Literature DB >> 33171634

Introduction of a Comprehensive Diagnostic and Interdisciplinary Management Approach in Haematological Patients with Mucormycosis: A Pre and Post-Intervention Analysis.

Malene Risum1, Jannik Helweg-Larsen2, Søren Lykke Petersen3, Peter Kampmann3, Ulrik Malthe Overgaard3, Daniel El Fassi4,5, Ove Juul Nielsen3, Mette Brabrand6, Niclas Rubek7, Lars Munksgaard8, Marianne Tang Severinsen9,10, Bendt Nielsen11, Jan Berg Gertsen12, Åsa Gylfe13, Ulla Hjort14, Angeliki Vourtsi15, Rasmus Krøger Hare1, Maiken Cavling Arendrup1,5,16.   

Abstract

Mucormycosis is a life threatening infection in patients with haematological disease. We introduced a Mucorales-PCR and an aggressive, multidisciplinary management approach for mucormycosis during 2016-2017 and evaluated patient outcomes in 13 patients diagnosed and treated in 2012-2019. Management principle: repeated surgical debridement until biopsies from the resection margins were clean as defined by negative Blankophor microscopy, Mucorales-PCR (both reported within 24 h), and cultures. Cultured isolates underwent EUCAST E.Def 9.3.1 susceptibility testing. Antifungal therapy (AFT) (mono/combination) combined with topical AFT (when possible) was given according to the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), severity of the infection, and for azoles, specifically, it was guided by therapeutic drug monitoring. The outcome was evaluated by case record review. All patients underwent surgery guided by diagnostic biopsies from tissue and resection margins (195 samples in total). Comparing 2012-2015 and 2016-2019, the median number of patients of surgical debridements was 3 and 2.5 and of diagnostic samples: microscopy/culture/PCR was 3/3/6 and 10.5/10/10.5, respectively. The sensitivity of microscopy (76%) and Mucorales-PCR (70%) were similar and microscopy was superior to that of culture (53%; p = 0.039). Initial systemic AFT was liposomal amphotericin B (n = 12) or posaconazole (n = 1) given as monotherapy (n = 4) or in combination with isavuconazole/posaconazole (n = 3/6) and terbinafine (n = 3). Nine patients received topical amphotericin B. All received isavuconazole or posaconazole consolidation therapy (n = 13). Mucormycosis related six month mortality was 3/5 in 2012-2015 and 0/7 patients in 2016-2019 (one patient was lost for follow-up). Implementation of combination therapy (systemic+topical AFT/combination systemic AFT) and aggressive surgical debridement guided by optimised diagnostic tests may improve the outcome of mucormycosis in haematologic patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mucorales; haematology; mucormycosis; neutropenia and mortality

Year:  2020        PMID: 33171634      PMCID: PMC7712937          DOI: 10.3390/jof6040268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)        ISSN: 2309-608X


1. Introduction

Mucormycosis is a rare, angio-invasive fungal infection [1]. The incidence is difficult to estimate since systematic surveillance is not performed and cases may be classified as an unspecified invasive fungal infection in the absence of definitive microbiological identification. The overall mortality is almost 100% if untreated [2]. The most common genera involved are Rhizopus, Mucor, Rhizomucor, and Lichtheimia [3]. In industrial countries, the major predisposing factor for mucormycosis is haematological malignancy [1,4,5,6]. The most common manifestations are rhino-orbital-cerebral-mucormycosis (ROCM) and pulmonary mucormycosis [1,5,7]. Pulmonary mucormycosis is the most frequent manifestation in haematological patients [7,8,9,10,11]. Predisposing risk factors are prolonged and severe neutropenia, high-dose corticosteroids, and iron overload (IOL) [12]. Factors that impact survival are the underlying condition, surgical and antifungal treatment, and site of infection [1,2,7,10]. Two comprehensive reviews on mucormycosis reported an overall mortality of 54% and 46%, respectively [2,13]. However, only 15.8% and 32% of the included patients had haematological disease [2,13]. Disseminated infection is associated with haematological disease [10,13] and carries the highest mortality (55–80%) [2]. Mortality is particularly high in relation to allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), in which 100 days mortality is 71% [14]. Early surgery and targeted antifungal treatment is crucial. A delay of six days or more to the initiation of therapy has been shown to increase mortality in haematological patients receiving amphotericin B [15]. The recent global guideline recommends CT scanning, microscopy with fluorescent brightener, and culture for the diagnosis. Although typical microscopic findings are irregular broad pauci-septate 90° branching hyphae, artefacts may confuse the interpretations, particularly for technicians without specific mycology expertise. Therefore, confirmation of microscopy is advised through in situ immunohistochemistry or PCR, where these tests are available and with the caveat that no commercial standardised PCR assays are available and the diagnostic performance of in house tests may vary [16]. Of note, no comments are offered regarding the use of these tests for guiding the need for repeated surgery and fluorescent brightener is not universally implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories. There are no validated antifungal breakpoints for Mucorales [3,17]. Amphotericin B is in vitro active against most Mucorales species, but with high MICs against Cunninghamella species [3]. Isavuconazole and posaconazole have also shown in vivo and in vitro activity with MICs similar to those found for Aspergillus, except against Mucor circinelloides [18]. Itraconazole has some activity, but is not considered a first line therapy [19]. In contrast, fluconazole and voriconazole have no clinical activity against Mucorales [3]. Current guidelines from ECIL-6, ESCMID, and ECMM (European Confederation on Infection in Leukaemia, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, and European Confederation of Medical Mycology) recommend surgical debridement and high dose liposomal amphotericin B (5 mg/kg) together with control of the underlying predisposing condition [16,17,20]. If the CNS is involved, a dosage of liposomal amphotericin B of 10 mg/kg initially is recommended [16,20]. First line treatment with high dose liposomal amphotericin B is strongly recommended, while isavuconazole and posaconazole are recommended with moderate strength. Both triazoles are strongly recommended as salvage treatments [16] and isavuconazole has been approved in the USA as an alternative to liposomal amphotericin B as a first line treatment in mucormycosis. Its licence in Europe is reserved for mucormycosis in patients for whom amphotericin B is inappropriate. Hyperbaric oxygen can be considered as a supportive treatment, whereas deferasirox use in combination with amphotericin B has been associated with increased mortality and should be avoided [16,17,20,21]. The outcome of mucormycosis remains poor despite advances in the antifungal armamentarium. We sought to improve the outcome through an intensified multidisciplinary management approach gradually introduced during 2016–2017 and consisting of surgical revision guided by rapid diagnostics and aggressive combination antifungal therapy. We investigated the survival rate before and after the intervention in a series of 13 patients with proven mucormycosis in 2012 to June 2019 and found no mucormycosis related deaths since 2015.

