Literature DB >> 33167713

Sensory Filtering and Sensory Memory in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Robert D Melara1, James C Root2, Raquel Bibi1, Tim A Ahles2.   

Abstract

Survivors of breast and other cancers often report protracted difficulty in performing tasks involving concentration and memory, even years after the completion of treatment. The current study investigated whether cancer and treatment history is associated with deficits in sensory filtering (gating out) and sensory memory (gating in), early processes in stimulus processing that may contribute to difficulties in later remembering. A group of breast cancer survivors and age-matched healthy control participants (mean age 54 years) underwent testing with paired-click and oddball tasks while electroencephalographic (EEG) signals were recorded. The survivors showed relatively poor inhibition of redundant sensory stimulation (P50 suppression). Dipole source analysis localized the survivors' impairment to the hippocampus, with preservation of function in gating mechanisms of the frontal lobe and auditory cortex. Survivors also showed disruption to sensory memory processes needed to register novel information in an otherwise uniform auditory environment (mismatch negativity). The findings suggest that survivors experience deficits in early, automatic mechanisms of sensory gating, which may trigger a cascade of later perceived attentional and memory deficits. If our account is accurate, ideal therapies might aim to restore early inhibitory processes, such as those gauged by P50 suppression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P50 suppression; cancer survivors; dipole source analysis; electroencephalography; mismatch negativity; sensory gating; sensory memory

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33167713      PMCID: PMC9152732          DOI: 10.1177/1550059420971120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci        ISSN: 1550-0594            Impact factor:   2.046


  46 in total

1.  Tangential derivative mapping of axial MEG applied to event-related desynchronization research.

Authors:  M C Bastiaansen; T R Knösche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Alterations in brain activation during working memory processing associated with breast cancer and treatment: a prospective functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Brenna C McDonald; Susan K Conroy; Tim A Ahles; John D West; Andrew J Saykin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Short-term habituation of the intracranially recorded auditory evoked potentials P50 and N100.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Peter Trautner; Oleg A Korzyukov; Nashaat N Boutros; Carlo Schaller; Christian Erich Elger; Martin Kurthen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Dipole modeling of scalp electroencephalogram epileptic discharges: correlation with intracerebral fields.

Authors:  I Merlet; J Gotman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Effects of high-dose and conventional-dose adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term cognitive sequelae in patients with breast cancer: an electrophysiologic study.

Authors:  Baudewijntje P C Kreukels; Sanne B Schagen; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Willem Boogerd; Hans L Hamburger; Martin J Muller; Frits S A M van Dam
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Chemotherapy-Induced Cognitive Impairment Is Associated with Increased Inflammation and Oxidative Damage in the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Ciara Bagnall-Moreau; Sovira Chaudhry; Kaliris Salas-Ramirez; Tim Ahles; Karen Hubbard
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  P50 gating deficit in Alzheimer dementia correlates to frontal neuropsychological function.

Authors:  Christine Thomas; Ingo vom Berg; Andre Rupp; Ulrich Seidl; Johannes Schröder; Daniela Roesch-Ely; Stefan H Kreisel; Christoph Mundt; Matthias Weisbrod
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Long-lasting suppression of hippocampal cell proliferation and impaired cognitive performance by methotrexate in the rat.

Authors:  Riejanne Seigers; Sanne B Schagen; Wieteke Beerling; Willem Boogerd; Olaf van Tellingen; Frits S A M van Dam; Jaap M Koolhaas; Bauke Buwalda
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Schizophrenia, sensory gating, and nicotinic receptors.

Authors:  L E Adler; A Olincy; M Waldo; J G Harris; J Griffith; K Stevens; K Flach; H Nagamoto; P Bickford; S Leonard; R Freedman
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.