| Literature DB >> 33168919 |
Sagheer Ahmed1, Nadeem Altaf2, Mahnoor Ejaz3, Aisha Altaf3, Aneela Amin3, Kholood Janjua4, Arif Ullah Khan5, Imran Imran6, Saeed Khan7.
Abstract
Genetic variation in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 is known to cause significant inter-individual differences in drug response and adverse effects. The frequencies of CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3, both of which are responsible for the low activity of the enzyme, are not known in the Pakistani population. Therefore, we screened various ethnic groups residing in Pakistan for these polymorphisms. A total of 467 healthy human volunteers were recruited from six major ethnicities of Pakistan after written informed consent. Our results indicate that about 20% of the Pakistani population has a genotype containing at least one low activity allele. Ethnic Punjabi and Pathan populations had the highest frequencies of wild type genotypes while Urdu, Seraiki, and Sindhi populations showed higher rates of both low activity genotypes. The Baloch population showed the highest rates of low activity genotypes with less than 50% of the samples showing wild type genotypes, suggesting that more than half of the Baloch population possesses low activity genotypes. The frequencies found in various ethnic groups in Pakistan were comparable with ethnicities in the South Asian region except for the Baloch population. These results suggest that pharmacogenetics screening for low activity genotypes may be a helpful tool for clinicians while prescribing medications metabolized by CYP2C9.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33168919 PMCID: PMC7652876 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76366-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Allelic frequencies of various ethnic groups in Pakistan.
| Ethnic group | n | *1 (95% CI) | *2 (95% CI) | *3 (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 467 | 0.876 (84.61–90.59) | 0.059 (3.76–8.04) | 0.064 (4.18–8.62) |
| Punjabi | 169 | 0.951 (91.85–98.35) | 0.034 (0.67–6.13) | 0.015 (− 0.33–3.33) |
| Pathan | 79 | 0.943 (89.19–99.41) | 0.032 (− 0.68–7.08) | 0.025 (− 0.94–5.94) |
| Urdu | 64 | 0.820 (72.59–91.41) | 0.064 (1.14–12.25) | 0.101 (5.67–19.39) |
| Seraiki | 55 | 0.882 (79.69–96.73) | 0.046 (− 0.94–10.14) | 0.073 (0.43–14.17) |
| Balochi | 50 | 0.620 (48.55–75.45) | 0.160 (5.84–26.16) | 0.220 (10.52–33.48) |
| Sindhi | 50 | 0.830 (72.59–93.41) | 0.090 (1.07–16.93) | 0.080 (0.48–15.51) |
Genotype frequencies of various ethnic groups in Pakistan.
| Genotype | n | Observed genotype frequency (CI) | Expected genotype frequency by HW law |
|---|---|---|---|
| *1*1 | 375 | 80.3 (76.7–83.9) | 79.85 |
| *1*2 | 29 | 6.2 (4.02–8.38) | 7.08 |
| *1*3 | 39 | 8.4 (5.89–10.91) | 8.00 |
| *2*2 | 3 | 0.6 (0.1–1.3) | 0.16 |
| *2*3 | 21 | 4.5 (2.62–6.38) | 4.91 |
| *1*1 | 155 | 91.7 (87.54–95.86) | 91.75 |
| *1*2 | 8 | 4.7 (1.51–7.89) | 4.58 |
| *1*3 | 4 | 2.4 (0.09–4.71) | 2.36 |
| *2*2 | 1 | 0.6 (0.0–1.76) | 0.05 |
| *2*3 | 1 | 0.6 (0.0–1.76) | 1.24 |
| *1*1 | 72 | 91.1 (84.48–97.72) | 88.70 |
| *1*2 | 1 | 1.3 (0.0–3.93) | 6.00 |
| *1*3 | 4 | 5.1 (0.0–10.22) | 4.96 |
| *2*2 | 2 | 2.5 (0.0–6.13) | 0.10 |
| *2*3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.24 |
| Urdu | |||
| *1*1 | 46 | 71.9 (60.89–82.91) | 72.0 |
| *1*2 | 5 | 7.8 (1.23–14.37) | 7.41 |
| *1*3 | 8 | 12.5 (4.4–20.6) | 11.57 |
| *2*2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.19 |
| *2*3 | 5 | 7.8 (1.23–14.37) | 6.83 |
| *1*1 | 44 | 80.0 (69.43–90.57) | 80.00 |
| *1*2 | 3 | 5.5 (− 0.53–11.53) | 5.32 |
| *1*3 | 6 | 10.9 (2.66–19.14) | 10.24 |
| *2*2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.08 |
| *2*3 | 2 | 3.6 (− 1.32–8.52) | 4.36 |
| *1*1 | 23 | 46.0 (32.19–59.81) | 46.44 |
| *1*2 | 5 | 10.0 (1.68–18.32) | 9.10 |
| *1*3 | 11 | 22.0 (10.52–33.48) | 18.44 |
| *2*2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.40 |
| *2*3 | 11 | 22.0 (10.52–33.48) | 25.62 |
| *1*1 | 35 | 70.0 (57.3–82.7) | 70.58 |
| *1*2 | 7 | 14.0 (4.38–23.62) | 12.83 |
| *1*3 | 6 | 12.0 (2.99–21.01) | 11.12 |
| *2*2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.58 |
| *2*3 | 2 | 4.0 (− 1.43–9.43) | 4.89 |
Comparison of CYP2C9*2 allelic frequencies observed in Pakistan with other populations.