2. Materials and Methods

This is a case-series based review including all patients with proven mucormycoses from January 2012 to June 2019 for whom mycology advice or diagnostic investigations were requested at the national reference centre for mycology at Statens Serum Institut (SSI). The reference laboratory serves the entire country with diagnostic tests and therapeutic advice as well as species identification and reference susceptibility testing of referred isolates. The current study therefore probably includes the vast majority of proven mucormycosis cases during the study period in Denmark, although we cannot exclude that undiagnosed cases or non-proven cases in patients beyond therapeutic reach and for whom diagnostics or consultation were deemed unnecessary were missed in the current period. One case involved a patient from Sweden (#12) for whom the SSI was consulted concerning diagnostics and management. One patient’s case has been published previously [22].

2.1. Laboratory Investigations

Biopsies were examined by Blankophor microscopy (SSI Diagnostica, Hillerød, Denmark), cultured at YGC medium (Oxoid A/S Thermo Scientific, Roskilde, Denmark) and since 2017, investigated by an in-house Mucorales specific PCR (see below). For one laboratory in Sweden, Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (LabM, Lancashire, UK) supplemented with yeast extract 2.5 g/L (Oxoid, Roskilde, Denmark) and chloramphenicol 50 µg/L was used. Species identification of cultured isolates was performed by micro- and macro-morphology, supplemented by carbon assimilation using ATB ID32C (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) [23], sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) [24], and/or 18 S analysis as necessary [25]. The EUCAST E.Def 9.3.1 reference method was used for susceptibility testing [26]. For culture negative samples, the species identification was obtained by direct ITS PCR and sequencing [24], 18 S analysis [25], and/or Mucorales specific PCR (described below). Thus, in all cases, the involved species identification was molecularly confirmed.

2.2. Mucorales Diagnostic PCRs

(TaqMan) were introduced in 2017 and adopted with slight modifications from those described by Salehi et al. [27]. One test detects Rhizopus microsporus, Rhizopus arrhizus, and Mucor spp. A second test detects Lichtheimia spp. and Rhizomucor spp. DNA extraction Qiacube (Qiagen, Copenhagen, Denmark) standard protocol is for blood and tissue samples, with up to 200 μL input volume and elution in 100 μL. Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were processed using Neo-clear (Sigma- Aldrich, Søborg, Denmark) followed by the protocol as described above. BALs were bead beaten and DNA extracted on the NucliSENS easyMAG (Biomérieux, Ballerup, Denmark) platform with up to 1 mL input volume and elution in 60 μL. PCR analyses were performed on the Applied Biosystems 7500 and since mid-2018, the Quantstudio 5 thermocyclers (Roskilde, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Denmark). Positive and negative template controls were applied, but not PCR inhibition or DNA extraction controls. TaqMan Multiplex Master Mix (polymerase, buffer and dNTPs) as well as primers and probes were acquired from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Glasgow, UK) except for a one locked nucleic acid probe (R. microsporus) from IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies, München-Flughafen, Germany).

2.3. Optimised Clinical Management Principles Were As Follows

Aggressive primary surgery with complete resection of tissue and bone necrosis if possible, guided by microscopy. Supporting imaging was performed in relevant cases. Consecutive debridements were repeated often several times a week until the resection margins were clean. This was defined by negative Blankophor microscopy, Mucorales specific PCR, and cultures of biopsies. Early diagnosis was possible by means of same day Blankophor microscopy and same/next day Mucorales-PCR results. Targeted antifungal therapy combined with topical therapy (when possible) was given according to the MIC (mg/L) and severity of the infection. High trough azole levels above MIC were ensured by target drug monitoring (TDM) [28]. Reconstruction with free flaps should be considered early in cases of exposed bone to ensure optimal effect of the systemic antifungal treatment. Fungal free survival and further clinical data were evaluated by case record review and history provided by the treating physicians at the time of the ongoing fungal infection. Permission for data review was given according to Danish quality-based research regulations.

