Literature DB >> 33164130

Car expertise does not compete with face expertise during ensemble coding.

Jisoo Sun1, Isabel Gauthier2.   

Abstract

When objects from two categories of expertise (e.g., faces and cars in dual car/face experts) are processed simultaneously, competition occurs across a variety of tasks. Here, we investigate whether competition between face and car processing also occurs during ensemble coding. The relationship between single object recognition and ensemble coding is debated, but if ensemble coding relies on the same ability as object recognition, we expect cars to interfere with ensemble coding of faces as a function of car expertise. We measured the ability to judge the variability in identity of arrays of faces, in the presence of task-irrelevant distractors (cars or novel objects). On each trial, participants viewed two sequential arrays containing four faces and four distractors, judging which array was the more diverse in terms of face identity. We measured participants' car expertise, object recognition ability, and face recognition ability. Using Bayesian statistics, we found evidence against competition as a function of car expertise during ensemble coding of faces. Face recognition ability predicted ensemble judgments for faces, regardless of the category of task-irrelevant distractors. The result suggests that ensemble coding is not susceptible to competition between different domains of similar expertise, unlike single-object recognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competition; Individual differences; Object perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33164130     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02188-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  24 in total

1.  Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  D Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

2.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The Cambridge Car Memory Test: a task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects.

Authors:  Hugh W Dennett; Elinor McKone; Raka Tavashmi; Ashleigh Hall; Madeleine Pidcock; Mark Edwards; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-06

4.  Object ensemble processing in human anterior-medial ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; Yaoda Xu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04

6.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 8.  What is the Bandwidth of Perceptual Experience?

Authors:  Michael A Cohen; Daniel C Dennett; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Tim Curran; Kim M Curby; Daniel Collins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Perceived Average Orientation Reflects Effective Gist of the Surface.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.