Literature DB >> 33164796

Identification of a dominant CD8+ CTL epitope in the SARS-associated coronavirus 2 spike protein.

Daisuke Muraoka1, Deng Situo2, Shin-Ichi Sawada3, Kazunari Akiyoshi3, Naozumi Harada4, Hiroaki Ikeda2.   

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (n class="Disease">COVID-19), which is caused by SARS-CoV-2, has been spreading throughout the world. To date, there are still no approved human vaccines for this disease. To develop an effective vaccine, the establishment of animal models for evaluating post-vaccination immune responses is necessary. In this study, we have identified a CTL epitope in the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein that could be used to measure the cellular immune response against this protein. Potential predicted CTL epitopes of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein were investigated by immunizing BALB/c mice with a recombinant of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S protein. Then, CD8+ T cells specific for S-RBD were detected by stimulating with potential epitope peptides and then measuring the interferon-gamma production. Truncation of this peptide revealed that S-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells recognized a H2-Dd-restricted S526-533 peptide. In conclusion, this animal model is suitable for evaluating the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; CTL epitope; SARS-CoV-2; Spike protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33164796      PMCID: PMC7571903          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (n class="Species">SARS-CoV-2), the causal agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was identified in China in late 2019 [1], [2]. As of July 19, 2020, more than 14,307,865 individuals from multiple countries have been infected by this virus, with related deaths totaling 602,525 (https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6). The COVID-19 pandemic has inflicted unprecedented losses both in terms of human lives and global economies. Currently, there are still no approved vaccines available for controlling the rapid and global spread of this disease. Truly effective vaccines for the prevention of COVID-19 are an urgent need worldwide. Various virus-, DNA-, mRNA-, and protein-based vaccines are being developed throughout the world. Almost all of these vaccines contain the whole spike (S) protein or its receptor-binding domain (RBD) as the antigen. SARS-CoV-2 contains four main structural proteins: the envelope (E), membrane (M), nucleocapsid (N), and S proteins. The RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 (hereinafter S-RBD) binds specifically and efficiently to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and thereby supports the entry of the virus into the host cell. It has been shown that neutralizing antibodies recognizing the RBD or other portions of the S protein block the binding of the protein to ACE2, thus preventing the infection of SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses [3], [4], [5], [6]. Therefore, many of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development aim to induce S-RBD- or S protein-specific neutralizing antibodies by using the RBD or other parts of the S protein as an immunogen. However, it was recently revealed that the durability of the humoral immune response to SARS-Cov2 is short [7] (uene">npublished data at https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.09.20148429). Furthermore, researchers have reported that plasma levels of the S1 proteiene">n-specific neutraliziene">ng aene">ntibody were uene">nder the detectable level iene">n a number of n class="Species">patients who had recovered from COVID-19 (Wu et al. unpublished data at https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047365). T cells specific to SARS-CoV-2 epitopes have been detected in non-exposed healthy individuals [8]. Moreover, it has been reported that SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell immune memory is induced in convalescent COVID-19 patients [9]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the percentage of activated and proliferating virus-specific CD8+ T cells, such as spike-specific CD8+ T cells, is higher in mild patients, as compared to that in severe COVID-19 patients [10]. Furthermore, studies of SARS-CoV indicate that cellular immune responses induced by SARS-CoV infections have persisted for 11 years and that memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) contributed to protection from SARS-CoV re-challenge in mice [11], [12]. On the basis of these data, it is considered that the induction of a T-cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2 is important for protecting against COVID-19 development. These data also suggest that the capability of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to induce not only a humoral but also a cellular response should be taken into account in the development of vaccines and in their preclinical and clinical evaluations. Some animal models, including macaques and mice, were reported to be useful for the evaluation of the immunogenicity and/or efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines [6], [13], [14]. In particular, mouse models would be useful for the early research of vaccines. However, methods to measure CD8+ CTL responses to specific SARS-CoV-2-derived antigens in mice have not been established. In particular, methods for evaluating the cellular immune responses against spike protein are essential because SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are being developed using this protein as an immunogen. In this study, we found that an epitope peptide (S526–533) that is located at the C-terminus of S-RBD is recognized by CD8+ CTLs in BALB/c mice in a H2-Dd-dependent manner. This is the first identification of a SARS-CoV-2-derived CTL epitope in mice that allows for the precise evaluation of the capability of candidate vaccines to induce a cellular immune response against S-RBD.