2.4. Data Management

Positive rates for the diagnostic tests performed within the first 7 days were compared pairwise using Fisher’s exact test (two-sided) with p value < 0.05 regarded significant using GraphPad Prism 8.3.0 (Prism – GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Overall, three, six, and 12 month survival rates were determined and three and six month mucormycosis related deaths specifically were determined in the two periods 2012–2015 and 2016–2018.

3. Results

Thirteen cases of proven mucormycosis in patients with haematological disease (January 2012 to June 2019) were identified and reviewed (Table 1). The median age was 36 years (range: 3–70 years). The majority were males (8/13). Underlying diseases were aplastic anaemia (n = 4), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) (n = 3), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) (n = 2), acute lymphoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n = 1), Burkitt lymphoma (n = 1), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 1), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (n = 1). A detailed case review is available in the Supplementary Materials. The involved species were R. microsporus (n = 6), R. arrhizus (n = 2), Rhizomucor pusillus (n = 2), Lichtheimia corymbifera (n = 1), Lichtheimia ramosa (n = 1), and Circinella muscae (n = 1). The localizations of the infection were the sinuses (n = 7), brain (n = 3), lung (n = 3), liver (n = 1), skin (n = 1), vertebrae (n = 1), and a sub-diaphragmatic abscess (n = 1). Three patients had infections involving neighbour or non-contiguous sites of infection, including one patient with infection involving three separate sites. Two patients with sinus involvement had CNS involvement. Three of the patients with sinus involvement reported marijuana smoking. Five patients had received posaconazole as mould prophylaxis for more than one week prior to the infection (excluding one patient with only three days of posaconazole before the symptoms debut).
Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics of the 13 patients at the time of diagnosis of the Mucorales infection.

Case #YearAge (Years)Disease aImmunosuppressive Regimen bPrior Antifungal Prophylaxis (Duration Indicated for Mould Active Agents)Regions InvolvedSpecies
# 1201226 Aplastic anaemiaNot receivedNoneCerebrum Rhizomucor pusillus
# 2*20133 Pre-B-ALLNOPHO ALL-protocolFLCNose, sinus, orbita, and cerebrum Lichtheimia corymbifera
# 3201542 AMLAML-17 protocol, sorafenib followed by allogeneic HSCT. Sorafenib was initiated during fungal infection due to increasing MRD.FLCLung Rhizopus microsporus
# 4201567 Pre-B-ALLMD Anderson regimePSC for three daysSinus and orbita Rhizopus microsporus
# 5201528 Aplastic anaemiaATG, ciclosporine, prednisone, and tacrolimusPSC for approximately four monthsSinus, orbita, and cerebrum Rhizopus microsporus
# 6201636 Aplastic anaemiaATG, cyclosporine, prednisone, and mycophenolate followed by two allogeneic HSCTFLCSinus and near orbita Circinella muscae
# 7201657 AMLFLAG-IdaPSC for three monthsLung Rhizopus microsporus
# 8201626 Burkitt lymphomaR-CODOX-MFLCLiver Lichtheimia ramosa
# 9201748 Aplastic anaemiaATG, ciclosporine, and eltrombopagPSC for one monthSinus and orbital wall Rhizopus microsporus
# 10201819 Acute T-cell lymphoblastic lymphomaNOPHO ALL-protocol and chemotherapy intrathecallyNoneThe hard palate, sinus, and surrounding tissues Rhizopus arrhizus
# 11201860 (Lost to follow-up)AMLFLAG-IdaPSC for approximately 1–2 weeksSinus Rhizopus arrhizus
# 12201870 MDS RAEB-2AzacytidineFLC and then PSC ** for three monthsForehead Rhizopus microsporus
# 13201821 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with CNS involvementCHOP × 3, R-CHOEP × 3, and high-dose MTX and intrathecally chemotherapyNot prescribedVertebrae, lung abscess, and a subdiaphragmatic abscess Rhizomucor pusillus

a ALL: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, AML: Acute myeloid leukemia, MDS: Myelodysplastic syndrome, RAEB-2: Refractory anemia with excessive blasts-2. b NOPHO: Nordic Society for Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, HSCT: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, MRD: Minimal residual disease, R-CODOX-M: rituximab, cycloposphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, vincristine and methotrexate, FLAG-Ida: Fludarabine, cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and idarubicin, R-CHOEP: Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, MTX: Methotrexate, ATG: Antithymocyte globulin FLC: Fluconazole, PSC: Posaconazole * This case has previously been published in J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2017; 39: e211-15, ** The therapeutic drug monitoring levels were within the recommended ranges.

