Literature DB >> 33166148

Complex Roles of PsbS and Xanthophylls in the Regulation of Nonphotochemical Quenching in Arabidopsis thaliana under Fluctuating Light.

Collin J Steen1,2,3, Jonathan M Morris2,3,4, Audrey H Short2,3,5, Krishna K Niyogi2,6, Graham R Fleming1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Protection of photosystem II against damage from excess light by nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) includes responses on a wide range of timescales. The onset of the various phases of NPQ overlap in time making it difficult to discern if they influence each other or involve different photophysical mechanisms. To unravel the complex relationship of the known actors in NPQ, we perform fluorescence lifetime snapshot measurements throughout multiple cycles of alternating 2 min periods of high light and darkness. By comparing the data with an empirically based mathematical model that describes both fast and slow quenching responses, we suggest that the rapidly reversible quenching response depends on the state of the slower response. By studying a series of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants, we find that removing zeaxanthin (Zea) or enhancing PsbS concentration, for example, influences the amplitudes of the slow quenching induction and recovery, but not the timescales. The plants' immediate response to high light appears independent of the illumination history, while PsbS and Zea have distinct roles in both quenching and recovery. We further identify two parameters in our model that predominately influence the recovery amplitude and propose that our approach may prove useful for screening new mutants or overexpressors with enhanced biomass yields under field conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33166148     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c06265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  7 in total

Review 1.  A perspective on the major light-harvesting complex dynamics under the effect of pH, salts, and the photoprotective PsbS protein.

Authors:  Eleni Navakoudis; Taxiarchis Stergiannakos; Vangelis Daskalakis
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  Light quality as a driver of photosynthetic apparatus development.

Authors:  Galina V Kochetova; Olga V Avercheva; Elizaveta M Bassarskaya; Tatiana V Zhigalova
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  Non-Photochemical Quenching under Drought and Fluctuating Light.

Authors:  Artur Nosalewicz; Karolina Okoń; Maria Skorupka
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Static Disorder has Dynamic Impact on Energy Transport in Biomimetic Light-Harvesting Complexes.

Authors:  Leo M Hamerlynck; Amanda J Bischoff; Julia R Rogers; Trevor D Roberts; Jing Dai; Phillip L Geissler; Matthew B Francis; Naomi S Ginsberg
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Interplay between LHCSR proteins and state transitions governs the NPQ response in Chlamydomonas during light fluctuations.

Authors:  Collin J Steen; Adrien Burlacot; Audrey H Short; Krishna K Niyogi; Graham R Fleming
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 7.947

6.  Light Harvesting in Fluctuating Environments: Evolution and Function of Antenna Proteins across Photosynthetic Lineage.

Authors:  Pushan Bag
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-10

7.  Protection of photosystem I during sudden light stress depends on ferredoxin:NADP(H) reductase abundance and interactions.

Authors:  Melvin Rodriguez-Heredia; Francesco Saccon; Sam Wilson; Giovanni Finazzi; Alexander V Ruban; Guy T Hanke
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 8.340

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.