Literature DB >> 33167671

Herbal Medicine Treatment for Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Minhyung Choi1, Sun Haeng Lee1,2, Gyu Tae Chang1.   

Abstract

The aim of this research is to evaluate the clinical evidence of an herbal medicine (HM) treatment on influenza and describe the potential benefits and adverse events by reviewing all relevant randomized controlled trials. All papers published from 2010 to 2019 in all languages in six databases were searched, including all randomized controlled trials on adults and children, testing herbal medicine for treatment of influenza, alone or in combination with conventional antiviral therapy. The main outcome parameters of interest were total effective rate, time to resolution of fever, adverse events, complications, and duration of viral shedding. 25 trials of 3044 patients were included. Herbal medicine compared to placebo significantly reduced time to fever resolution by 4.96[Formula: see text]h (mean difference, [Formula: see text]4.96; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]7.11 to [Formula: see text]2.80; [Formula: see text]), herbal medicine compared to oseltamivir showed no significant difference (mean difference, [Formula: see text]1.82; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]6.08 to 2.44; [Formula: see text]), and herbal medicine plus oseltamivir combined treatment significantly reduced duration of fever by 7.84[Formula: see text]h compared to a single treatment with oseltamivir (mean difference, [Formula: see text]7.84; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]12.51 to [Formula: see text]3.17; [Formula: see text]). Herbal medicine compared to placebo showed a significantly better total effective rate (risk ratio, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.18 to 3.07; [Formula: see text]), herbal medicine compared to oseltamivir indicated significantly better effective rate (risk ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.29; [Formula: see text]), and combined treatment showed a significantly better total effective rate compared to a single treatment with oseltamivir (risk ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.36; [Formula: see text]). Regarding safety, no serious adverse events were reported in HM treatment. HM presented fewer adverse events compared to oseltamivir, but the difference was not significant (risk difference, [Formula: see text]0.04; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]0.09 to 0.00; [Formula: see text]), and the combined treatment did not increase adverse events compared to oseltamivir (risk difference, [Formula: see text]0.02; 95% CI, [Formula: see text]0.06 to 0.02; [Formula: see text]). Research findings show that herbal medicine treatments have beneficial therapeutic effects on influenza and could decrease duration of fever and improve total effective rate. In addition, herbal medicine plus oseltamivir combined therapy could increase the therapeutic effect compared to a single treatment with oseltamivir.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Herbal Medicine; Influenza; Meta-Analysis; Review; Systematic Review

Year:  2020        PMID: 33167671     DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X20500779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Chin Med        ISSN: 0192-415X            Impact factor:   4.667


  2 in total

1.  Effects of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait and Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Randomized Controlled Studies.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jin-Lin Peng; Jian-Bin Ou-Yang; Li Gan; Shuai Zeng; Hong-Yan Wang; Guan-Chao Zuo; Ling Qiu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 2.  Clinical Randomized Controlled Study of Acupuncture Treatment on Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jin-Lin Peng; Fu-Qiang Qiao; Wen-Ming Cheng; Guang-Wen Lin; Yao Zhang; Tian-Ge Gao; Ying-Ying Sun; Wei-Zhong Tang; Pu Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.629

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.