The results of diagnostic tests, species identification, and susceptibility data are summarised in Table 2 and Table 3. Overall, the fungal infections were confirmed by a positive microscopy in 12/13 patients, by culture in 9/13 patients, and by molecular diagnostic tests in 8/10 patients. The median total number of samples per patient sent for culture was 3 (range 1–18) in 2012–2015 and 10.5 (range 1–55) in 2016–2019. Similarly, the figures for microscopy were 3 (range 0–15) and 10.5 (range 2–60) in 2012–2015 and 2016–2019, respectively. Finally, the number of molecular tests performed was 6 (range 0–24) and 10 (range 0–67) per patient in 2012–2015 and 2016–2019, respectively (Table 2). Assuming that samples taken early are more representative for the diagnostic performance than later during antifungal therapy, which included control samples taken from presumed healthy tissue margins, we compared the positive rates including only samples taken within the first 7 days (Table 3). The positive rate was similar for microscopy 76% (29/38 samples) (95% CI: 61–87%), 18 S PCR 77% (10/13 samples) (95% CI: 50–92%), and Mucorales-PCR 70% (14/20) (95% CI: 48–86%) and higher than that for culture 53% (23/43) (95% CI: 39–67%) for culture and ITS PCR 53% (10/19) (95% CI: 32–73%). The difference was statistically significant for microscopy compared to culture (p = 0.039). When comparing samples taken from the same date, which underwent microscopy and culture simultaneously at both the local and reference laboratories, none were positive (0/37) at direct microscopy at the local laboratory (not using Blankophor staining), while 54% (21/39) were positive with pauci-septate hyphae at the reference laboratory using Blankophor staining. The culture positive rate was similar to 10% (5/49) at the local laboratory and 12% (5/42) at the reference laboratory.
Table 2

Overview of microbiological characteristics and diagnostic tests including all samples from each patient received at the SSI.

Case # (Year)SpeciesSpecies Identification (Final Confirmation)Diagnostic TestsMIC (mg/L)
Blankophor Microscopy (No. Total/No. Positives)Molecular Diagnostics (No. Total/No. Positives)Culture No. Total/Isolates (n with MICs *)AMBPSCISATRB
ITS18 SMUC-PCR
# 1 (2012) Rhizomucor pusillus ITS isolate for species ID2/2Not performed3/3 (1)0.750.125Not done0.5
# 2 (2013) ** Lichtheimia corymbifera ITS primary material8/73/3 9/2 (2)0.5–0.750.2520.25
# 3 (2015) Rhizopus microsporus ITS and 18 S primary material3/33/33/3 3/0
# 4 (2015) Rhizopus microsporus ITS isolate for species ID15/212/012/0 18/4 (4)0.125–0.250.125–11–40.125–0.5
# 5 (2015) Rhizopus microsporus ITS isolate for species IDNot performedNot performed1/1 (1)0.50.2520.5
# 6 (2016) Circinella muscae ITS and 18 S isolate for species ID5/25/05/0 5/1 (1)0.06≤0.030.250.125
# 7 (2016)Rhizopus microsporus ***ITS primary material3/34/33/3 4/0
# 8 (2016) Lichtheimia ramosa 18 S primary material2/22/02/2 1/0
# 9 (2017) Rhizopus microsporus Mucorales-PCR, ITS, and 18 S primary material18/912/119/421/219/4 (2)0.5–10.125–0.1250.5–10.25–0.5
# 10 (2018) Rhizopus arrhizus Mucorales-PCR and ITS primary material60/165/44/158/1755/2 (2)0.1250.250.5–1>4
# 11 (2018) Rhizopus arrhizus Mucorales-PCR and ITS primary material10/93/2 10/1010/8 (6)0.250.25–0.51–2>4
# 12 (2018) a Rhizopus microsporus ITS isolate for species ID12/2Not performed50/3 (1)0.250.52Not done
# 13 (2018) Rhizomucor pusillus Mucorales-PCR and 18 S primary material11/512/46/39/511/0
Cases combined for the early and late time period
# 1–5 (2012–2015)Median 3 (range 1–18)Median 6 (range 0–24)Median 3 (range 1–18)
# 6–13 (2016–2019)Median 10.5 (range 2–60)Median 10 (range 0–67)Median 10.5 (range 1–55)

The included samples and isolates are the ones received at SSI for mycologic diagnostics either directly from the clinical department or referred from the clinical microbiological department. The MIC values are shown with ranges if more than one isolate. ITS: Internal transcribed spacer, MUC-PCR: Mucorales-PCR, AMB: Amphotericin B, ISA: Isavuconazole, PSC: Posaconazole, TRB: Terbinafine, * Cases with positive cultures only. ** This case has previously been published in J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2017; 39: e211–15. *** The first diagnostic ITS was performed on pleurafluid at the local clinical microbiological department. a Patient diagnosed and managed in Sweden according to advice from the SSI.

Table 3

Diagnostic tests performed within the first 7 days from proven diagnosis.

