Literature DB >> 33167056

[Regional distribution of the cochlear implant (CI) centers in Germany].

T Stöver1, R Zeh2, B Gängler2, S K Plontke3, S Ohligmacher2, T Deitmer4, O Hupka2, H J Welkoborsky5, M Schulz2, W Delank6, M Strobel2, O Guntinas-Lichius7, S Lang8, A Dietz9, S Dazert10, M Diensthuber1.   

Abstract

The treatment of patients with severe hearing loss or deafness with a cochlear implant (CI) represents a standard in Germany today. However, there is hardly any data on the current number of clinical CI centers (CI clinics) and their geographical distribution. The patient self-help organization, German Cochlear Implant Society (DCIG), and the German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC) have therefore initiated a survey to determine the regional distribution, the range of services, the consideration of existing quality standards and cooperation with patient self-help organizations of the individual clinical CI centers.For this purpose, a total number of 170 ENT departments or their directors (37 professors and 133 chief physicians), respectively, were contacted by e-mail and provided with a questionnaire. The survey took place from October 2019 to February 2020.Of the 170 departments contacted, 71 (41.8 %) took part in the survey. Of these, 70 departments (98.6 %) confirmed to perform CI surgeries. Thus, 41.8 % of all clinics contacted reported to perform CI surgeries (70 of 170 clinics), while this information was not available from 99 clinics. All 70 clinical CI centers (100 %) reported to conduct CI surgeries on adults, 60 centers (85.7 %) also on children (< 18 years). 36 departments (51.4 %) reported that the total number of CI surgeries at their facility in 2018 was more than 50. In 64 departments (91.4 %), the recommendations of the DGHNO-KHC on CI care (according to the White Paper CI care 2018) were followed. A collaboration between the department and patient self-help organization was confirmed by 67 institutions (95.7 %). The geographical distribution of the clinical CI centers showed a heterogeneous distribution pattern between the individual federal states and also within the respective federal state.The work presented here is a first assessment of the situation with regard to the regional distribution of clinical CI centers in Germany. A clustering of CI centers was noticeable in metropolitan areas, sometimes with several facilities in one city. The predominant attention to quality-related aspects, such as the consideration of the DGHNO-KHC white paper and the cooperation with patient self-help, is gratifying. The limitations of the study result from limited participation in the survey (41.8 % of the contacted clinics). Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33167056     DOI: 10.1055/a-1302-0368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  2 in total

1.  [Electronic learning for otorhinolaryngology students using the content management system ILIAS].

Authors:  Sara M van Bonn; Jan S Grajek; Wilma Großmann; Hans E Bernd; Stefanie Rettschlag; Robert Mlynski; Nora M Weiss
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Quality control in cochlear implant therapy: clinical practice guidelines and registries in European countries.

Authors:  A Loth; C Vazzana; M Leinung; D Guderian; C Issing; U Baumann; T Stöver
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.236

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.