| Literature DB >> 33167556 |
Prasara Jakkaew1,2, Takao Onoye1.
Abstract
Monitoring of respiration and body movements during sleep is a part of screening sleep disorders related to health status. Nowadays, thermal-based methods are presented to monitor the sleeping person without any sensors attached to the body to protect privacy. A non-contact respiration monitoring based on thermal videos requires visible facial landmarks like nostril and mouth. The limitation of these techniques is the failure of face detection while sleeping with a fixed camera position. This study presents the non-contact respiration monitoring approach that does not require facial landmark visibility under the natural sleep environment, which implies an uncontrolled sleep posture, darkness, and subjects covered with a blanket. The automatic region of interest (ROI) extraction by temperature detection and breathing motion detection is based on image processing integrated to obtain the respiration signals. A signal processing technique was used to estimate respiration and body movements information from a sequence of thermal video. The proposed approach has been tested on 16 volunteers, for which video recordings were carried out by themselves. The participants were also asked to wear the Go Direct respiratory belt for capturing reference data. The result revealed that our proposed measuring respiratory rate obtains root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.82±0.75 bpm. The advantage of this approach lies in its simplicity and accessibility to serve users who require monitoring the respiration during sleep without direct contact by themselves.Entities:
Keywords: body movements detection; natural sleep environments; non-contact monitoring; respiration monitoring; thermal imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33167556 PMCID: PMC7663997 DOI: 10.3390/s20216307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
A research review of the thermal imaging-based method for respiration monitoring of sleeping position.
| ROI Localization | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Subjects | Exp Duration | Controlled Env | Simulated | Selection/ | Area | Tracking |
| Usman et al. [ | Adult | 5 min | Yes | Yes | M | Nostrils | Yes |
| Fei et al. [ | Adult | 60 min | Yes | No | A-S | Nostrils | Yes |
| Al-Khalidi et al. [ | Children | 2 min | Yes | No | A-S | Tip of the nose | Yes |
| Hu et al. [ | Adult | 10 min | Yes | Yes | A-S | Nose, mouth | Yes |
| Abbas et al. [ | Infant | 2 min | Yes | No | M | Nostrils | No |
| Pereira et al. [ | Infant | 5 min | No | No | A-D | N/A | No |
| Lorato et al. [ | Adult | 2 min | Yes | Yes | A-D | N/A | No |
| Our proposed | Adult | 60–90 min | No | No | A-D | N/A | No |
M: Manually, A-S: Automatically Selection, A-D: Automatically Detection.
Figure 1Proposed method.
Figure 2The sample of three different sizes as , , and (red point indicates the highest temperature point).
Figure 3(a) All contours, (b) bounding rectangles around all contours, and (c) bounding rectangle around the most prominent contour.
Figure 4(a) Sample of fusion signal, (b) filtered and smoothed signals, (c) peak detection of experiment signal, and (d) peak detection of the reference signal.
Figure 5Sample output of the body movements detection.
Figure 6Data collection setup.
Participants Data.
| Subjects | Gender | Age (years) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | BMI (kg/m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S01 | F | 28 | 162 | 56 | 21.34 |
| S02 | F | 36 | 167 | 52 | 18.65 |
| S03 | F | 31 | 162 | 50 | 19.05 |
| S04 | F | 29 | 163 | 53 | 19.95 |
| S05 | F | 32 | 158 | 54 | 21.63 |
| S06 | M | 25 | 161 | 70 | 27.01 |
| S07 | F | 31 | 151 | 47 | 20.61 |
| S08 | F | 29 | 160 | 50 | 19.53 |
| S09 | M | 30 | 168 | 55 | 19.49 |
| S10 | F | 28 | 159 | 58 | 22.94 |
| S11 | M | 28 | 180 | 75 | 23.15 |
| S12 | M | 26 | 169 | 58 | 20.31 |
| S13 | M | 27 | 168 | 59 | 20.90 |
| S14 | M | 29 | 168 | 78 | 27.64 |
| S15 | F | 32 | 153 | 56 | 23.92 |
| S16 | F | 37 | 153 | 47 | 20.08 |
The result of respiratory rate estimation and body movements detection.
| Subjects | Respiratory Rate (bpm) | Body Movements | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration (s) | Reference | Experiment | RMSE | #Movements | #Frames | Duration (s) | Degree | |
| S01 | 5371.05 | 12.71 | 14.05 | 1.56 | 14 | 269 | 15.69 | 1.12 |
| S02 | 5397.54 | 13.69 | 14.22 | 1.11 | 15 | 199 | 11.65 | 0.78 |
| S03 | 5379.37 | 16.75 | 14.78 | 2.20 | 7 | 63 | 3.69 | 0.53 |
| S04 | 5192.31 | 12.23 | 13.37 | 2.00 | 35 | 642 | 37.86 | 1.08 |
| S05 | 5212.78 | 17.62 | 14.39 | 3.32 | 9 | 200 | 11.72 | 1.30 |
| S06 | 5200.51 | 16.45 | 14.48 | 2.23 | 9 | 214 | 12.53 | 1.39 |
| S07 | 5332.39 | 14.38 | 14.36 | 1.47 | 16 | 218 | 12.80 | 0.80 |
| S08 | 3495.39 | 14.65 | 14.29 | 1.18 | 15 | 749 | 43.48 | 2.90 |
| S09 | 5407.22 | 12.17 | 14.60 | 2.68 | 0 | 3 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| S10 | 4520.26 | 14.91 | 14.79 | 0.75 | 5 | 91 | 5.33 | 1.07 |
| S11 | 5346.70 | 13.12 | 13.76 | 1.25 | 16 | 417 | 24.42 | 1.53 |
| S12 | 5361.45 | 13.25 | 15.37 | 2.35 | 7 | 140 | 8.20 | 1.17 |
| S13 | 5399.74 | 18.61 | 15.99 | 2.79 | 5 | 20 | 1.17 | 0.23 |
| S14 | 5380.52 | 15.15 | 14.32 | 1.49 | 16 | 535 | 31.14 | 1.95 |
| S15 | 5315.23 | 16.32 | 14.40 | 1.99 | 12 | 225 | 13.19 | 1.10 |
| S16 | 4287.12 | 14.43 | 14.41 | 0.72 | 6 | 250 | 14.51 | 2.42 |
| Mean | 5100.00 | 14.78 | 14.47 | 1.82 | 1.21 | |||
| STD | 537.63 | 1.93 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.74 | |||
Figure 7The result of the RMSE (respiratory rate) and body movements of S01–S16.