Betül Sözeri1, Ferhat Demir2, Hafize Emine Sönmez3, Şerife Gül Karadağ3, Yasemin Kendir Demirkol4, Özlem Akgün Doğan4, Hamdi Levent Doğanay5, Nuray Aktay Ayaz3. 1. Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. drferhat@outlook.com. 3. Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Pediatric Genetics, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. 5. Genomic Laboratory (GLAB), Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/ OBJECTIVES: The clinicians initially prefer to define patients with the systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID)'s based on recommended clinical classification criteria; then, they confirm the diagnosis with genetic testing. We aimed to compare the initial phenotypic diagnoses of the patients who were followed up with the preliminary diagnosis of a monogenic SAID, and the genotypic results obtained from the next-generation sequence (NGS) panel. METHOD: Seventy-one patients with the preliminary diagnosis of cryopyrin-associated periodic fever syndrome (CAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), or tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS) were included in the study. The demographic data, clinical findings, laboratory results, and treatments were recorded. All patients were examined by NGS panel analysis including 16 genes. The genetic results were compared with the initial Federici score to determine whether they were compatible with each other. RESULTS: Thirty patients were initially classified as MKD, 22 as CAPS, and 19 as TRAPS. The frequency of clinical manifestations was urticarial rash 57.7%, diarrhea 49.2%, abdominal pain 47.8%, arthralgia 45%, oral aphthae 43.6%, myalgia 32.3%, tonsillitis 28.1%, and conjunctivitis 25.3%, respectively. After NGS gene panel screening, 13 patients were diagnosed with CAPS, 8 with MKD, 7 with familial Mediterranean fever, 5 with TRAPS, and 2 with NLRP12-associated periodic syndrome. The remaining 36 patients were genetically identified as undefined SAID since they were not classified as one of the defined SAIDs after the result of the NGS panel. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that clinical diagnostic criteria may not always be sufficient to establish the correct diagnosis. There is still low accordance between clinical diagnoses and molecular analyses. In the case of a patient with a preliminary diagnosis of a monogenic SAID with the negative result of target gene analysis, other autoinflammatory diseases should also be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis. Key Points • Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases can present with different clinical manifestations. • The clinical diagnostic criteria may not always be sufficient to reach the correct diagnosis in autoinflammatory diseases. • In the case of a patient with a preliminary diagnosis of a monogenic SAID with the negative result of target gene analysis, other autoinflammatory diseases should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis.
INTRODUCTION/ OBJECTIVES: The clinicians initially prefer to define patients with the systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID)'s based on recommended clinical classification criteria; then, they confirm the diagnosis with genetic testing. We aimed to compare the initial phenotypic diagnoses of the patients who were followed up with the preliminary diagnosis of a monogenic SAID, and the genotypic results obtained from the next-generation sequence (NGS) panel. METHOD: Seventy-one patients with the preliminary diagnosis of cryopyrin-associated periodic fever syndrome (CAPS), mevalonate kinasedeficiency (MKD), or tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS) were included in the study. The demographic data, clinical findings, laboratory results, and treatments were recorded. All patients were examined by NGS panel analysis including 16 genes. The genetic results were compared with the initial Federici score to determine whether they were compatible with each other. RESULTS: Thirty patients were initially classified as MKD, 22 as CAPS, and 19 as TRAPS. The frequency of clinical manifestations was urticarial rash 57.7%, diarrhea 49.2%, abdominal pain 47.8%, arthralgia 45%, oral aphthae 43.6%, myalgia 32.3%, tonsillitis 28.1%, and conjunctivitis 25.3%, respectively. After NGS gene panel screening, 13 patients were diagnosed with CAPS, 8 with MKD, 7 with familial Mediterranean fever, 5 with TRAPS, and 2 with NLRP12-associated periodic syndrome. The remaining 36 patients were genetically identified as undefined SAID since they were not classified as one of the defined SAIDs after the result of the NGS panel. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that clinical diagnostic criteria may not always be sufficient to establish the correct diagnosis. There is still low accordance between clinical diagnoses and molecular analyses. In the case of a patient with a preliminary diagnosis of a monogenic SAID with the negative result of target gene analysis, other autoinflammatory diseases should also be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis. Key Points • Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases can present with different clinical manifestations. • The clinical diagnostic criteria may not always be sufficient to reach the correct diagnosis in autoinflammatory diseases. • In the case of a patient with a preliminary diagnosis of a monogenic SAID with the negative result of target gene analysis, other autoinflammatory diseases should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis.