Wei Duan1, Xinyuan Chen1, Ya-Jie Wang1, Wenrui Zhao1, Hong Yuan2, Xu Lei3. 1. Sleep and NeuroImaging Center, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China; Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, 400715, China. 2. Sleep and NeuroImaging Center, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China; Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, 400715, China; National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Southwest University), Chongqing, 400715, China. 3. Sleep and NeuroImaging Center, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China; Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, Chongqing, 400715, China; National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Southwest University), Chongqing, 400715, China. Electronic address: xlei@swu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Characteristics from resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) provides relevant information about individual differences in cognitive tasks and personality traits. Due to its increasing application, it is crucial to know the reproducibility of several analysis measures of rsEEG. NEW METHOD: A new brain network construction method was proposed based on simplified forward model (SFM). In addition, we aimed to carry out an extensive examination of the reproducibility of the power spectrum and functional connectivity at both the sensor-level and the source-level. We systematically proposed multiple new pipelines by integration source imaging, time-course extraction and network reconstruction. RESULTS/COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Our results revealed that the reproducibility of eyes-closed was slightly higher than that of eyes-open, and the relative power was more repeatable than the absolute power, especially in high-frequency bands. The reproducibility of the sensor-level was higher than that of the source-level, both for power and connectivity. Remarkably, connectivity measures could be separated into two classes according to their reproducibility. Notably, the reproducibility of power envelope correlation (PEC) was generally the highest among those connectivity measures which are insensitive to volume conduction effect. For the whole-brain network construction, single dipole modeling was better than the dimensionality reduction methods, such as mean or principal component analysis (PCA) of multiple dipoles of a region. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our results described the reproducibility of rsEEG power spectrum, connectivity measures, and network constructions, which could be considered in assessing inter-individual differences in brain-behavior relationships, as well as automatic biometric applications.
BACKGROUND: Characteristics from resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) provides relevant information about individual differences in cognitive tasks and personality traits. Due to its increasing application, it is crucial to know the reproducibility of several analysis measures of rsEEG. NEW METHOD: A new brain network construction method was proposed based on simplified forward model (SFM). In addition, we aimed to carry out an extensive examination of the reproducibility of the power spectrum and functional connectivity at both the sensor-level and the source-level. We systematically proposed multiple new pipelines by integration source imaging, time-course extraction and network reconstruction. RESULTS/COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Our results revealed that the reproducibility of eyes-closed was slightly higher than that of eyes-open, and the relative power was more repeatable than the absolute power, especially in high-frequency bands. The reproducibility of the sensor-level was higher than that of the source-level, both for power and connectivity. Remarkably, connectivity measures could be separated into two classes according to their reproducibility. Notably, the reproducibility of power envelope correlation (PEC) was generally the highest among those connectivity measures which are insensitive to volume conduction effect. For the whole-brain network construction, single dipole modeling was better than the dimensionality reduction methods, such as mean or principal component analysis (PCA) of multiple dipoles of a region. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our results described the reproducibility of rsEEG power spectrum, connectivity measures, and network constructions, which could be considered in assessing inter-individual differences in brain-behavior relationships, as well as automatic biometric applications.
Authors: Eva M M Strijbis; Yannick S S Timar; Deborah N Schoonhoven; Ilse M Nauta; Shanna D Kulik; Lodewijk R J de Ruiter; Menno M Schoonheim; Arjan Hillebrand; Cornelis J Stam Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 5.152
Authors: Claudio Babiloni; Xianghong Arakaki; Hamed Azami; Karim Bennys; Katarzyna Blinowska; Laura Bonanni; Ana Bujan; Maria C Carrillo; Andrzej Cichocki; Jaisalmer de Frutos-Lucas; Claudio Del Percio; Bruno Dubois; Rebecca Edelmayer; Gary Egan; Stephane Epelbaum; Javier Escudero; Alan Evans; Francesca Farina; Keith Fargo; Alberto Fernández; Raffaele Ferri; Giovanni Frisoni; Harald Hampel; Michael G Harrington; Vesna Jelic; Jaeseung Jeong; Yang Jiang; Maciej Kaminski; Voyko Kavcic; Kerry Kilborn; Sanjeev Kumar; Alice Lam; Lew Lim; Roberta Lizio; David Lopez; Susanna Lopez; Brendan Lucey; Fernando Maestú; William J McGeown; Ian McKeith; Davide Vito Moretti; Flavio Nobili; Giuseppe Noce; John Olichney; Marco Onofrj; Ricardo Osorio; Mario Parra-Rodriguez; Tarek Rajji; Petra Ritter; Andrea Soricelli; Fabrizio Stocchi; Ioannis Tarnanas; John Paul Taylor; Stefan Teipel; Federico Tucci; Mitchell Valdes-Sosa; Pedro Valdes-Sosa; Marco Weiergräber; Gorsev Yener; Bahar Guntekin Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 16.655
Authors: Sungkean Kim; Ji Hyun Baek; Se-Hoon Shim; Young Joon Kwon; Hwa Young Lee; Jae Hyun Yoo; Ji Sun Kim Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Henrik Heitmann; Cristina Gil Ávila; Moritz M Nickel; Son Ta Dinh; Elisabeth S May; Laura Tiemann; Vanessa D Hohn; Thomas R Tölle; Markus Ploner Journal: Pain Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 7.926