Literature DB >> 33169221

Incidental long bone cartilage lesions: is any further imaging workup needed?

Sagheer Ahmed1, Shams Jubouri1, Michael Mulligan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of chondrosarcoma in incidentally discovered painless long bone cartilage lesions and to determine if any further imaging is needed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cartilage lesion was said to be an enchondroma when it had characteristic matrix mineralization and no aggressive features. Search of all imaging reports and tumor board files for keywords enchondroma, cartilage lesion, chondroid, and chondrosarcoma. Retrospective review of medical records and imaging studies from 4.5-year period. Data points collected included patient age, sex, lesion site, size, symptoms, type of imaging, imaging appearance, and length of follow-up. Only patients with no pain were included as enchondroma. Patients with final diagnosis of chondrosarcoma were included for comparison of all features.
RESULTS: Only 1/73 (1.4%) patients with an initial incidentally discovered painless lesion was later diagnosed, with new symptoms, as atypical cartilage tumor. Average age was 59.4 years. Bones involved were the femur (n = 33), humerus (n = 30), tibia (n = 7), fibula (n = 2), and ulna (n = 1). Average enchondroma size was 3.9 cm (range 1.4-11.5). Average follow-up was 47 months (range 2-196 months). Eleven long bone chondrosarcomas were identified. All chondrosarcoma patients had pain and aggressive imaging findings.
CONCLUSION: Our study reveals that the rate of chondrosarcoma in incidentally found painless chondroid lesions without aggressive features in long bones is low. Imaging follow-up may be needed only in the setting of new symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atypical cartilage tumor; Chondrosarcoma; Enchondroma; Follow-up; Rate

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33169221     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03664-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  1 in total

1.  Radiographic Enchondroma Surveillance: Assessing Clinical Outcomes and Costs Effectiveness.

Authors:  Craig C Akoh; Ethan Craig; Alexander M Troester; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  The influence of site on the incidence and diagnosis of solitary central cartilage tumours of the femur. A 21st century perspective.

Authors:  A M Davies; A Patel; C Azzopardi; S L James; R Botchu; L Jeys
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-07-30

Review 2.  Society of Skeletal Radiology- white paper. Guidelines for the diagnostic management of incidental solitary bone lesions on CT and MRI in adults: bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS).

Authors:  Connie Y Chang; Hillary W Garner; Shivani Ahlawat; Behrang Amini; Matthew D Bucknor; Jonathan A Flug; Iman Khodarahmi; Michael E Mulligan; Jeffrey J Peterson; Geoffrey M Riley; Mohammad Samim; Santiago A Lozano-Calderon; Jim S Wu
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.128

3.  Diagnostic Value of CT- and MRI-Based Texture Analysis and Imaging Findings for Grading Cartilaginous Tumors in Long Bones.

Authors:  Xue-Ying Deng; Hai-Yan Chen; Jie-Ni Yu; Xiu-Liang Zhu; Jie-Yu Chen; Guo-Liang Shao; Ri-Sheng Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.