Vesile Yildiz Kabak1, Ceren Gursen2, Ayca Aytar3, Turkan Akbayrak2, Tulin Duger2. 1. Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Sıhhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. vesile_yldz@hotmail.com. 2. Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Sıhhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Vocational School of Health Sciences, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify physical activity level, exercise behavior, barriers, and preferences in female patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: Patients with BCRL consulted to physical therapy to receive lymphedema treatment were included. Age, gender, body mass index matched healthy controls (HC) were included to identify differences. The transtheoretical model was used to determine exercise behavior. Physical activity level was assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). The exercise barriers and preferences of patients with BCRL were recorded using a checklist based on the previous studies. RESULTS: A total of 48 female patients with BCRL and 38 female HC participated in the study. Physical activity level was significantly lower in patients with BCRL when compared to HC (p ˂ 0.05). However, the number of participants who engaged in regular exercise was significantly higher in patients with BCRL than HC (33.2% vs 7.9%, p ˂ 0.05). The most common exercise barriers were fatigue (64.5%), having other responsibilities (60.4%), and weather-related factors (56.2%). Majority of the participants preferred to participate in a supervised (79.1%), structured (66.6%), combined-type (77.1%), and moderate intensity (79.1%) exercise program, and they preferred to be informed at the time of the cancer diagnosis (45.8%) by a physiotherapist (66.6%). Moreover, the most preferred exercise type was walking/jogging (66.6%). CONCLUSION: The present study showed inadequate physical activity and exercise behavior in patients with BCRL. Supportive care interventions are needed to overcome barriers for patients with BCRL. Preferences of patients and exercise enjoyment should also be taken into consideration to increase the participation in exercises.
PURPOSE: To identify physical activity level, exercise behavior, barriers, and preferences in female patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: Patients with BCRL consulted to physical therapy to receive lymphedema treatment were included. Age, gender, body mass index matched healthy controls (HC) were included to identify differences. The transtheoretical model was used to determine exercise behavior. Physical activity level was assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). The exercise barriers and preferences of patients with BCRL were recorded using a checklist based on the previous studies. RESULTS: A total of 48 female patients with BCRL and 38 female HC participated in the study. Physical activity level was significantly lower in patients with BCRL when compared to HC (p ˂ 0.05). However, the number of participants who engaged in regular exercise was significantly higher in patients with BCRL than HC (33.2% vs 7.9%, p ˂ 0.05). The most common exercise barriers were fatigue (64.5%), having other responsibilities (60.4%), and weather-related factors (56.2%). Majority of the participants preferred to participate in a supervised (79.1%), structured (66.6%), combined-type (77.1%), and moderate intensity (79.1%) exercise program, and they preferred to be informed at the time of the cancer diagnosis (45.8%) by a physiotherapist (66.6%). Moreover, the most preferred exercise type was walking/jogging (66.6%). CONCLUSION: The present study showed inadequate physical activity and exercise behavior in patients with BCRL. Supportive care interventions are needed to overcome barriers for patients with BCRL. Preferences of patients and exercise enjoyment should also be taken into consideration to increase the participation in exercises.
Entities:
Keywords:
Barriers; Breast neoplasms; Exercise; Lymphedema; The transtheoretical model
Authors: Saskia F A Duijts; Mizja M Faber; Hester S A Oldenburg; Marc van Beurden; Neil K Aaronson Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Hanne Verbelen; Nick Gebruers; Fau-Mei Eeckhout; Kim Verlinden; Wiebren Tjalma Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Janice N Cormier; Robert L Askew; Kristi S Mungovan; Yan Xing; Merrick I Ross; Jane M Armer Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Victor Domingos Lisita Rosa; Angela Adamski da Silva Reis; Rafael Ribeiro Alves; Caroline Souza Dos Anjos; Ruffo Freitas-Junior Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-09-16 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: María Nieves Muñoz-Alcaraz; Antonio José Jiménez-Vílchez; Mirian Santamaría-Peláez; Luis A Pérula-de Torres; María Victoria Olmo-Carmona; María Teresa Muñoz-García; Presentación Jorge-Gutiérrez; Jesús Serrano-Merino; Esperanza Romero-Rodríguez; Lorena Rodríguez-Elena; Raquel Refusta-Ainaga; María Pilar Lahoz-Sánchez; Belén Miró-Palacios; Mayra Medrano-Cid; Rosa Magallón-Botaya; Luis A Mínguez-Mínguez; Josefa González-Santos; Jerónimo J González-Bernal Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-16 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Carolyn Ee; Anna C Singleton; Michael de Manincor; Elisabeth Elder; Nikki Davis; Christine Mitchell; Tinashe Dune; Freya MacMillan; Kate McBride; Suzanne Grant Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2022 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Maria Elena Garcia-Roca; Miguel Rodriguez-Arrastia; Carmen Ropero-Padilla; Carlos Hernando Domingo; Ana Folch-Ayora; Maria Dolores Temprado-Albalat; Ana Boldo-Roda; Eladio Collado-Boira Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-02-26