Case # (Year)SpeciesDiagnostic Tests
Blankophor Microscopy (No. Total/No. Positives)Molecular Diagnostics (No. Total/No. Positives)Culture * No. Total/Isolates
ITS18 SMUC-PCR
# 1 (2012) Rhizomucor pusillus 2/2Not performed3/3
# 2 (2013) ** Lichtheimia corymbifera Not performed Not performed1/1
# 3 (2015) Rhizopus microsporus 3/33/33/3 3/0
# 4 (2015) Rhizopus microsporus Not performedNot performed1/1
# 5 (2015) Rhizopus microsporus Not performedNot performed1/1
# 6 (2016) Circinella muscae 1/1 Nor performed1/1
# 7 (2016)Rhizopus microsporus ***Not performed 1/1 1/0
# 8 (2016) Lichtheimia ramosa 1/1 1/1 Not performed
# 9 (2017) Rhizopus microsporus 7/65/16/47/17/3
# 10 (2018) Rhizopus arrhizus 4/34/3 1/11/14/2
# 11 (2018) Rhizopus arrhizus 10/93/2 10/1010/8
# 12 (2018) Rhizopus microsporus 8/2Not performed9/3
# 13 (2018) Rhizomucor pusillus 2/23/0 2/12/22/0
In total, positive rates indicated in parenthesis38/29 (76%) a19/10 (53%)13/10 (77%)20/14 (70%)43/23 (53%) a

* Culture includes isolates received from the local department for clinical microbiology. ** This case has previously been published in J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2017; 39: e211-15. *** The first diagnostic ITS was performed directly on pleurafluid at the local clinical microbiological department. The first culture is pleura fluid. a p = 0.0389 comparing microscopy and culture.

All patients except one since 2016 underwent multiple surgical interventions up to 47 interventions (extending from inspection to larger resections in one patient). After the introduction of Mucorales-PCR, four out of five patients had species identification confirmed by Mucorales-PCR and three patients had continuously Mucorales-PCR performed together with microscopy in relation to the surgical resections. Over the years, patients have been diagnosed and treated in an increasingly closer collaboration between treating physicians and the mycology unit, resulting in an increasing number of diagnostic tests and an earlier diagnosis with species identification possible within 24 h due to the Mucorales-PCR (Table 2). Initial systemic targeted treatment was liposomal amphotericin B in 12 out of 13 patients of whom nine received this in combination with either posaconazole or isavuconazole (Table 4). Three patients received dosages of >5 mg/kg liposomal amphotericin B initially due to suspicion of CNS involvement. Three patients also received terbinafine and all received an azole as consolidation therapy. Nine out of 13 patients received topical amphotericin B, of whom two patients received amphotericin B intrathecally. The number of patients receiving topical antifungal treatment was 3/5 in 2012–2015 and 6/8 in 2016–2019. For intrathecal use, one patient was treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate 0.5 mg/dose daily or three times a week intrathecally (#2). A second patient initially received liposomal amphotericin B 10 mg/dose, which was complicated by severe painful arachnoiditis (#13) and thereafter, amphotericin B deoxycholate 0.1–0.2 mg/dose administrated during 20 min every other day and postoperatively, amphotericin B 2.5 mg twice intrathecally [29].
Table 4

Systemic, topical, surgical, and supportive therapy and mucormycosis outcome of 13 haematological patients.

Case #Systemic Antifungal Treatment, Daily DosageAzole Serum Concentration During Therapy *** Median (Range) (n Measurements)Topical Antifungal TreatmentSurgerySupportive TreatmentOutcome of Mucormycosis at the End of Follow Up
# 1 2012Combination L-AMB 300 mg * × 1 and PSC 300 mg × 3 until death for approximately 2–3 weekss-posaconazole 1.05 (1)Not appliedOne drainage and two craniotomias Not receivedDied within one month
# 2 ** 2013Combination L-AMB 5–9 mg/kg, PSC 37.5–75 mg/kg, and TRB 4 mg/kg for 5, 33, and 2 months, rp.s-posaconazole 1.55 (0.42–4.73) (110)AMB deoxycholate in the sinuses and intrathecally through Ommaya reservoir14 resections including sinus surgeries, removal of eye, brain tissue, and hard palateHyperbaric oxygen 33 sessions Cured
# 3 2015Monotherapy L-AMB (3–5 mg/kg) according to kidney function and adjusted to 3 mg/kg until resection for 10 months followed by monotherapy PSC 300 mg × 1 maintenances-posaconazole 0.5 (0.28–1.5) (5)Topical AMB deoxycholate in the lung cavityOne unilateral pleurapneumectomyG-CSF Cured
# 4 2015Combination L-AMB 5 mg/kg and PSC 300 mg until death for 4 months with a few treatment interruptionss-posaconazole1.5 (0.0–4.2) (24)AMB deoxycholate in the sinusesFive resectionsNot receivedDied of fungal infection after four months
# 5 2015Combination L-AMB 3.5 mg/kg for 1 month and PSC 300 mg for 2 weeks until deathNot doneNot appliedOne surgical biopsy/uncinectomy and two follow-up debridementsIron chelation in relation to iron overloadDied of fungal infection after one month
# 6 2016Combination L-AMB 5 mg/kg daily or 10 mg/kg three times a week for 10 months. PSC 300–450 mg until death after 15 monthss-posaconazole 0.75 (0–2.4)(28)AMB deoxycholate in the sinuses as well as inhalationFour excisions/resectionsNot receivedPresumably cured
# 7 2016Monotherapy L-AMB 5 mg/kg for 3 weeks and then combination of ISA 200 mg and TRB 250 mg for 4 monthsNot doneNot appliedOne lobectomyG-CSFPresumably cured
# 8 2016Monotherapy PSC 300 mg for 1 month and hereafter, monotherapy ISA 200–300 mg according to TDM for 8 monthss-posaconazole 1.2 (1.1–1.6)(7)s-isavuconazole 4.8 (2.4–8.4)(22)Not appliedLiver drainage and one resection with no hyphaeG-CSF Cured
# 9 2017L-AMB 2–5 mg/kg for four months and ISA 200 mg for 16 months. Combination was given for 3 monthss-isavuconazole 3.8 (1.4–5.7)(6)L-AMB installations in the sinuses and intraorbitally. AMB deoxycholate inhalation. Switched to amphotericin B deoxycholate intranasally15 resectionsExcluding two biopsies prior to the resections, which were inconclusiveG-CSFGranulocyte transfusions and hyperbaric oxygen approximately 11 sessions Cured
# 10 2018Combination L-AMB and ISA. AMB dosage 5–8 mg/kg initially and then reduced when fungal infection was controlled. ISA 200–600 mg for 10 months adjusted after TDM until death. Combination was given in 5 months.s-isavuconazole 6.2 (1.2–15.4)(66)AMB deoxycholate in the sinuses47 interventions extending from inspection and sampling to approximately 18 surgical revisions including four larger resectionsHyperbaric oxygen 30 sessionsand G-CSF Cured
# 11 2018Monotherapy L-AMB 5 mg/kg for 3 weeks and monotherapy ISA 200 mg. Duration of ISA is unknown.Not doneAMB deoxycholate in the sinusesTwo resectionsG-CSFPresumably Cured(no longterm follow-up)
# 12 2018Combination L-AMB 5 mg/kg for 3 weeks and PSC 300 mg for 3 monthss-posaconazole 1.3 (0.85–2.1)(14)L-AMB in the woundOne resection and one skin graftIron chelation in relation to iron overload Cured
# 13 2018Combination L-AMB and ISA for 7 months. L-AMB dosage initially 7–10 mg/kg and then 3 mg/kg. ISA 300 mg and TRB 1–2 g/day are still ongoing. s-isavuconazole range 3.3 (1.5–7.3) obtained August-2019(26)L-AMB intrathecally initially. Then changed to AMB deoxycholateTwo vertebrae resections and one lobectomyNot receivedCured mucormycosis treatment is still ongoing

