| Literature DB >> 33169718 |
Ammar Salehi-Sahlabadi1, Amin Mokari2, Maryam Elhamkia3, Fariba Farahmand3, Masoumeh Jabbari2, Azita Hekmatdost4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary total antioxidant capacity (DTAC) has been proposed as a tool for assessing the intake of antioxidants. This study aimed to assess whether a relationship exists between dietary total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and the odds of NAFLD. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Case-control studies; Diet; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33169718 PMCID: PMC7585767 DOI: 10.34172/jrhs.2020.18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Res Health Sci ISSN: 2228-7795
General characteristics of cases and controls participating in the study
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age (yr) | 37.88 | 8.92 | 38.63 | 8.71 | 0.720 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.99 | 3.09 | 30.56 | 4.02 | 0.000 |
| Waste hip ratio | 0.87 | 0.06 | 0.97 | 0.06 | 0.480 |
| Dietary total antioxidant capacity (mmol TE) | 19491.58 | 9431.84 | 19536.28 | 462.31 | 0.660 |
| Physical activity (MET-min/wk ) | 1590.30 | 949.44 | 1119.03 | 616.35 | 0.010 |
| Energy (kcal) | 2170.57 | 645.32 | 2315.46 | 621.24 | 0.004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Marital status | 0.001 | ||||
| Single | 70 | 15.6 | 18 | 8.0 | |
| Married | 366 | 81.3 | 199 | 88.4 | |
| Divorced/ widowed | 14 | 3.1 | 8 | 3.6 | |
| Education | 0.001 | ||||
| Lower than diploma | 49 | 10.9 | 33 | 14.7 | |
| Diploma | 186 | 41.3 | 91 | 40.4 | |
| BSc | 143 | 31.8 | 94 | 41.8 | |
| Higher than BSc | 72 | 16.0 | 7 | 3.1 | |
| Smoking status | 0.620 | ||||
| Nonsmoker | 438 | 97.3 | 209 | 92.9 | |
| Smoker | 12 | 2.7 | 16 | 7.1 | |
| Sex | 0.970 | ||||
| Male | 233 | 51.8 | 125 | 55.6 | |
| Female | 217 | 48.2 | 100 | 44.4 | |
Daily macro- and micronutrients intakes in case and control group
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Carbohydrate (g) | 311.25 | 99.04 | 331.68 | 99.47 | 0.711 |
| protein(g) | 73.49 | 23.87 | 78.22 | 24.01 | 0.702 |
| Fat (g) | 76.52 | 28.33 | 81.06 | 29.37 | 0.724 |
| Fiber (g) | 35.45 | 18.17 | 39.85 | 23.07 | 0.010 |
| Cholesterol (mg) | 225.48 | 141.62 | 223.41 | 116.78 | 0.662 |
| Saturated fat (mg) | 25.95 | 10.39 | 26.91 | 10.86 | 0.387 |
| Monounsaturated fatty acid (mg) | 26.41 | 10.24 | 28.29 | 10.83 | 0.702 |
| Vitamin A. REA (mg) | 485.18 | 304.32 | 458.65 | 316.40 | 0.950 |
| Vitamin C (g) | 135.68 | 85.60 | 139.12 | 83.91 | 0.001 |
| Vitamin D (µg) | 2.05 | 1.82 | 1.69 | 1.30 | 0.010 |
| Folic acid(µg) | 504.67 | 155.16 | 543.91 | 174.21 | 0.881 |
| Vitamin 12 (mg) | 3.94 | 1.12 | 4.07 | 2.39 | 0.192 |
| Vitamin K (mg) | 183.81 | 139.60 | 181.35 | 123.47 | 0.090 |
| Zinc (mg) | 10.77 | 3.64 | 11.53 | 3.61 | 0.001 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 311.25 | 99.04 | 331.68 | 99.47 | 0.711 |
| Protein(g) | 73.49 | 23.87 | 78.22 | 24.01 | 0.702 |
Characteristics of participants across quartiles of dietary total antioxidant capacity (µmol TE/100 g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age (yr) | 36.16 | 8.41 | 37.76 | 8.31 | 38.51 | 8.70 | 40.07 | 9.61 | 0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 70.08 | 13.17 | 72.11 | 11.46 | 71.87 | 13.56 | 77.96 | 12.28 | 0.411 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.41 | 4.19 | 27.01 | 3.81 | 27.10 | 4.62 | 26.86 | 4.59 | 0.472 |
| Physical activity (MET) | 1474.14 | 905.14 | 1371.69 | 783.86 | 1427.36 | 932.61 | 1451.80 | 899.32 | 0.730 |
| Energy intake (kcal/d) | 1824.73 | 541.23 | 2121.07 | 509.10 | 2377.99 | 609.11 | 2554.24 | 545.42 | 0.001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sex | 0.244 | ||||||||
| Male | 89 | 13.2 | 92 | 13.6 | 79 | 11.7 | 97 | 15.7 | |
| Female | 79 | 11.7 | 76 | 11.3 | 89 | 13.2 | 71 | 14.4 | |
MET, metabolic equivalent task
Correlation between dietary total antioxidant capacity and total antioxidant capacity from food groups
|
|
|
| Fruits | 0.752 |
| Vegetables | 0.601 |
| Nuts | 0.432 |
| Legumes | 0.351 |
| Fruit juice | 0.310 |
| Tea | 0.290 |
| Olive oil | 0.164 |
Contribution of food groups to overall dietary total antioxidant capacity (DTAC) intake (%)
|
|
|
| Fruit | 26.4 |
| Vegetables | 31.8 |
| Legumes | 8.4 |
| Fruit juice | 2.1 |
| Nut and seed | 8.2 |
| Tea | 11.8 |
| Olive oil | 0.1 |
Crude and Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence interval of the associations between Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and dietary total antioxidant capacity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.79 (0.65, 0.98) | 0.68 (0.53, 0.82) | 0.62 (0.51, 0.74) | 0.033 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.89 (0.75, 1.03) | 0.84 (0.75, 0.94) | 0.78 (0.67, 0.91) | 0.041 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.83 (0.73, 0.94) | 0.81 (0.72, 0.92) | 0.75 (0.64, 0.86) | 0.043 |
Model 1: Crude.
Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, education.
Model 3: Adjusted for age, sex, education, weight, waste hip ratio, body mass index, physical activity, marital status, fiber, vitamin C, vitamin D, zinc, energy.