Literature DB >> 33166226

The impact of extreme reuse and extended wear conditions on protection provided by a surgical-style N95 filtering facepiece respirator.

Scott Duncan1, Paul Bodurtha1, Cara Bourgeois1, Eva Dickson1, Cheryl Jensen1, Syed Naqvi1.   

Abstract

Most respirators employed in health care settings, and often in first responder and industrial settings, are intended for single-use: the user dons the respirator, performs a work activity, and then doffs and discards the respirator. However, in the current COVID-19 pandemic, in the presence of persistent shortages of personal protective equipment, extended use and reuse of filtering facepiece respirators are routinely contemplated by many health care organizations. Further, there is considerable current effort to understand the effect of sterilization on the possibility of reuse, and some investigations of performance have been conducted. While the ability of such a respirator to continue to provide effective protection after repeated sanitization cycles is a critical component of implementing its reuse, of equal importance is an understanding of the impact that reusing the respirator multiple times in a day while performing work tasks, and even extending its wear over multiple days, has on the workplace protective performance. In this study, we subjected a stockpiled quantitatively fitted surgical style N95 filtering facepiece respirator device to extreme reuse and extended wear conditions (up to 19 uses over a duration of 5 days) and measured its protective performance at regular intervals, including simulated workplace protection factor measurements using total inward leakage. With this respirator, it was shown to be possible to maintain protection corresponding to an assigned protection factor greater than 10 under extreme usage conditions provided an individual is properly trained in the use of, and expertly fitted in, the respirator. Other factors such as hygiene and strap breakage are likely to place limits on reuse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Condensation particle counter; pandemic; quantitative respirator fit testing; simulated workplace protection factor

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33166226     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1829633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  3 in total

1.  Impact of Wearing on Filtration Performance of Electrostatic Filter Face Masks.

Authors:  Anthony P Pierlot; David L J Alexander; Jürg A Schütz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Vapourized Hydrogen Peroxide Decontamination in a Hospital Setting Inactivates SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E without Compromising Filtration Efficiency of Unexpired N95 Respirators.

Authors:  Natasha Christie-Holmes; Rachel Tyli; Patrick Budylowski; Furkan Guvenc; Amit Weiner; Betty Poon; Mary Speck; Stephenie Naugler; Allen Rainville; Ayoob Ghalami; Shannon McCaw; Steven Hayes; Samira Mubareka; Scott D Gray-Owen; Ori D Rotstein; Rita A Kandel; James A Scott
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Ultraviolet-C Irradiation, Heat, and Storage as Potential Methods of Inactivating SARS-CoV-2 and Bacterial Pathogens on Filtering Facepiece Respirators.

Authors:  Rhodri Harfoot; Deborah B Y Yung; William A Anderson; Cervantée E K Wild; Nicolene Coetzee; Leonor C Hernández; Blair Lawley; Daniel Pletzer; José G B Derraik; Yvonne C Anderson; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-01-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.