| Literature DB >> 33167487 |
Muhammad Javaid Akhter1, Bo Melander1, Solvejg Kopp Mathiassen1, Rodrigo Labouriau2, Svend Vendelbo Nielsen2, Per Kudsk1.
Abstract
Vulpia myuros has become an increasing weed problem in winter cereals in Northern Europe. However, the information about V. myuros and its behavior as an arable weed is limited. Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted in 2017/18 and 2018/19, at the Department of Agroecology in Flakkebjerg, Denmark to investigate the emergence, phenological development and growth characteristics of V. myuros in monoculture and in mixture with winter wheat, in comparison to Apera spica-venti, Alopecurus myosuroides and Lolium multiflorum. V. myuros emerged earlier than A. myosuroides and A. spica-venti but later than L. multiflorum. Significant differences in phenological development were recorded among the species. Overall phenology of V. myuros was more similar to that of L. multiflorum than to A. myosuroides and A. spica-venti. V. myuros started seed shedding earlier than A. spica-venti and L. multiflorum but later than A. myosuroides. V. myuros was more sensitive to winter wheat competition in terms of biomass production and fecundity than the other species. Using a target-neighborhood design, responses of V. myuros and A. spica-venti to the increasing density of winter wheat were quantified. At early growth stages "BBCH 26-29", V. myuros was suppressed less than A. spica-venti by winter wheat, while opposite responses were seen at later growth stages "BBCH 39-47" and "BBCH 81-90". No significant differences in fecundity characteristics were observed between the two species in response to increasing winter wheat density. The information on the behavior of V. myuros gathered by the current study can support the development of effective integrated weed management strategies for V. myuros.Entities:
Keywords: competitive ability; emergence; fecundity; integrated weed management; seed shedding; target-neighborhood design
Year: 2020 PMID: 33167487 PMCID: PMC7694455 DOI: 10.3390/plants9111495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Weather data for 2017/18, 2018/19, and 10 yr means from 2011 to 2020. (A) Monthly average air temperature and (B) precipitation.
Figure 2Cumulative emergence dynamics of grass species as a function of thermal time (°C) in 2017/18 (A) and 2018/19 (B). Regression equation and parameter estimates given in Table 1.
Regression parameter estimates from log-logistic model Equation (1) for cumulative percent emergence of grass weeds in 2017/18 and 2018/19.
| Regression Parameters a | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GERM10 (°C) (95% CI) | GERM50 (°C) (95% CI) | GERM90 (°C) (95% CI) | ||||||
| 2017/18 | 2018/19 | 2017/18 | 2018/19 | 2017/18 | 2018/19 | 2017/18 | 2018/19 | |
|
| −5.0 (−5.4, −4.6) (1) | −4.9 (−5.3, −4.5) (1) | 127 (119–134) (1) | 152 (142–161) (1) | 197 (189–205) (1) | 237 (227–247) (1) | 305 (286–324) (1) | 371 (347–395) (1) |
|
| −5.7 (−6.2, −5.2) (2) | −9.5 (−10.4, −8.5) (2) | 122 (116–128) (2) | 158 (153–163) (2) | 179 (173–186) (2) | 199 (195–203) (2) | 263 (248–277) (2) | 251 (242–260) (2) |
|
| −5.0 (−5.5, −4.7) (3) | −5.0 (-5.4, −4.5) (3) | 144 (136–151) (3) | 161 (152–170) (3) | 221 (212–230) (3) | 250 (240–260) (3) | 340 (320–361) (3) | 389 (364–414) (3) |
|
| −4.8 (−5.2, −4.4) (4) | −5.2 (−5.6, −4.7) (4) | 168 (156–178) (4) | 188 (178–198) (4) | 265 (254–276) (4) | 288 (276–299) (4) | 418 (393–444) (4) | 440 (412–468) (4) |
| Significance levels b | 1 vs. 2, | 1 vs. 2, | 1 vs. 2, | 1 vs. 2, | 1 vs. 2, | 1 vs. 2, | 1 vs. 2, | 1 vs. 2, |
| 1 vs. 3, | 1 vs. 3, | 1 vs. 3, | 1 vs. 3, | 1 vs. 3, | 1 vs. 3, | 1 vs. 3, | 1 vs. 3, | |
| 1 vs. 4, | 1 vs. 4, | 1 vs. 4, | 1 vs. 4, | 1 vs. 4, | 1 vs. 4, | 1 vs. 4, | 1 vs. 4, | |
| 2 vs. 3, | 2 vs. 3, | 2 vs. 3, | 2 vs. 3, | 2 vs. 3, | 2 vs. 3, | 2 vs. 3, | 2 vs. 3, | |
| 2 vs. 4, | 2 vs. 4, | 2 vs. 4, | 2 vs. 4, | 2 vs. 4, | 2 vs. 4, | 2 vs. 4, | 2 vs. 4, | |
| 3 vs. 4, | 3 vs. 4, | 3 vs. 4, | 3 vs. 4, | 3 vs. 4, | 3 vs. 4, | 3 vs. 4, | 3 vs. 4, | |
a E(t) = 1/(1 + exp[b(log(t) − log(GERM50))]). E is the cumulative emergence, GERM50 is the thermal time in needed to attain 50% emergence and b is the rate of emergence. b Parameter estimates were compared within a year by t-tests at the 5% level of significance. c Abbreviations: b = emergence rate; CI = confidence interval; GERM10, GERM50, and GERM90 = thermal time (°C) needed for 10%, 50% and 90% emergence, respectively.
