Apostolos D Prodromidis1,2, Chrysoula Drosatou3, Georgios C Thivaios4, Nasri Zreik1, Charalambos P Charalambous2,5. 1. Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Trauma & Orthopaedics, Liverpool, UK. 2. University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. 3. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Athens, Greece. 4. Laiko General Hospital, Orthopaedics, Athens, Greece. 5. Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Orthopaedics, Blackpool, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is unclear with regard to meniscal insult. PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development of meniscal tears within this period. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears. RESULTS: After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2 prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated, ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended. REGISTRATION: CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO).
BACKGROUND:Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is unclear with regard to meniscal insult. PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development of meniscal tears within this period. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears. RESULTS: After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2 prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated, ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended. REGISTRATION: CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO).
Authors: David Y Ding; Richard N Chang; Sachin Allahabadi; Monica J Coughlan; Heather A Prentice; Gregory B Maletis Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 4.114