| Literature DB >> 33171696 |
Hongyan Yang1, Jun Ma1, Hongwei Hu2, Fanjie Li3.
Abstract
This study aimed to analyse the classification, development trends and the influencing factors of the Chinese older adults' mental health state. Based on longitudinal data of Chinese older adults from 2005 to 2014, 2077 older adults aged 64 to 105 were included and the Latent Class Model, Latent Growth Mixture Model and Multinomial Logit models were employed in this study. We find that there are three types of mental health state of the Chinese older adults: negative, positive and contradictory; and the contradictory type could easily turn into negative or positive mental health state. There are four types of dynamic trends of mental health state: persistently negative, persistently positive, pro-negative, and pro-positive. About 40% of the older adults could maintain positive mental health state, and the pro-negative accounts for larger proportion than the pro-positive. Better economic status, good living habits, cohabitation with family members and pension coverage are beneficial for positive mental health state of the Chinese older adults. There is significant heterogeneity in the state as well as development trends of mental health of the older adults. The older adults with contradictory and negative types of mental health state should get timely psychological help to avoid turning into negative state. A series of polices are needed to promote mental health for the older adults in China.Entities:
Keywords: influencing factors; latent categorial analysis; mental health state; trend
Year: 2020 PMID: 33171696 PMCID: PMC7664866 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Descriptive statistics of mental health of the older adults.
| Items | Scale | 2005 (Means) | 2008 (Means) | 2014 (Means) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fearful or anxious | 1 = always/often/sometimes, 0 = rarely/never | 0.238 | 0.251 | 0.222 |
| Lonely and isolated | 1 = always/often/sometimes, 0 = rarely/never | 0.239 | 0.247 | 0.279 |
| Feel useless when getting older | 1 = always/often/sometimes, 0 = rarely/never | 0.535 | 0.533 | 0.597 |
| Feel unhappy compared to younger age | 1 = always/often/sometimes, 0 = rarely/never | 0.536 | 0.747 | 0.483 |
Descriptive statistics of independent variables (2005).
| Variable | Scale and Range | %(n = 2077)/Means(SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual characteristics | ||
| Gender | Male = 1 | 48.92 |
| Female = 0 | 51.08 | |
| Age | 64–105, continuous variables | 73.69(7.27) |
| Years of education | 0–18, continuous variables | 2.97(3.85) |
| Residence | Rural = 1 | 62.69 |
| Urban = 0 | 37.31 | |
| Self-reported health | Good = 1 | 57.15 |
| 31.63 | ||
| 11.22 | ||
| Activity of daily living | Limited = 1 | 2.74 |
| Normal = 0 | 97.26 | |
| Social participation | Yes = 1 | 21.44 |
| No = 0 | 78.56 | |
| Appetite | Good and above = 1 | 74.68 |
| Else = 0 | 25.32 | |
| Sleep quality | Good and above = 1 | 66.54 |
| Else = 0 | 33.46 | |
| Family characteristics | ||
| Economic status | Rich = 1 | 16.59 |
| 69.14 | ||
| 14.27 | ||
| Co-residence | Yes = 1 | 87.67 |
| No = 0 | 12.33 | |
| Marital status | Having spouse = 1 | 61.96 |
| No spouse = 0 | 38.04 | |
| Number of children alive | 0–11, continuous variables | 3.96(1.73) |
| Social support | ||
| Pension | Yes = 1 | 24.81 |
| No = 0 | 75.19 | |
| Medical insurance | Yes = 1 | 28.55 |
| No = 0 | 71.45 | |
| Accessibility to health service | Yes = 1 | 91.38 |
| No = 0 | 8.62 |
The fit index of latent class model (LCM).
| Year | Class | AIC | BIC | aBIC | Entropy | LMR | BLRT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 1 | 10,307.244 | 10,329.798 | 10,317.090 | - | - | - |
| 2 | 9599.070 | 9649.818 | 9621.224 | 0.654 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
| 3 | 9569.261 | 9648.202 | 9603.723 | 0.561 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
| 4 | 9577.905 | 9685.040 | 9624.676 | 0.458 | 0.4950 | 0.5000 | |
| 5 | 9587.905 | 9723.234 | 9646.984 | 0.620 | 0.5634 | 1.0000 | |
| 2008 | 1 | 9890.891 | 9913.446 | 9900.737 | - | - | - |
| 2 | 9228.250 | 9278.998 | 9250.404 | 0.661 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
| 3 | 9228.029 | 9306.971 | 9262.491 | 0.671 | 0.0745 | 0.0789 | |
| 4 | 9237.728 | 9344.863 | 9284.498 | 0.608 | 0.7081 | 1.0000 | |
| 5 | 9247.728 | 9383.056 | 9306.806 | 0.667 | 0.1421 | 1.0000 | |
| 2014 | 1 | 10,345.513 | 10,368.068 | 10,355.360 | - | - | - |
| 2 | 9558.638 | 9609.386 | 9580.792 | 0.643 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
| 3 | 9518.727 | 9597.668 | 9553.189 | 0.567 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
| 4 | 9524.215 | 9631.350 | 9570.985 | 0.475 | 0.1040 | 0.1200 | |
| 5 | 9534.215 | 9669.543 | 9593.293 | 0.512 | 0.9190 | 1.0000 |
Note. AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; aBIC, Adjusted BIC; LMR, Lo-Mendell-Rubin; BLRT, Bootstrap Likelihood Ratio Test.