Materials and methods

Mice

Female BALB/c mice were purchased from n class="Gene">SLC Japan (Shizuoka, Japan) and used at 7–11 weeks of age. They were maintained at the Animal Center of Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine (Nagasaki, Japan). The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee for Animal Experimentation of Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine.

Antibodies and reagents

The S-RBD protein of SARS-CoV-2 (amiene">no acid residues (aa) 319–541) was purchased from RayBiotech (Peachtree Corene">ners, GA, USA). Aene">nti-n class="Gene">H2-Kd (SF1-1.1.1, mouse Ig2a) and anti-H2-Kd/Dd (34–1-2S, mouse IgG2a) antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD8 mAb (53–6.7, rat IgG2a) was purchased from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA). Allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-interferon-gamma (anti-IFN-γ; clone XMG1.2) was purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). Synthetic S-RBD peptides (summarized in Table 1 ) and 9 m peptide (QYIHSANVL) were obtained from Genscript (Tokyo, Japan). A synthetic oligonucleotide containing an unmethylated CpG dinucleotide (CpG ODN 1668; 5ʹ-TCCATGACGTTCCTGATGCT-3ʹ) was synthesized by Hokkaido System Science (Sapporo, Japan).
Table 1

List of tested peptide.

Peptide IDstartendlengthsequence
#13273359VRFPNITNL
#23503589VYAWNRKRI
#336939022YNSASFSTFKCYGVSPTKLNDL
#439540713VYADSFVIRGDEV
#54104189IAPGQTGKI
#64444529KVGGNYNYL
#74724809IYQAGSTPC
#848150525NGVEGFNCYFPLQSYGFQPTNGVGY
#949752125FQPTNGVGYQPYRVVVLSFELLHAP
#1051353826LSFELLHAPATVCGPKKSTNLVKNKC
#10–15265338GPKKSTNL
#10–25255339CGPKKSTNL
#10–352453310VCGPKKSTNL
#10–452353311TVCGPKKSTNL
#10–552253312ATVCGPKKSTNL
List of tested peptide.

Immunization

The BALB/c mice were injected subcutaneously with 20 μg of the S-RBD protein and 40 μg of CpG ODN 1668 in 100 μl PBS in the right flank at weekly intervals.

Flow cytometry and intracellular cytokine staining

For intracellular cytokine staining, splenocytes were first incubated with the synthetic peptides or the coene">ntrol 9 m peptide for 30 miene">n at 37 °C aene">nd theene">n iene">ncubated for aene">n additioene">nal 16 h with GolgiPlug (BD Bioscieene">nces, Fraene">nkliene">n Lakes, n class="Gene">NJ, USA). These cells were then stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD8 mAb. After permeabilization and fixation using a Cytofix/Cytoperm kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Bioscience), the cells were stained intracellularly with APC-conjugated anti-IFN-γ mAb. After washing, the cells were analyzed on the FACSCanto II system and the results analyzed with FlowJo software (TOMY Digital Biology, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences between groups were examined for statistical significance using the Student t-test. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results and discussion

In this study, we attempted to identify minimal epitope(s) in the S-RBD of SARS-CoV-2 that would be recogene">nized by n class="Gene">CD8+ T cells in mice immunized with the protein. A recombinant S-RBD protein (aa 319–541) produced in mammalian cells was subcutaneously injected together with CpG ODN 1668 into naive BALB/c mice, twice weekly. At 1 week after the last immunization, the mice were sacrificed and their spleens were removed. Specific CD8+ T-cell induction in the splenocytes was then analyzed by intracellular staining for IFN-γ after stimulation of the cells with short and long peptides in vitro. These peptides included potential S-RBD-derived epitopes that were predicted by the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) analysis resource (http://www.iedb.org/) to bind to murine major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I (Table 2 ). We prepared 10 peptides (peptide #1 to #10) that covered all predicted epitopes with a score of greater than 0.15 and a percentile rank of < 0.5 (Table 1 and Fig. 1 A). As shown in Fig. 1B, the CD8+ T cells in splenocytes from the immunized mice produced a significant amount of IFN-γ when stimulated with peptide #10 (sequence: LSFELLHAPATVCGPKKSTNLVKNKC), suggesting the presence of minimal epitopes in the C-terminus region of S-RBD.
Table 2

Predicted epitopes for spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 (aa319-541).