| Population | Chi-square statistic | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 165 | 23 | 9.30 | 0.002285 |
| MXL | 115 | 13 | 3.20 | 0.073297 |
| PEL | 166 | 4 | 3.71 | 0.053976 |
| PUR | 179 | 29 | 15.59 | 0.000079 |
| CHS | 209 | 1 | 11.03 | 0.000895 |
| CEU | 168 | 30 | 19.50 | 0.000010 |
| FIN | 182 | 16 | 1.19 | 0.274819 |
| GBR | 166 | 16 | 2.71 | 0.099223 |
| IBS | 184 | 30 | 16.17 | 0.000058 |
| TSI | 181 | 33 | 21.62 | 0.000010 |
| BEB | 169 | 3 | 5.19 | 0.022599 |
| GIH | 196 | 10 | 0.40 | 0.525495 |
| ITU | 199 | 5 | 4.14 | 0.041707 |
| PJL | 182 | 10 | 0.17 | 0.72285 |
| STU | 198 | 6 | 3.03 | 0.081610 |
CLM-Colombian in Medellin, Colombia, MXL-Mexican ancestory in Los Angeles, California, PEL-Peruvian in Lima, Peru, PUR-Puerto Rican in Puerto Rico, CHS-Southern Han Chinese, China, CEU-Utah residents with northern and western European ancestory, FIN-Finnish in Finland, GBR-British in England and Scotland, IBS-Iberian population in Spain, TSI-Toscani in Italy, BEB-Bengali in Bangladesh, GIH-Gujrati Indian in Houston, TX, ITU-Indian Telgu in UK, PJL-Punjabi in Lahore, Pakistan, STU-Sri Lankan Tamil in the UK.
Comparison of CYP2C9*3 allelic frequencies observed in Pakistan with other populations.
| Population | Chi-square statistic | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 176 | 12 | 0.00 | 0.983300 |
| MXL | 125 | 3 | 3.35 | 0.066859 |
| PEL | 168 | 2 | 7.47 | 0.006268 |
| PUR | 199 | 9 | 1.31 | 0.250987 |
| CDX | 181 | 5 | 3.95 | 0.046597 |
| CHB | 198 | 8 | 1.94 | 0.163451 |
| CHS | 200 | 10 | 0.82 | 0.363867 |
| JPT | 204 | 4 | 6.51 | 0.10700 |
| KHV | 191 | 7 | 2.44 | 0.117672 |
| CEU | 185 | 13 | 0.00 | 0.941230 |
| FIN | 187 | 11 | 0.20 | 0.647096 |
| GBR | 169 | 13 | 0.12 | 0.719721 |
| IBS | 196 | 18 | 1.08 | 0.297420 |
| TSI | 196 | 18 | 1.08 | 0.297420 |
| BEB | 152 | 20 | 5.86 | 0.015470 |
| GIH | 179 | 27 | 10.69 | 0.001076 |
| ITU | 183 | 21 | 3.79 | 0.051460 |
| PJL | 173 | 19 | 2.94 | 0.086270 |
| STU | 184 | 20 | 2.92 | 0.087132 |
CLM-Colombian in Medellin, Colombia, MXL-Mexican ancestory in Los Angeles, California, PEL-Peruvian in Lima, Peru, PUR-Puerto Rican in Puerto Rico, CDX-Chinese Dai in Xishuangbanna, China CHB-Han Chinese in Beijing, China, CHS-Southern Han Chinese, China, JPT-Japanese in Tokyo, Japan, KHV-Kinh in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, CEU-Utah residents with northern and western European ancestory, FIN-Finnish in Finland, GBR-British in England and Scotland, IBS-Iberian population in Spain, TSI-Toscani in Italy, BEB-Bengali in Bangladesh, GIH-Gujrati Indian in Houston, TX, ITU-Indian Telgu in UK, PJL-Punjabi in Lahore, Pakistan, STU-Sri Lankan Tamil in the UK.
Figure 1Geographical representation of the ethnic groups investigated in the study. The figure was created using CorelDRAW Graphic Suite 2020 (https://www.coreldraw.com/en/).