Literature DB >> 33168599

Metabolomics of Prostate Cancer Gleason Score in Tumor Tissue and Serum.

Kathryn L Penney1,2, Svitlana Tyekucheva3,4, Jacob Rosenthal4,5, Habiba El Fandy6,7, Ryan Carelli8, Stephanie Borgstein6, Giorgia Zadra6, Giuseppe Nicolò Fanelli9, Lavinia Stefanizzi10, Francesca Giunchi11, Mark Pomerantz12, Samuel Peisch2, Hannah Coulson13, Rosina Lis12, Adam S Kibel14, Michelangelo Fiorentino11, Renato Umeton4,5,15, Massimo Loda16,17,18.   

Abstract

Gleason score, a measure of prostate tumor differentiation, is the strongest predictor of lethal prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis. Metabolomic profiling of tumor and of patient serum could identify biomarkers of aggressive disease and lead to the development of a less-invasive assay to perform active surveillance monitoring. Metabolomic profiling of prostate tissue and serum samples was performed. Metabolite levels and metabolite sets were compared across Gleason scores. Machine learning algorithms were trained and tuned to predict transformation or differentiation status from metabolite data. A total of 135 metabolites were significantly different (P adjusted < 0.05) in tumor versus normal tissue, and pathway analysis identified one sugar metabolism pathway (P adjusted = 0.03). Machine learning identified profiles that predicted tumor versus normal tissue (AUC of 0.82 ± 0.08). In tumor tissue, 25 metabolites were associated with Gleason score (unadjusted P < 0.05), 4 increased in high grade while the remainder were enriched in low grade. While pyroglutamine and 1,5-anhydroglucitol were correlated (0.73 and 0.72, respectively) between tissue and serum from the same patient, no metabolites were consistently associated with Gleason score in serum. Previously reported as well as novel metabolites with differing abundance were identified across tumor tissue. However, a "metabolite signature" for Gleason score was not obtained. This may be due to study design and analytic challenges that future studies should consider. IMPLICATIONS: Metabolic profiling can distinguish benign and neoplastic tissues. A novel unsupervised machine learning method can be utilized to achieve this distinction. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33168599      PMCID: PMC8369519          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-0548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  38 in total

1.  The role of glutathione in determining the response of normal and tumor cells to anticancer drugs.

Authors:  C R Wolf; A D Lewis; J Carmichael; D J Adams; S G Allan; D J Ansell
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 2.  Diagnostic associations of gene expression signatures in prostate cancer tissue.

Authors:  Hao G Nguyen; Christopher J Welty; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Development of an integrated prostate cancer research information system.

Authors:  William K Oh; Julia Hayes; Carolyn Evan; Judith Manola; Daniel J George; Helen Waldron; Meaghan Donovan; John Varner; John Orechia; Beth Katcher; Diana Lu; Arthur Nevins; Renée L Wright; Lauren Tormey; James Talcott; Mark A Rubin; Massimo Loda; William R Sellers; Jerome P Richie; Philip W Kantoff; Jane Weeks
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 4.  Glutathione metabolism as a determinant of therapeutic efficacy: a review.

Authors:  B A Arrick; C F Nathan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  A streamlined three-dimensional volume estimation method accurately classifies prostate tumors by volume.

Authors:  Michael E Chen; Dennis Johnston; Adriana O Reyes; Cindy P Soto; R Joseph Babaian; Patricia Troncoso
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 6.  Glutathione in cancer biology and therapy.

Authors:  José M Estrela; Angel Ortega; Elena Obrador
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.250

7.  Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?

Authors:  Jennifer R Stark; Sven Perner; Meir J Stampfer; Jennifer A Sinnott; Stephen Finn; Anna S Eisenstein; Jing Ma; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Tobias Kurth; Massimo Loda; Edward L Giovannucci; Mark A Rubin; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Spermine and citrate as metabolic biomarkers for assessing prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Guro F Giskeødegård; Helena Bertilsson; Kirsten M Selnæs; Alan J Wright; Tone F Bathen; Trond Viset; Jostein Halgunset; Anders Angelsen; Ingrid S Gribbestad; May-Britt Tessem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prostate Cancer Patients-Negative Biopsy Controls Discrimination by Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis of Urine by LC-QTOF: Upstream Information on Other Omics.

Authors:  M A Fernández-Peralbo; E Gómez-Gómez; M Calderón-Santiago; J Carrasco-Valiente; J Ruiz-García; M J Requena-Tapia; M D Luque de Castro; F Priego-Capote
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Induction of tryptophan hydroxylase in the liver of s.c. tumor model of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Asami Hagiwara; Yoshiyasu Nakamura; Rumi Nishimoto; Satoko Ueno; Yohei Miyagi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 6.716

View more
  3 in total

1.  Untargeted Metabolomics Study of Three Matrices: Seminal Fluid, Urine, and Serum to Search the Potential Indicators of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Magdalena Buszewska-Forajta; Joanna Raczak-Gutknecht; Wiktoria Struck-Lewicka; Magdalena Nizioł; Małgorzata Artymowicz; Marcin Markuszewski; Marta Kordalewska; Marcin Matuszewski; Michał J Markuszewski
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-03-04

2.  Prediction of disease progression indicators in prostate cancer patients receiving HDR-brachytherapy using Raman spectroscopy and semi-supervised learning: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kirsty Milligan; Xinchen Deng; Ramie Ali-Adeeb; Phillip Shreeves; Samantha Punch; Nathalie Costie; Juanita M Crook; Alexandre G Brolo; Julian J Lum; Jeffrey L Andrews; Andrew Jirasek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Fatty Acid Synthesis in Prostate Cancer: Vulnerability or Epiphenomenon?

Authors:  Laura A Sena; Samuel R Denmeade
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 12.701

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.