Tehnaz P Boyle1, James Liu2, K Sophia Dyer, Vinay M Nadkarni3, Carlos A Camargo4, James A Feldman2. 1. From the Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine. 2. Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A national survey found prehospital telemedicine had potential clinical applications but lacked provider opinion on its use for pediatric emergency care. We aimed to (1) estimate prehospital telemedicine use, (2) describe perceived benefits and risks of pediatric applications, and (3) identify preferred utilization strategies by paramedics. METHODS: We administered a 14-question survey to a convenience sample of 25 Massachusetts paramedics attending a regional course in 2018. Volunteer participants were offered a gift card. We compared respondents to a state database for sample representativeness. We present descriptive statistics and summarize qualitative responses. RESULTS: Twenty-five paramedics completed the survey (100% response); 23 (96%) were male, 21 (84%) 40 years or older, and 23 (92%) in urban practice. Respondents were older and more experienced than the average Massachusetts paramedic. Few had used prehospital telemedicine for patients younger than 12 years (8%; 95% confidence interval, 10-26%). Potential benefits included paramedic training (80%), real-time critical care support (68%), risk mitigation (68%), patient documentation (72%), decision support for hospital team activation (68%), and scene visualization (76%). Time delays from telemedicine equipment use (76%) and physician consultation (64%), broadband reliability (52%), and cost (56%) were potential risks. Respondents preferred video strategies for scene visualization, physician-assisted assessment and care. More respondents felt pediatric telemedicine applications would benefit rural/suburban settings than urban ones. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics reported prehospital telemedicine is underutilized for children but identified potential benefits including provider telesupport, training, situational awareness, and documentation. Concerns included transportation delays, cost, and broadband availability. Video was preferred for limited pediatric exposure settings. These results inform which telemedicine applications and strategies paramedics favor for children.
OBJECTIVE: A national survey found prehospital telemedicine had potential clinical applications but lacked provider opinion on its use for pediatric emergency care. We aimed to (1) estimate prehospital telemedicine use, (2) describe perceived benefits and risks of pediatric applications, and (3) identify preferred utilization strategies by paramedics. METHODS: We administered a 14-question survey to a convenience sample of 25 Massachusetts paramedics attending a regional course in 2018. Volunteer participants were offered a gift card. We compared respondents to a state database for sample representativeness. We present descriptive statistics and summarize qualitative responses. RESULTS: Twenty-five paramedics completed the survey (100% response); 23 (96%) were male, 21 (84%) 40 years or older, and 23 (92%) in urban practice. Respondents were older and more experienced than the average Massachusetts paramedic. Few had used prehospital telemedicine for patients younger than 12 years (8%; 95% confidence interval, 10-26%). Potential benefits included paramedic training (80%), real-time critical care support (68%), risk mitigation (68%), patient documentation (72%), decision support for hospital team activation (68%), and scene visualization (76%). Time delays from telemedicine equipment use (76%) and physician consultation (64%), broadband reliability (52%), and cost (56%) were potential risks. Respondents preferred video strategies for scene visualization, physician-assisted assessment and care. More respondents felt pediatric telemedicine applications would benefit rural/suburban settings than urban ones. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics reported prehospital telemedicine is underutilized for children but identified potential benefits including provider telesupport, training, situational awareness, and documentation. Concerns included transportation delays, cost, and broadband availability. Video was preferred for limited pediatric exposure settings. These results inform which telemedicine applications and strategies paramedics favor for children.
Authors: Marie Pierre Gagnon; Estibalitz Orruño; José Asua; Anis Ben Abdeljelil; José Emparanza Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Eric M Jackson; Philomena M Costabile; Aylin Tekes; Katherine M Steffen; Edward S Ahn; Susanna Scafidi; Corina Noje Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Lindsey L Wolf; Ritam Chowdhury; Jefferson Tweed; Lori Vinson; Elena Losina; Adil H Haider; Faisal G Qureshi Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Manish N Shah; Jeremy T Cushman; Colleen O Davis; Jeffrey J Bazarian; Peggy Auinger; Bruce Friedman Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2008 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Lucas Van Oeveren; Julie Donner; Andrea Fantegrossi; Nicholas M Mohr; Calvin A Brown Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Kori S Zachrison; Emily M Hayden; Lee H Schwamm; Janice A Espinola; Ashley F Sullivan; Krislyn M Boggs; Ali S Raja; Carlos A Camargo Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-09-11