Figure 3Thermal time (°C) for the grass weeds and winter wheat to reach various phenological stages in 2017/18 (A) and 2018/19 (B). Mean values and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals are presented in supplementary material (Table S1 (2017/18) and Table S2 (2018/19)).
Figure 4Per plant biomass accumulation of V. myuros, L. multiflorum and A. myosuroides grown in the absence and presence of winter wheat crop in relation to thermal time (°C) in 2017/18 (A) and 2018/19 (B). Regression equation and parameter estimates given in Table 2 (2017/18) and Table 3 (2018/19).
Regression parameter estimates from weibull function Equation (2) fitted to per plant biomass accumulation of grass weeds in the absence and presence of winter wheat in 2017/18. Regression estimates were compared within grasses grown in the absence and presence of winter wheat at the 5% level of significance. Standard errors are given in parentheses.
| Regression Parameters a | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| TIME50 (°C) |
| |||||||
| Weed species | −Wheat c | +Wheat | −Wheat | +Wheat | −Wheat | +Wheat | Ratio b | ||
|
| 11.4 (2.1) | ns | 8.3 (31.2) | 1317.0 (19.6) | ns | 1020.0 (587.7) | 14.8 (0.7) | 1.5 (0.6) | 0.11 (0.04) |
|
| 6.0 (1.3) | ns | 4.5 (2.3) | 1251.0 (37.2) | ns | 1235.0 (178.3) | 14.9 (1.2) | 6.2 (2.2) | 0.42 (0.15) |
|
| 8.7 (2.3) | ns | 5.6 (2.4) | 1230.0 (23.5) | ns | 1016.0 (107.7) | 16.4 (0.7) | 4.7 (0.5) | 0.29 (0.04) |
a Y is biomass accumulation of grasses; c is rate of biomass production, TIME50 is the thermal time (°C) needed to produce 50% of biomass, d is upper limit indicating total plant biomass. b Estimated ratio in d value at the 5% level of significance within grass species that grew in the presence and absence of winter wheat. A lower ratio indicates a greater sensitivity of a species to produce biomass with winter wheat competition. ns, nonsignificant (nonsignificant difference within grass species when they grew in the absence and presence of winter wheat). c Abbreviation: −Wheat indicating when grasses grew in the absence of winter wheat; +Wheat indicating when grasses grew in the presence of winter wheat
Regression parameter estimates from log-logistic function fitted to per plant biomass accumulation of grass weeds in the absence and presence of winter wheat in 2018/19. Regression estimates were compared within grasses when they were grown in the absence and presence of crop at the 5% level of significance. Standard errors are given in the parenthesis.
