Literature DB >> 33170447

Metal Risk Assessment Study of Canned Fish Available on the Iranian Market.

Borhan Mansouri1, Nammam Ali Azadi2, Marzena Albrycht3, Lukasz J Binkowski3, Martyna Błaszczyk3, Unes Hamesadeghi4, Raouf Rahmani5, Afshin Maleki5, Farshid Majnoni6.   

Abstract

Iran is the largest fishery producer in the region reaching nearly 1 million tons. Fish provide a good many nutrients that are beneficial for our health. Due to significant deposits of xenobiotics in the water environments, however, fish may also be a source of non-essential metals, causing a variety of disorders. The main challenges to Iranian fisheries are environmental pollution and quality control, so this study aims to estimate the concentration of cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb) in canned tuna fish produced and consumed in Iran. We studied four popular brands (N = 4 × 20) with ICP-MS and then looked at the concentrations and calculated the risk assessment parameters. We found that the lowest concentration was observed for Cd (18 μg/kg) and the highest for Ni (132 μg/kg). Among the brands studied, Pb concentrations differed most (42.0 to 113.3 μg/kg) and Hg levels were more consistent (24.0 and 39.4 μg/kg). The concentrations of Cd, Hg, and Pb in all the brands tested were below EU permissible thresholds. The intake estimation risk assessment parameters (EDI, contribution to PTWI, and CR) and non-cancer risk assessment parameters based on reference doses (THQ and HI) demonstrated the safety of tested products in respect to all metal concentrations studied, while the parameters regarding the toxic effects (MoE, and ILCR) showed that the consumption might cause health risks in terms of Cd (ILCR), Ni (ILCR), and Pb (MoE). The consumption of the canned fish studied should therefore be maintained at a reasonable level (2-5 meals containing fish weekly), so that it may provide necessary nutrients, while avoiding the health risk due to metal content.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer risk; Food safety; MoE; Non-cancer risk; THQ

Year:  2020        PMID: 33170447     DOI: 10.1007/s12011-020-02446-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res        ISSN: 0163-4984            Impact factor:   3.738


  11 in total

1.  Enzymology. Nickel to the fore.

Authors:  R K Thauer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Comparative study of trace elements in certain fish, meat and meat products.

Authors:  Dilek Demirezen; Kadiriye Uruç
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Distribution and source analysis of heavy metal pollutants in sediments of a rapid developing urban river system.

Authors:  Fang Xia; Liyin Qu; Ting Wang; Lili Luo; Han Chen; Randy A Dahlgren; Minghua Zhang; Kun Mei; Hong Huang
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Heavy metals in wild marine fish from South China Sea: levels, tissue- and species-specific accumulation and potential risk to humans.

Authors:  Jin-Ling Liu; Xiang-Rong Xu; Zhen-Hua Ding; Jia-Xi Peng; Ming-Hua Jin; You-Shao Wang; Yi-Guo Hong; Wei-Zhong Yue
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Health risk assessment of heavy metal intake due to fish consumption in the Sistan region, Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Miri; Elham Akbari; Abdeltif Amrane; Seyed Javad Jafari; Hadi Eslami; Edris Hoseinzadeh; Mansur Zarrabi; Javad Salimi; Mohsen Sayyad-Arbabi; Mahmoud Taghavi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Heavy metal content and molecular species identification in canned tuna: Insights into human food safety.

Authors:  Anna Maria Pappalardo; Chiara Copat; Venera Ferrito; Alfina Grasso; Margherita Ferrante
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 7.  Fish and shellfish as dietary sources of methylmercury and the omega-3 fatty acids, eicosahexaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid: risks and benefits.

Authors:  Kathryn R Mahaffey
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  A risk assessment of heavy metal concentrations in fish and an invertebrate from the Gulf of Antalya.

Authors:  Mustafa Yipel; Ender Yarsan
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Separation of risks and benefits of seafood intake.

Authors:  Esben Budtz-Jørgensen; Philippe Grandjean; Pal Weihe
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Accumulation of heavy metals and human health risk assessment via the consumption of freshwater fish Mastacembelus armatus inhabiting, thermal power plant effluent loaded canal.

Authors:  Mehjbeen Javed; Nazura Usmani
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.