| Literature DB >> 33170382 |
Chadathorn Inyai1,2, Gorawit Yusakul3, Jukrapun Komaikul4, Tharita Kitisripanya5, Kittisak Likhitwitayawuid6, Boonchoo Sritularak6, Waraporn Putalun7,8.
Abstract
Large amounts of Morus alba L. (MA) roots are needed as the source of active stilbenes in the industrial production of traditional medicines and cosmeceuticals. A recent investigation demonstrated resveratrol and its derivatives to be promising anti-COVID-19 agents. However, conventional cultivation of MA does not meet the demand for its stilbenes, and root quality usually varies between crops. This study established the in vitro non-GMO root culture of MA and optimized the root density, precursor feeding, and elicitors for stilbene productivity. A root culture with optimal inoculum density (3 g/flask of 30 mL medium) accumulated mulberroside A, oxyresveratrol, and resveratrol at 18.7 ± 1.00 mg/g, 136 ± 5.05 µg/g, and 41.6 ± 5.84 µg/g dry weight (DW), respectively. The feeding of L-tyrosine shortened the time required to reach the stilbene productive stage. Root cultures co-treated with 200 µM methyl jasmonate and 2 mg/mL yeast extract accumulated the highest contents of mulberroside A (30.3 ± 2.68 mg/g DW), oxyresveratrol (68.6 ± 3.53 µg/g DW), and resveratrol (10.2 ± 0.53 µg/g DW). In summary, root culture is a promising and sustainable source of stilbenes for the development of health products and agents for further investigation as potential anti-COVID-19 agents.Entities:
Keywords: Elicitation; Morus alba; Resveratrol; Root culture; Stilbene
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33170382 PMCID: PMC7653670 DOI: 10.1007/s00449-020-02474-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioprocess Biosyst Eng ISSN: 1615-7591 Impact factor: 3.210
Time course for MuA content and DW of culture
| Time | Biomass | Stilbene accumulations1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Weeks) | (g DW/flask) | MuA | OXY | RES |
| 1 | 0.11 ± 0.00a | 10.83 ± 2.33a | 45.39 ± 6.42a | 10.67 ± 1.27a,b |
| 2 | 0.14 ± 0.04a,b | 14.38 ± 0.75a,b | 47.97 ± 2.67a | 12.32 ± 0.27a,d |
| 3 | 0.15 ± 0.03a,b | 18.47 ± 2.11b | 43.14 ± 3.60a | 10.12 ± 0.23b |
| 4 | 0.20 ± 0.02b | 18.68 ± 3.89b | 25.22 ± 0.21b | 2.62 ± 0.29c |
| 5 | 0.20 ± 0.04b | 12.79 ± 2.90a,b | 42.83 ± 1.44a | 13.42 ± 0.35d |
| 6 | 0.22 ± 0.03b | 15.02 ± 1.56a,b | 107.30 ± 2.00c | 24.05 ± 1.28e |
1The contents of MuA are expressed in the unit of mg/g DW, whereas OXY and RES are in the unit of µg/g DW. The data were presented with the form of mean ± SD. The same and different characters indicate the non-significant and significant difference, respectively, when data are compared between them in each column. Statistical significance is determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD (p < 0.05)
Effect of cell density on biomass and stilbenes accumulation
| Biomass1 | GI2 | Stilbenes accumulations3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFW | FFW | FDW | MuA | OXY | RES | |
| 0.5 | 0.70 ± 0.10a | 0.04 ± 0.02a | 0.28 ± 0.10a | 11.1 ± 2.30a | 83.8 ± 6.04a | 13.4 ± 3.59a |
| 1 | 2.60 ± 0.28b | 0.2 ± 0.13a | 0.61 ± 0.04b | 10.2 ± 0.48a, c | 98.0 ± 5.16a | 32.5 ± 3.54b |
| 2 | 4.46 ± 0.28c | 0.38 ± 0.02b | 0.55 ± 0.03b | 13.3 ± 1.88a | 133 ± 7.90b | 38.4 ± 1.51b |
| 3 | 4.33 ± 0.23c | 0.41 ± 0.02b | 0.31 ± 0.04a | 18.7 ± 1.00b | 136 ± 5.05b | 41.6 ± 5.84b |
| 6 | 8.66 ± 0.58d | 0.79 ± 0.01c | 0.31 ± 0.05a | 6.65 ± 0.62c | 88.6 ± 10.5a | 14.0 ± 0.63a |
1The biomasses of MA roots were demonstrated with initial fresh weight (IFW), final fresh weight (FFW), and final DW (FDW), which all are in the unit of g/flask
2Growth index (GI) is calculated regarding the initial fresh weight (IFW) and final fresh weight (FFW)
3The contents of MuA are expressed in the unit of mg/g DW, whereas OXY and RES are in the unit of µg/g DW. The data were presented with the form of mean ± SD. The same and different characters indicate the non-significant and significant difference, respectively, when data are compared between them in each column. Statistical significance is determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1Effects of precursor feeding [0.05 mM PHE, 0.03 mM TYR, and their combination (PT)] on the accumulation of (a) MuA and (b) OXY and RES. The dried root for each treatment was subjected to stilbene extraction with methanol, the content of which was then determined using HPLC and icELISA. The experiment was performed in triplicate (n = 3), and the data are presented as the mean and SD indicated with an error bar. The significance of the mean difference between the precursor treatment and control (CON) was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by the least significant difference at p < 0.01, indicated by *
Fig. 2Effects of 200 µM MJ, 2 mg/mL YS, and their combinations [MY1 (50 µM MJ and 0.5 mg/mL YS), MY2 (100 µM MJ and 1.0 mg/mL YS), and MY3 (200 µM MJ and 2 mg/mL YS)] on (a) the accumulation of MuA and (b) OXY and RES. The dry root for each treatment was subjected to stilbene extraction using methanol, the content of which was then determined using HPLC and icELISA. The experiment was performed in triplicate (n = 3), and the data are presented as the mean and SD indicated with an error bar. The significance of the mean difference between the precursor treatment and control (CON) was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by the least significant difference at p < 0.01, indicated by *