| Regression Parameters a | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| TIME50 (°C) |
| |||||||
| Weed species | −Wheat c | +Wheat | −Wheat | +Wheat | −Wheat | +Wheat | Ratio b | ||
|
| −10.1 (1.7) | ns | −9.5 (5.9) | 1548.0 (36.5) | ns | 1384.0 (124.6) | 29.3 (2.6) | 5.4 (1.2) | 0.18 (0.04) |
|
| −11.7 (2.6) | ns | −15.4 (5.5) | 1380.0 (38.2) | ns | 1343.0 (44.8) | 15.2 (1.2) | 10.3 (1.0) | 0.68 (0.08) |
|
| −9.8 (1.7) | ns | −17.3 (14.4) | 1319.0 (34.9) | ns | 1263.0 (51.7) | 22.0 (1.6) | 7.1 (0.9) | 0.32 (0.05) |
a Y is biomass accumulation of grasses, c is rate of biomass production, TIME50 is the thermal time (°C) needed to produce 50% of biomass, d is upper limit indicating total plant biomass b. Estimated ratio in d value at the 5% level of significance within grass species that grew in the presence and absence of wheat. A lower ratio indicates a greater sensitivity of a species to produce biomass with winter wheat competition. ns, nonsignificant (nonsignificant difference within grass species when they grew in the absence and presence of wheat). c Abbreviation: −Wheat indicating when grasses grew in the absence of wheat; +Wheat indicating when grasses grew in the presence of wheat.
Mean per plant seed production and ratio of seed production of annual grass weeds in the presence and absence of winter wheat. For grass species with the same labels (c and d) indicate that the ratio did not differ significantly. 95% bootstrap confidence intervals are given in parentheses.
| 2017/18 | 2018/19 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −Wheat a | +Wheat | ratio b | −Wheat | +Wheat | Ratio | |
|
| 14478 (7833–22715) | 574 (472–678) | 0.04 (0.02–0.07) c | 16680 (15019–18446) | 1822 (1509–2169) | 0.11 c (0.10–0.12) |
|
| 2364 (2136–2724) | 426 (339–818) | 0.20 (0.16–0.25) d | 4264 (3691–4774) | 958 (752–1158) | 0.22 d (0.20–0.24) |
|
| 4896 (4320–5504) | 891 (702–1097) | 0.19 (0.14–0.24) d | 12120 (10119–14143) | 2912 (2172–3787) | 0.24 d (0.21–0.27) |
a Abbreviation: −Wheat means that the grasses grew in the absence of winter wheat; +Wheat means that the grasses grew in the presence of winter wheat. b Ratio of seed production in the presence and absence of crop, lower ratio indicates the higher sensitivity of a species to produce seeds with crop competition.
The estimated effective density of winter wheat (DENS50) required to suppress 50% responses of V. myuros and A. spica-venti against increasing winter wheat densities at two different crop growth stages (1–2-leaf stage, 3–4-leaf stage) in 2017/18 and 2018/19 using a target-neighborhood design. Values in parentheses indicate standard errors. DENS50 (winter wheat plants m−2) parameter obtained by using two parametric non-linear hyperbolic equation a.
| 2017/18 Experiment | 1-2-Leaf Stage | 3-4-Leaf Stage | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant traits | Harvest time | Significance level b | Significance level b | Significance level c | ||||
| Biomass | BBCH (26–29) | 104 (21.0) | 35 (9.7) | 51 (25.8) | ns | 16 (7.2) | 1 vs. 3, | |
| BBCH (39–47) | 28 (6.1) | 92 (31.0) | 47 (39.3) | ns | 52 (23.0) | 1 vs. 3 = ns, 2 vs. 4 = ns | ||
| BBCH (81–90) | 30 (5.6) | 82 (24.4) | 11 (3.52) | ns | 24 (11.7) | 1 vs. 3, | ||
| Potential seed production | BBCH (81–90) | 39 (7.7) | ns | 35 (8.9) | 16 (7.39) | ns | 20 (7.7) | 1 vs. 3, |
|
| ||||||||
| Biomass | BBCH (26–29) | 30 (4.0) | ns | 17 (4.4) | 24 (10.2) | ns | 14 (12.7) | 1 vs. 3 = ns, 2 vs. 4 = ns |
| BBCH (39–47) | 10 (4.5) | 29 (6.8) | 9 (9.4) | ns | 14 (7.4) | 1 vs. 3 = ns, 2 vs. 4 = ns | ||
| BBCH (81–90) | 14 (5.9) | 51 (9.2) | 7 (3.4) | ns | 14 (4.2) | 1 vs. 3 = ns, 2 vs. 4, | ||
| Potential seed production | BBCH (81–90) | 18 (4.6) | ns | 43 (15.8) | 6 (2.5) | ns | 14 (7.8) | 1 vs. 3, |
a Y is response variable, x denotes wheat density (plant m−2), a is the response of target plant growing alone, DENS50 is the effective density of winter wheat reducing response of target plant by 50%. b Parameter estimates were compared between species by t-tests at the 5% level of significance. c Parameter estimates were compared between crop growth stages within target plants. ns, nonsignificant difference.