AllelestartendlengthSequencescorerank
H2-Kd3503589VYAWNRKRI0.7458830.04
H2-Kd5045129GYQPYRVVV0.7409920.04
H2-Dd5255339CGPKKSTNL0.5373620.02
H2-Dd3823909VSPTKLNDL0.4996420.02
H2-Kd3793879CYGVSPTKL0.4989690.14
H2-Kd49450310SYGFQPTNGV0.4574920.17
H2-Dd52453310VCGPKKSTNL0.4326740.03
H2-Kd3273359VRFPNITNL0.38070.22
H2-Kd3954028VYADSFVI0.3722750.22
H2-Dd5055139YQPYRVVVL0.352730.06
H2-Kd50451310GYQPYRVVVL0.3390940.26
H2-Kd3283358RFPNITNL0.3194520.28
H2-Kd3994079SFVIRGDEV0.3191660.28
H2-Dd5035119VGYQPYRVV0.3133910.1
H2-Dd50351311VGYQPYRVVVL0.3030710.11
H2-Kd37838710KCYGVSPTKL0.2650130.36
H2-Dd3693779YNSASFSTF0.2459410.17
H2-Dd4104189IAPGQTGKI0.2421320.18
H2-Dd4454528VGGNYNYL0.2330270.19
H2-Dd52353311TVCGPKKSTNL0.2139290.24
H2-Kd4724809IYQAGSTPC0.2046690.48
H2-Dd3273359VRFPNITNL0.200420.28
H2-Dd52253312ATVCGPKKSTNL0.1888220.32
H2-Dd3283358RFPNITNL0.1563470.45
H2-Dd52053314APATVCGPKKSTNL0.1554950.46
H2-Dd4444529KVGGNYNYL0.1536460.47
H2-Dd3703778NSASFSTF0.1522660.48
H2-Dd5035108VGYQPYRV0.1514770.49
Fig. 1

S-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells recognize the C-terminus region of the S-RBD protein. (A) Mapping of the predicted epitopes and synthesized peptides. The red and blue lines show the predicted epitopes (H2-Kd and H2-Dd, respectively) and the green lines show the synthesized peptides. (B) BALB/c mice were immunized with the S1 protein twice weekly. Splenocytes were obtained and specific T-cell induction was analyzed with intracellular cytokine staining assays, using stimulation with the indicated peptides. These experiments were repeated two times with similar results. Data are the mean ± SD. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Predicted epitopes for spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 (aa319-541). S-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells recognize the C-termiene">nus regioene">n of the S-RBD proteiene">n. (A) Mappiene">ng of the predicted epitopes aene">nd synthesized n class="Chemical">peptides. The red and blue lines show the predicted epitopes (H2-Kd and H2-Dd, respectively) and the green lines show the synthesized peptides. (B) BALB/c mice were immunized with the S1 protein twice weekly. Splenocytes were obtained and specific T-cell induction was analyzed with intracellular cytokine staining assays, using stimulation with the indicated peptides. These experiments were repeated two times with similar results. Data are the mean ± SD. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) In a study by Zhi et al. [15], the SARS-CoV S peptide CYGVSATKL (aa 366–374) was recogene">nized by CTLs iene">n n class="Species">mice vaccinated with an adenoviral vector encoding the wild-type S protein of the virus. By contrast, a peptide of the homologous region on the SARS-CoV-2 S protein (CYGVSPTKL; aa 379–387) was not recognized by CTLs in our study. The replacement of residue A371 by K or D in this epitope of SARS-CoV led to decreased recognition of the peptide by CTLs, suggesting that residue A371 is critical for epitope recognition by CTLs [16]. To determine the minimal epitope(s) required, we synthesized five truncated peptides of peptide #10 (shown in Table 1) and used them to stimulate CTLs from the immunized mice in vitro. Although peptide #10–1 had an IEDB score of 0.0994 and a percentile rank of 0.97, all the short peptides tested were recognized at a similar degree by CTLs (Fig. 2 A). We next tested lower concentrations of the short peptides, whereupon peptides #10–1 (S526–533, 8-mer) and #10–2 (S525–533, 9-mer) were found to be well recognized by CTLs in concentrations as low as 0.03 nM (Fig. 2B). Because peptide #10–1 was shorter, it was considered the minimal epitope for CTLs. We then assessed the MHC restriction of this recognition using MHC blocking antibodies. The specific CD8+ T-cell response to peptide #10–1 was suppressed by the addition of the anti-H2-Kd/Dd mAb, but not the anti-H2-Kd mAb (Fig. 2C), indicating that this peptide was a H2-Dd-restricted epitope. Taken together, the results indicated that we had succeeded in identifying a H2-Dd-restricted S526–533 peptide as an epitope for SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells in mice.
Fig. 2