s: serum concentration measured in mg/L. L-AMB: Liposomal amphotericin B, AMB: Amphotericin B, TRB: Terbinafine, G-CSF: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. * Information regarding weight was not accessible. ** This case has previously been published in J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2017; 39: e211–15. *** Therapeutic drug monitoring. The reported azole concentrations shown are the ones measured at Statens Serum Institute.

Choice and dose of systemic antifungal treatment was adjusted according to species, susceptibility pattern, anatomic localisation (local disease vs. disseminated and CNS involvement), and the TDM result when measured. TDM was performed in 10 patients of whom seven received posaconazole and four isavuconazole (patient #8 received posaconazole and isavuconazole sequentially). TDM was individualized according to the fungal MICs, keeping a level clearly above the MIC, and according to the severity and clinical course. The overall three, six, and 12 month survival rates were 83% (10/12), 67% (8/12), and 58% (7/12), respectively (Table 5), excluding one patient who was lost for follow-up one week after diagnosis. The three and six months’ mucormycosis related mortality rates were 17% (2/12) and 25% (3/12), respectively. The overall six month survival rates were 1/3 and 7/9 among patients with and without CNS involvement. The six month survival rate was 6/9 for patients receiving combined systemic antifungal treatment and 2/3 for those who received monotherapy. For patients receiving topical antifungal treatment, 7/8 were alive after six months, as opposed to 1/4 for those who did not receive topical antifungal treatment. Finally, six month mucormycosis related deaths occurred in 3/5 and 0/7 patients in 2012–2015 and 2016-June 2019, respectively. In seven out of 13 patients, the haematological treatment was suspended during mucormycosis treatment, which affected the process of treatment of underlying disease in 6 out of 13 patients. This led to haematological relapse in two further patients after three and six months who were cured for mucormycosis (Table 5).
Table 5

Haematological status and survival.

Case #Haematological DiseaseStatus of Haematological Disease at Fungal Infection Diagnosis and TreatmentChemotherapy/Immunosuppression SuspendedConsequences for Haematological CourseSurvival 3 MonthsSurvival 6 MonthsSurvival 12 Months
# 1 2012Aplastic anaemiaNANoYes. Unable to plan allogeneic HSCTNoNoNo
# 2 * 2013ALLRemission after inductionYesNoYesYesYes
# 3 2015AMLIncreasing MRDYesYes. Allogeneic HSCT postponedYesYesYes
# 4 2015ALLRemission after first hyper-CVAD with rituximab and intrathecal MTX and cytarabine YesYes. Unable to proceed with chemotherapyYesNoNo
# 5 2015Aplastic anaemiaFungal infection developed during second try with ATGYesYes. Unable to proceed with immunosuppressive agentsNoNoNo
# 6 2016Aplastic anaemiaFungal infection developed during second try with ATGYesNoYesYesYes
# 7 2016AMLComplete remission after FLAG-idaYesYes. Prohibitive for allogeneic HSCT resulting in relapseYesNoNo
# 8 2016Burkitt lymphomaNeutropenic during the last course of chemotherapy NoNoYesYesYes
# 9 2017Aplastic anaemiaFungal infection developed after initiation of ATGNoNoYesYesYes
# 10 2018Acute T-cell lymphoblastic lymphomaFungal infection developed during induction and intrathecal MTX and cytarabineYesYes. Later on relapse YesYesNo
# 11 2018AMLComplete remission after FLAG-IdaNoNoUnknownUnknownUnknown
# 12 2018MDSMDS RAEB-2on azacythidineNoNoYesYesYes
# 13 2018Diffuse large B-cell lymhomaRemission and finalized R-CHOEPNoNoYesYesYes