Probability and proportion of latent class model of mental health.
| Items | 2005 (n = 2077) | 2008 (n = 2077) | 2014 (n = 2077) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Contradictory | Negative | Positive | Contradictory | Negative | Positive | Contradictory | Negative | |
| Fearful/anxious | 0.051 | 0.183 | 0.936 | 0.092 | 0.325 | 0.914 | 0.040 | 0.176 | 0.695 |
| Lonely | 0.008 | 0.233 | 0.876 | 0.063 | 0.342 | 0.999 | 0.056 | 0.183 | 0.957 |
| Valueless | 0.150 | 0.738 | 0.868 | 0.273 | 0.992 | 0.836 | 0.155 | 0.831 | 0.919 |
| Unhappy | 0.314 | 0.629 | 0.814 | 0.670 | 0.854 | 0.907 | 0.235 | 0.556 | 0.806 |
| Proportion (%) | 39.86 | 46.61 | 13.53 | 51.13 | 34.86 | 14.01 | 36.73 | 42.13 | 21.14 |
Figure 1Conditional probability line chart of LCM in 2005, 2008 and 2014.
The fitness indexes of LGMM.
| Model | AIC | BIC | aBIC | Entropy | LMR | BLRT | Class probability (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 13,479.551 | 13,524.661 | 13,499.244 | - | - | - | 100 |
| Model 2 | 13,397.146 | 13,459.171 | 13,424.223 | 0.524 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 | 38.5/61.5 |
| Model 3 | 13,322.520 | 13,401.462 | 13,356.983 | 0.615 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 42.6/6.7/50.7 |
| Model 4 | 13,248.482 | 13,344.339 | 13,290.329 | 0.613 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 25.9/13.5/16.7/43.9 |
| Model 5 | 13,254.482 | 13,367.255 | 13,303.713 | 0.666 | 0.5000 | 1.0000 | 0.0/13.5/25.9/43.9/16.7 |
The results of LGMM.
| Classes | Means | Est. | S.E. | Est./S.E. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-negative (25.9%) | intercept | 1.477 | 0.067 | 22.043 | 0.000 |
| Slope | 0.465 | 0.046 | 10.037 | 0.000 | |
| Pro-positive (13.5%) | intercept | 2.238 | 0.072 | 31.149 | 0.000 |
| Slope | −0.414 | 0.056 | −7.399 | 0.000 | |
| Persistently negative (16.7%) | intercept | 2.361 | 0.080 | 29.353 | 0.000 |
| Slope | 0.065 | 0.056 | 1.161 | 0.246 | |
| Persistently positive (43.9%) | intercept | 1.295 | 0.037 | 34.631 | 0.000 |
| Slope | 0.027 | 0.026 | 1.040 | 0.298 |
Note. Est., Estimate; S.E., Standard Error.
Figure 2Growth trend of LGMM.
Multinomial Logit Regression Analysis.
| Variables | Pro-Negative | Pro-Positive | Persistently Positive | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Exp(B) | B | Exp(B) | B | Exp(B) | |
| Gender | 0.120 | 1.127 | 0.354 * | 1.425 | 0.529 *** | 1.697 |
| Age | −0.002 | 0.998 | 0.023 | 1.023 | 0.008 | 1.008 |
| Years of education | 0.006 | 1.006 | 0.011 | 1.011 | 0.025 | 1.025 |
| Residence | −0.117 | 0.889 | −0.017 | 0.983 | −0.262 | 0.769 |
| Self-reported health | ||||||
| Middle | 0.060 | 1.061 | 0.079 | 1.083 | 0.325 | 1.384 |
| Good | 0.556 ** | 1.744 | 0.241 | 1.273 | 0.947 *** | 2.579 |
| Activity of daily living | −0.352 | 0.704 | −0.359 | 0.699 | −0.633 | 0.531 |
| Social participation | 0.206 | 1.228 | 0.402 * | 1.495 | 0.340 * | 1.405 |
| Appetite | 0.322 ** | 1.380 | 0.530 *** | 1.699 | 0.373 ** | 1.452 |
| Sleep quality | 0.359 ** | 1.432 | 0.166 | 1.181 | 0.658 *** | 1.931 |
| Economic status | ||||||
| 0.163 | 1.177 | 0.148 | 1.159 | 0.550 *** | 1.733 | |
| 0.581 ** | 1.788 | 0.305 | 1.357 | 0.941 *** | 2.564 | |
| Co-residence | 0.359 | 1.432 | 0.399 | 1.491 | 0.429 ** | 1.536 |
| Marital status | 0.390 ** | 1.477 | 0.437 ** | 1.547 | 0.555 *** | 1.743 |
| Number of children alive | 0.016 | 1.016 | −0.028 | 0.972 | −0.029 | 0.971 |
| Pension | 0.746 *** | 2.109 | 0.431 | 1.539 | 0.796 *** | 2.218 |
| Medical insurance | 0.007 | 1.007 | −0.080 | 0.923 | 0.088 | 1.092 |
| Accessibility to health service | 0.207 | 1.230 | 0.053 | 1.055 | 0.334 | 1.396 |
| Constants | −1.185 | 0.306 | −3.398 *** | 0.033 | −2.666 *** | 0.070 |
| Log likelihood | −2460.9418 | |||||
| Chi-square Statistics | 330.78 *** | |||||
| Pseudo R2 | 0.0630 | |||||
Note: * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01.