Peptide S1526–533 is identified as the H2-Dd-restricted CD8+ CTL epitope. (A, B) BALB/c mice were immunized with the S1 protein twice weekly. Splenocytes were obtained and specific T-cell induction was analyzed with intracellular cytokine staining assays, using stimulation with the indicated peptides. (B) The avidity of the induced S-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells was analyzed with intracellular cytokine staining assays, using stimulation by graded doses of the peptides (ranging from 1 to 0.003 µM). (C) BALB/c mice were immunized with the S1 protein twice weekly. Splenocytes were obtained and specific T-cell induction was stimulated with S1526–533 peptides. MHC restriction of the induced S-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells was analyzed with the intracellular cytokine staining assay after the addition of anti-H2-Kd/Dd or anti-H2-Kd mAbs. These experiments were repeated two times with similar results. Data are the mean ± SD.

Peptide S1526–533 is identified as the H2-Dd-restricted n class="Gene">CD8+ CTL epitope. (A, B) BALB/c mice were immunized with the S1 protein twice weekly. Splenocytes were obtained and specific T-cell induction was analyzed with intracellular cytokine staining assays, using stimulation with the indicated peptides. (B) The avidity of the induced S-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells was analyzed with intracellular cytokine staining assays, using stimulation by graded doses of the peptides (ranging from 1 to 0.003 µM). (C) BALB/c mice were immunized with the S1 protein twice weekly. Splenocytes were obtained and specific T-cell induction was stimulated with S1526–533 peptides. MHC restriction of the induced S-RBD-specific CD8+ T cells was analyzed with the intracellular cytokine staining assay after the addition of anti-H2-Kd/Dd or anti-H2-Kd mAbs. These experiments were repeated two times with similar results. Data are the mean ± SD. In conclusion, we have established a BALB/c mouse model for the evaluatioene">n of CTL respoene">nses to the S-RBD of n class="Species">SARS-CoV-2. This model could be used to confirm the immunogenicity of candidate vaccines in terms of CTL induction, which has become more recognized as an important mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 eradication. Although a mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection has already been established [6], [17], it does not reveal whether the virus-specific CTLs influence the pathology of COVID-19 or contribute to the elimination of the virus, as none of the currently available methods can monitor virus-specific CD8+ T cells. Our mouse model would be useful for addressing these issues by enabling analysis of the distribution, function, and phenotype of specific CD8+ T cells in SARS-CoV-2-infected mice. This would be facilitated by the generation of a peptide:MHC tetramer using the epitope peptide identified in this study. In future, the strategy of epitope identification used in this study would also be useful for the determination of human CTL epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 when used in combination with HLA transgenic mice [18]. Together, these strategies could help toward a more efficient and precise development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Author contributions

