ab |
| T3 | 1.58 ± 0.04 Eb | 1.73 ± 0.05 Db | 2.00 ± 0.01 Ca | 2.28 ± 0.03 Bb | 2.60 ± 0.04 Ab |
| T4 | 1.66 ± 0.03 Ea | 1.85 ± 0.02 Da | 1.91 ± 0.03 Ca | 2.87 ± 0.02 Ba | 3.96 ± 0.30 Aa |
| Average | 1.35 ± 0.05 E | 1.63 ± 0.04 D | 1.91 ± 0.02 C | 2.35 ± 0.04 B | 2.87 ± 0.06 A |
Values are presented as mean ± deviation (n = 3). MDA: malondialdehyde. All measurements were carried out in triplicate. T1: Treatment added 0.2 g/Kg of lyophilized rosemary extract; T2: Treatment added 2 g/Kg of lyophilized sage extract; T3: Treatment with sodium erythorbate (0.2 g/Kg); T4: Treatment control (no added antioxidant); Different lower-case letters (a–d) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s test. Different capital letters (A–E) in the same row indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s test.