Literature DB >> 3316512

Coordinated use of sequentially escalated cyclophosphamide and cell-cycle-specific chemotherapy (N4SE protocol) for advanced neuroblastoma: experience with 100 patients.

B H Kushner1, L Helson.   

Abstract

A rationally devised induction regimen of vincristine, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and sequentially-escalated cyclophosphamide (CPM), followed by S-phase-specific agents (5-fluorouracil [5-FU]/cytosine arabinoside [ara-C]/hydroxyurea), was used in 100 patients with neuroblastoma. Of 17 patients under 1 year of age at diagnosis, complete (CR)/good partial (GPR) responses with long-term disease-free survival were achieved in 11 (85%) of 13 new patients and in two of four previously treated patients; six of the GPRs also received myeloablative therapy with autologous bone marrow rescue to consolidate remission status. The 83 patients over 1 year of age at diagnosis included three groups: (1) 36 new patients whose N4SE included maximal-dose CPM (ie, up to 140 to 160 mg/kg/course); (2) an earlier group of 18 new patients whose N4SE included moderate-dose CPM (ie, up to 80 mg/kg/course); and (3) 29 previously treated patients who all received the maximal-dose N4SE regimen. For new patients, CR/GPR rates were 72% in the maximal-dose group v 39% in the earlier moderate-dose group (P = .029). A CR/GPR rate of 41% and a partial response rate of 17% were observed for the 29 previously treated patients, all but two of whom had large tumor burdens after therapy that included moderate doses of CPM. Despite consolidation with myeloablative therapy, many responders in the three groups ultimately relapsed. The N4SE was strongly myelosuppressive, but only two patients died from associated infection. Extramedullary toxicity was limited to hemorrhagic cystitis in four of 33 CPM previously treated patients; this problem did not occur in the 67 new patients. The data indicate that the maximal-dose N4SE is an effective induction regimen for neuroblastoma, can achieve marked regressions of disease resistant to less intensive therapy, and is sparing of major body organs. This high rate of remission induction must be coupled with improvements in consolidation therapy to assure long-term disease-free survival of poor-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3316512     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.11.1746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  4 in total

Review 1.  Where next with therapy in advanced neuroblastoma?

Authors:  C R Pinkerton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Short duration, high dose, alternating chemotherapy in metastatic neuroblastoma. (ENSG 3C induction regimen). The European Neuroblastoma Study Group.

Authors:  C R Pinkerton; J M Zucker; O Hartmann; J Pritchard; V Broadbent; P Morris-Jones; F Breatnach; A E Craft; A D Pearson; K R Wallendszus
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Double megatherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced neuroblastoma: the LMCE2 study.

Authors:  T Philip; R Ladenstein; J M Zucker; R Pinkerton; E Bouffet; D Louis; W Siegert; J L Bernard; D Frappaz; C Coze
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Integrative omics reveals MYCN as a global suppressor of cellular signalling and enables network-based therapeutic target discovery in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  David J Duffy; Aleksandar Krstic; Melinda Halasz; Thomas Schwarzl; Dirk Fey; Kristiina Iljin; Jai Prakash Mehta; Kate Killick; Jenny Whilde; Benedetta Turriziani; Saija Haapa-Paananen; Vidal Fey; Matthias Fischer; Frank Westermann; Kai-Oliver Henrich; Steffen Bannert; Desmond G Higgins; Walter Kolch
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-12-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.