DM aene">nd n class="Gene">NH designed the experiments; DM and DS performed the experiments; DM analyzed the data; NH, SS, KA and HI contributed reagents, materials, and analytical tools; DM and NH wrote the original draft of the paper; all authors approved the final draft for journal submission.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [NH is CEO aene">nd CTO of Uene">nited Immuene">nity, Co., Ltd. The other authors have no coene">nflicts of iene">nterest related to this study to declare.].
  17 in total

1.  The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice.

Authors:  Linlin Bao; Wei Deng; Baoying Huang; Hong Gao; Jiangning Liu; Lili Ren; Qiang Wei; Pin Yu; Yanfeng Xu; Feifei Qi; Yajin Qu; Fengdi Li; Qi Lv; Wenling Wang; Jing Xue; Shuran Gong; Mingya Liu; Guanpeng Wang; Shunyi Wang; Zhiqi Song; Linna Zhao; Peipei Liu; Li Zhao; Fei Ye; Huijuan Wang; Weimin Zhou; Na Zhu; Wei Zhen; Haisheng Yu; Xiaojuan Zhang; Li Guo; Lan Chen; Conghui Wang; Ying Wang; Xinming Wang; Yan Xiao; Qiangming Sun; Hongqi Liu; Fanli Zhu; Chunxia Ma; Lingmei Yan; Mengli Yang; Jun Han; Wenbo Xu; Wenjie Tan; Xiaozhong Peng; Qi Jin; Guizhen Wu; Chuan Qin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Prospects for a MERS-CoV spike vaccine.

Authors:  Yusen Zhou; Shibo Jiang; Lanying Du
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 5.217

3.  Determination of cellularly processed HLA-A2402-restricted novel CTL epitopes derived from two cancer germ line genes, MAGE-A4 and SAGE.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Miyahara; Hiroaki Naota; Lijie Wang; Atsunori Hiasa; Megumi Goto; Masato Watanabe; Shigehisa Kitano; Satoshi Okumura; Tetsushi Takemitsu; Atsushi Yuta; Yuichi Majima; François A Lemonnier; Thierry Boon; Hiroshi Shiku
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Potent neutralization of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus by a human mAb to S1 protein that blocks receptor association.

Authors:  Jianhua Sui; Wenhui Li; Akikazu Murakami; Azaibi Tamin; Leslie J Matthews; Swee Kee Wong; Michael J Moore; Aimee St Clair Tallarico; Mobolaji Olurinde; Hyeryun Choe; Larry J Anderson; William J Bellini; Michael Farzan; Wayne A Marasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Abishek Chandrashekar; Jinyan Liu; Amanda J Martinot; Katherine McMahan; Noe B Mercado; Lauren Peter; Lisa H Tostanoski; Jingyou Yu; Zoltan Maliga; Michael Nekorchuk; Kathleen Busman-Sahay; Margaret Terry; Linda M Wrijil; Sarah Ducat; David R Martinez; Caroline Atyeo; Stephanie Fischinger; John S Burke; Matthew D Slein; Laurent Pessaint; Alex Van Ry; Jack Greenhouse; Tammy Taylor; Kelvin Blade; Anthony Cook; Brad Finneyfrock; Renita Brown; Elyse Teow; Jason Velasco; Roland Zahn; Frank Wegmann; Peter Abbink; Esther A Bondzie; Gabriel Dagotto; Makda S Gebre; Xuan He; Catherine Jacob-Dolan; Nicole Kordana; Zhenfeng Li; Michelle A Lifton; Shant H Mahrokhian; Lori F Maxfield; Ramya Nityanandam; Joseph P Nkolola; Aaron G Schmidt; Andrew D Miller; Ralph S Baric; Galit Alter; Peter K Sorger; Jacob D Estes; Hanne Andersen; Mark G Lewis; Dan H Barouch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  T cell responses to whole SARS coronavirus in humans.

Authors:  Chris Ka-fai Li; Hao Wu; Huiping Yan; Shiwu Ma; Lili Wang; Mingxia Zhang; Xiaoping Tang; Nigel J Temperton; Robin A Weiss; Jason M Brenchley; Daniel C Douek; Juthathip Mongkolsapaya; Bac-Hai Tran; Chen-lung Steve Lin; Gavin R Screaton; Jin-lin Hou; Andrew J McMichael; Xiao-Ning Xu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Residue analysis of a CTL epitope of SARS-CoV spike protein by IFN-gamma production and bioinformatics prediction.