* This case has previously been published in J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2017; 39: e211–15. ALL: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, AML: Acute myeloid leukemia, MDS: Myelodysplastic syndrome, NA: Not available, MRD: Minimal residual disease, CVAD: cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicine, dexamethasone, MTX: Methotrexate, ATG: Antithymocyte globulin, FLAG-Ida: Fludarabine, cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and idarubicin, R-CHOEP: Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, vincristine, etoposide and prednisone, RAEB-2: Refractory anemia with excessive blasts-2. HSCT: Haematopoetic stem cell transplantation. NA: Not available.

4. Discussion

We report 13 cases with proven Mucorales infection diagnosed during 2012–18 and with an overall three, six, and 12 month survival rate of 83%, 67%, and 58%, respectively, with no mucormycosis related deaths after 2015. A multidisciplinary aggressive management approach including a new in house Mucorales-PCR test was introduced during 2016 and 2017, leading to a three times doubling of diagnostic tests per patient for diagnosis and guidance of surgery. All patients diagnosed during 2016–2018 survived the infection and none of the patients with sinus mucormycosis progressed to orbital or CNS involvement. All but one of the patients who received topical antifungal treatment survived the infection, which suggests a potential survival benefit. Although numbers are low, we speculate that the apparently improved outcome compared to patients diagnosed earlier may be a result of a closer collaboration between specialties, leading to early diagnosis and diagnostics driven surgical treatment. Microscopy and Mucorales-PCR enable a more precise guidance of surgery, leading to a more favourable mucormycosis outcome in close collaboration between the haematologist, infectious disease physician, and surgeon, with focus on topical treatment in relation to surgery. Combined surgery and antifungal treatment have previously been associated with a better outcome of mucormycosis in several studies [2,19,30]. However, surgical debridement for mucormycosis is often mutilating, especially in haematological patients with profound thrombocytopenia. These factors necessitate a careful risk assessment, balancing the risks and cosmetic consequences associated with the surgery with the certainty of the diagnosis, amount of affected tissue, and likely outcome. Manesh et al. found a higher mortality in haematological patients and ascribed it to lower rates of surgical debridements [31]. Vironneau et al. found that patients with ROCM not eligible for surgery were more likely to die from their mucormycosis and that local control with repeated and wide surgery had an impact on survival [32]. Rapid diagnostics allow early antifungal therapy and surgery and consequently may limit the extent and number of subsequent surgical revisions, caused by the aggressive angio invasive growth of Mucorales. Blankophor microscopy was more sensitive than standard microscopy and culture and allowed a same day detection, but not a species identification. Positive rates were comparable for 18 S, Mucorales-PCRs, and microscopy, but the advantage of the Mucorales-PCR was a rapid detection, including species identification (within 24 h). This is informative regarding optimal antifungal therapy due to the differential intrinsic susceptibility pattern across the Mucorales species [18]. The fact that the treatment for the underlying haematological disease was suspended in around half of the patients underlines the importance of early diagnosis and management of mucormycosis to avoid both fungal infection related mortality and increased mortality due to delayed therapy of the underlying disease. Our study has limitations. A relatively low number of patients were included from an eight year period during which new treatment modalities for the underlying diseases as well as for fungal infections (introduction of isavuconazole) have occurred. Mucormycosis is, however, a rare infection and thus, it is challenging to obtain larger case series with patients with similar underlying conditions and with a uniform approach to diagnosis and management. Other prospective studies, not restricted to haematological patients, have included 18 to 32 proven cases [21,33,34] and retrospective haematological studies of 20 to 74 proven cases during up to 20 year study periods [8,9,35,36]. We only included patients with proven mucormycosis, such as the study by Kara et al. [35]. This is both a strength (certainty of diagnosis) and a limitation. The latter because excluding cases without a proven infection may confer a risk of selection bias towards patients eligible for (invasive) sampling and subsequent therapy and thus, with a better a priori chance for survival. This concern is supported by two observations. First, a low median age among our patients was found compared to several other studies (36 years versus 40–54 years) [2,5,7,11,13,21,33,34,36]. However, patients in the only other study limited to proven cases also had a low median age of 25 years, yet reported a higher one month overall mortality rate of 55% (11/20), of which 20% (4/20) died from mucormycosis [35]. Second, a minority of our patients and those in the prior study limited to proven cases [35] had pulmonary mucormycosis, which has been associated with a higher mortality compared to sinus mucormycosis [5,7,13]. Pulmonary mucormycosis has been reported as the most common Mucorales manifestation in haematological patients [7,8,9,10,11]. However, Mucorales are ubiquitous and may be found in airway samples as contaminants, leading to an overestimation of the number of pulmonary infections when non-proven cases are included. On the other hand, the challenges associated with invasive thoracic procedures in haematological patients may lead to an underestimation of the true number of proven cases. Finally, the reported mortality is affected by the fact that all cases with mucormycosis involving CNS occurred before 2016, which is associated with a poorer outcome. However, the absence of CNS cases may also be a result of better and earlier disease control. In conclusion, our data suggest improved treatment outcomes for mucormycosis using the following approach: An initial management including (1) early combination therapy with systemic liposomal amphotericin B 5 mg/kg and isavuconazole (with or without terbinafine), (2) imaging supported evaluation of extension and early diagnostic biopsies or immediate resection, most favourable from a sterile site with consideration of risk of surgical complications, (3) real time Blankophor microscopy of removed tissue and biopsies from resection margins (guiding subsequent surgical revisions), and (4) topical amphotericin B treatment when possible in connection with diagnostic resection, (5) dose adjustment of the antifungal treatment according to species, susceptibility pattern, and anatomic localisation (local disease vs. disseminated and CNS involvement) and TDM result, and (6) repeated surgical resections performed until radical resection is achieved. This requires a multidisciplinary approach and close collaboration between the treating physician, the surgeon, and the microbiologist providing real-time Blankophor microscopy and Mucorales-PCR guidance (within 24 h). We suggest that the optimised management principle involving early diagnosis with species identification undoubtably had a clinical impact. However, further studies of the management of this devastating infection are warranted.
  36 in total

Review 1.  Developments in identifying and managing mucormycosis in hematologic cancer patients.

Authors:  Livio Pagano; Giulia Dragonetti; Elena De Carolis; Giuseppe Veltri; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Alessandro Busca
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.929

2.  A global analysis of mucormycosis in France: the RetroZygo Study (2005-2007).

Authors:  F Lanternier; E Dannaoui; G Morizot; C Elie; D Garcia-Hermoso; M Huerre; D Bitar; F Dromer; O Lortholary
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Initial use of combination treatment does not impact survival of 106 patients with haematologic malignancies and mucormycosis: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  A Kyvernitakis; H A Torres; Y Jiang; G Chamilos; R E Lewis; D P Kontoyiannis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Contemporary management and clinical outcomes of mucormycosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports.

Authors:  Wirawan Jeong; Caitlin Keighley; Rory Wolfe; Wee Leng Lee; Monica A Slavin; Sharon C-A Chen; David C M Kong
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Zygomycosis in Europe: analysis of 230 cases accrued by the registry of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) Working Group on Zygomycosis between 2005 and 2007.

Authors:  A Skiada; L Pagano; A Groll; S Zimmerli; B Dupont; K Lagrou; C Lass-Florl; E Bouza; N Klimko; P Gaustad; M Richardson; P Hamal; M Akova; J F Meis; J-L Rodriguez-Tudela; E Roilides; A Mitrousia-Ziouva; G Petrikkos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Mucormycosis-A clinicoepidemiological review of cases over 10 years.

Authors:  Abi Manesh; Priscilla Rupali; Maire O Sullivan; Promila Mohanraj; Vedantam Rupa; Biju George; Joy S Michael
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.377

7.  Mucormycosis-associated fungal infections in patients with haematologic malignancies.

Authors:  I O Kara; Y Tasova; A Uguz; B Sahin
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  In Vitro Activity of Isavuconazole and Comparators against Clinical Isolates of the Mucorales Order.

Authors:  Maiken Cavling Arendrup; Rasmus Hare Jensen; Joseph Meletiadis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  ECIL-6 guidelines for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis and mucormycosis in leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

Authors:  Frederic Tissot; Samir Agrawal; Livio Pagano; Georgios Petrikkos; Andreas H Groll; Anna Skiada; Cornelia Lass-Flörl; Thierry Calandra; Claudio Viscoli; Raoul Herbrecht
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 10.  Global Epidemiology of Mucormycosis.

Authors:  Hariprasath Prakash; Arunaloke Chakrabarti
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Isavuconazole: Serum Concentration Variability and Success Rates for Reaching Target in Comparison with Voriconazole.

Authors:  Malene Risum; Mai-Britt Vestergaard; Ulla Møller Weinreich; Marie Helleberg; Nadja Hawwa Vissing; René Jørgensen
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23

2.  In Silico Designing of a Multitope Vaccine against Rhizopus microsporus with Potential Activity against Other Mucormycosis Causing Fungi.

Authors:  Mohamed A Soltan; Muhammad Alaa Eldeen; Nada Elbassiouny; Hasnaa L Kamel; Kareem M Abdelraheem; Hanaa Abd El-Gayyed; Ahmed M Gouda; Mohammed F Sheha; Eman Fayad; Ola A Abu Ali; Khalid Abd El Ghany; Dalia A El-Damasy; Khaled M Darwish; Sameh S Elhady; Ashraf E Sileem
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Pulmonary mucormycosis in the aftermath of critical COVID-19 in an immunocompromised patient: Mind the diagnostic gap.

Authors:  Cornelia Geisler Crone; Jannik Helweg-Larsen; Morten Steensen; Maiken Cavling Arendrup; Marie Helleberg
Journal:  J Mycol Med       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.391

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.