Authors:  Jun Huang; Yingnan Cao; Xianzhang Bu; Changyou Wu
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.615

8.  Memory T cell responses targeting the SARS coronavirus persist up to 11 years post-infection.

Authors:  Oi-Wing Ng; Adeline Chia; Anthony T Tan; Ramesh S Jadi; Hoe Nam Leong; Antonio Bertoletti; Yee-Joo Tan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in severe versus mild individuals.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Rui Gan; Ziqi Zhen; Xiaoli Hu; Xiang Li; Fengxia Zhou; Ying Liu; Chuangeng Chen; Shuangyu Xie; Bailing Zhang; Xiaoke Wu; Zhiwei Huang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-08-14
View more
  4 in total

1.  A booster dose of Delta × Omicron hybrid mRNA vaccine produced broadly neutralizing antibody against Omicron and other SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Authors:  Cheng-Pu Sun; Ping-Yi Wu; I-Jung Lee; Yu-Hua Lan; I-Hsuan Wang; Wen-Chun Liu; Joyce Pei-Yi Yuan; Yu-Wei Chang; Sheng-Che Tseng; Szu-I Tsung; Yu-Chi Chou; Monika Kumari; Yin-Shiou Lin; Hui-Feng Chen; Tsung-Yen Chen; Chih-Chao Lin; Chi-Wen Chiu; Chung-Hsuan Hsieh; Cheng-Ying Chuang; Chao-Min Cheng; Hsiu-Ting Lin; Wan-Yu Chen; Fu-Fei Hsu; Ming-Hsiang Hong; Chun-Che Liao; Chih-Shin Chang; Jian-Jong Liang; Hsiu-Hua Ma; Ming-Tsai Chiang; Hsin-Ni Liao; Hui-Ying Ko; Liang-Yu Chen; Yi-An Ko; Pei-Yu Yu; Tzu-Jing Yang; Po-Cheng Chiang; Shang-Te Hsu; Yi-Ling Lin; Chong-Chou Lee; Han-Chung Wu; Mi-Hua Tao
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 12.771

2.  Identification of a promiscuous conserved CTL epitope within the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Authors:  Sheng Jiang; Shuting Wu; Gan Zhao; Yue He; Xinrong Guo; Zhiyu Zhang; Jiawang Hou; Yuan Ding; Alex Cheng; Bin Wang
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 7.163

3.  Towards the development of an epitope-focused vaccine for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Jacquelynne Cervantes-Torres; Sergio Rosales-Mendoza; Carlos Cabello; Laura Montero; Juan Hernandez-Aceves; Guillermo Granados; Arturo Calderón-Gallegos; Francisco Zúñiga-Flores; Mirna Ruiz-Rivera; Julio César Abarca-Magaña; Sandra Ortega-Francisco; Roxana Olguin-Alor; Georgina Díaz; Filipo Paczka-Garcia; Rubí Zavala-Gaytan; Ricardo Vázquez-Ramírez; Dolores Adriana Ayón-Nuñez; Julio César Carrero; Diana Rios; Mariana Jasso-Ramírez; Rebeca Vázquez-Hernández; David Venegas; Daniel Garzón; Laura Cobos; René Segura-Velázquez; Nelly Villalobos; Gabriela Meneses; Joaquín Zúñiga; Gerardo Gamba; Graciela Cárdenas; Marisela Hernández; Michael E Parkhouse; Marta C Romano; Luis Alonso Herrera; Raúl J Bobes; Mayra Pérez-Tapia; Leonor Huerta; Nora Fierro; Isabel Gracia; Gloria Soldevilla; Gladis Fragoso; Francisco Suárez-Güemes; Juan P Laclette; Edda Sciutto
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.169

4.  A Murine CD8+ T Cell Epitope Identified in the Receptor-Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein.

Authors:  Jihyun Yang; Eunjin Kim; Jong-Soo Lee; Haryoung Poo
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.