Literature DB >> 33163916

Femoral nerve palsy following kidney transplantation: A case report and review of the literature.

Shuhei Yamada1, Kiyohiko Hotta1, Masahiko Takahata2, Daiki Iwami1, Yuki Sugito1, Tatsu Tanabe1, Naoya Iwahara1, Nobuo Shinohara1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Femoral nerve palsy is a rare but serious complication of kidney transplantation. We report a case of femoral nerve palsy following kidney transplantation and conduct a review of the literature on this complication. CASE
PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old woman with end-stage kidney disease, underwent kidney transplantation in the right iliac fossa. The day after the transplantation, she could not straighten her right leg. Physical examination revealed a paresis of her right quadriceps muscle. The patient's sensation of her right thigh was also impaired. We diagnosed her with femoral nerve palsy caused by inappropriate compression from a self-retaining retractor. Rehabilitation was started immediately. The patient's motor weakness gradually improved, and the patient became able to walk independently 4 weeks later. However, the patient's neuropathic pain sustained 6 months after her kidney transplantation.
CONCLUSION: The improper use of self-retaining retractors can lead to femoral nerve palsy in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.
© 2020 The Authors. IJU Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; femoral nerve palsy; kidney; self‐retaining retractor; transplantation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33163916      PMCID: PMC7609172          DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IJU Case Rep        ISSN: 2577-171X


femoral nerve femoral nerve palsy kidney transplantation We described a case of FNP after KT and reviewed the previous reports of FNP in kidney recipients. Improper use of self‐retaining retractors can lead to FNP in KT. Although the prognosis of motor function is favorable, neuropathic pain may persist. Therefore, careful attention to the direction and the depth of self‐retaining retractors is necessary during KT, and the use of retractors with a shallower blade is advised.

Introduction

FNP after KT is a rare but serious complication that can compromise postoperative recovery and prolong the hospital stay. , FNP can cause gait disturbances due to motor dysfunction of the quadriceps muscle, resulting in deterioration of a patient’s quality of life. In this report, we describe the clinical course of a case of FNP after KT. Furthermore, we review previous reports of FNP in kidney recipients to determine the pathogenesis, prognosis, and proper surgical techniques for preventing FNP.

Case presentation

A 35‐year‐old woman with end‐stage kidney disease due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis underwent an ABO compatible preemptive KT in the right iliac fossa. Her body mass index was 18.7 kg/m2. She had low titer donor specific antibodies. The induction immunosuppression regimen included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone, basiliximab, and rituximab. The total operating time was 5 h and 7 min, including a 1 h 31 min wait for the donor kidney. The surgical techniques are described in next part. The graft function after surgery was excellent. However, on postoperative day 1, the patient was not able to straighten her right leg. Physical examination revealed a paresis of her right quadriceps muscle. The patient’s sensation of her right thigh was also impaired. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed no significant findings that could lead to FNP including hematoma or spinal disk herniation. We diagnosed her with FNP caused by inappropriate compression from a self‐retaining retractor during surgery. Rehabilitation was started immediately. The patient’s motor weakness gradually improved, and the patient became able to walk independently 4 weeks later. The patient began to complain of neuropathic pain as her sensory disturbance recovered. Despite the administration of pregabalin (200 mg/day), her neuropathic pain sustained 6 months after her KT.

Surgical techniques

A lower quadrant curvilinear incision was made. A self‐retaining retractor with three blades in the mid‐medial, upper‐medial, and mid‐lateral directions was used. In this case, the mid‐lateral blade to the retractor was directed more caudally than usual (Fig. 1a,b). Arterial dissection was performed from the proximal common iliac artery to the distal external iliac artery. The internal iliac vein was ligated to mobilize the external iliac vein. The renal artery was anastomosed to the common iliac artery, and the renal vein to the external iliac vein.
Fig. 1

(a) Usual case: self‐retaining retractor deployment. We used three blades, in the mid‐medial (①), upper‐medial (②), and mid‐lateral directions (③). A folded surgical gauze is inserted between blades and the body to prevent tissue injury. P, psoas muscle; E, external iliac artery. (b) Current case. The mid‐lateral blade (③) to the retractor was directed more caudally than usual.

(a) Usual case: self‐retaining retractor deployment. We used three blades, in the mid‐medial (①), upper‐medial (②), and mid‐lateral directions (③). A folded surgical gauze is inserted between blades and the body to prevent tissue injury. P, psoas muscle; E, external iliac artery. (b) Current case. The mid‐lateral blade (③) to the retractor was directed more caudally than usual.

Discussion

The FN is the largest branch of the lumbar plexus (L2 to L4), and is derived from the posterior divisions of the anterior primary rami of the second, third, and fourth lumbar spinal nerves. Formed within the psoas muscle, it comes out from the lateral border of this muscle 4 cm above the inguinal ligament, lying beneath the fascia on the iliacus. The FN descends in a shallow groove between the iliac and psoas major muscle (Fig. 2a). Therefore, the FN is vulnerable to damage by retractor injury due to its anatomical position. The lateral blades of the self‐retained retractor can easily compress the FN when use incorrectly. Furthermore, due to the low blood supply to the nerve in this area, any compression can easily lead to ischemic damage to the nerve. Previous studies have reported three mechanisms to explain the cause of FNP following KT: physical compression, traction or impinging damage, and ischemic injury of the FN. , ,
Fig. 2

(a) Schema of the course of femoral nerve: femoral nerve comes out from the lateral border of psoas muscle 4 cm above the inguinal ligament. The femoral nerve descends in a shallow groove between the iliac and psoas major muscle. (b) Schema of the operative field in the current case: in the lower part of the psoas muscle, the femoral nerve is closer to the surface and can be compressed easily.

(a) Schema of the course of femoral nerve: femoral nerve comes out from the lateral border of psoas muscle 4 cm above the inguinal ligament. The femoral nerve descends in a shallow groove between the iliac and psoas major muscle. (b) Schema of the operative field in the current case: in the lower part of the psoas muscle, the femoral nerve is closer to the surface and can be compressed easily. There are few published reports of FNP after KT. Our case and other reports of FNP after KT are summarized in Table 1. In retrospective studies, the reported incidence of FNP after KT varies from 0.14% to 8.4%. , , , , , , Likewise, in a prospective study, FNP after KT occurred in 4 of 184 recipients (2.2%). According to a prospective study by Nikoobakht et al., the risk of FNP is higher in female patients and in those with a history of diabetes, although factors such as age, dialysis time, body type, anastomotic time, retractor time, and operation time had no effect on the appearance of FNP. A prospective study of FNP after hysterectomies suggested that the incidence of FNP is associated with the use of self‐retaining retractors.
Table 1

Reported cases of post‐transplant femoral neuropathy

Case no.AuthorGenderAgeSideLesionRecovery
1Vaziri et al. 6 Female30RightM, S8 weeks
2Female22RightM, S7 months
3Male51LeftM, S1.5 weeks
4Yazbeck et al. 7 Male18RightM1 month
5Male16RightM, SM 1 week; S 2 months
6Vogels et al. 8 Male5LeftM, S5 months
7Male16LeftM, S1 month, largely recovered
8Female12RightM, S8 months
9Sisto et al. 9 Male48N/AM, S12 months
10Male29N/AM, SM 2 months, S 6 months
11Female42N/AM, SM 5 months, S 12 months
12Male63N/AM, S44 months partial
13Male57N/AM, S30 months partial
14Male40N/AM3 months
15Male26N/AM, S3 months
16Sharma et al. 11 Female58RightM, S3 months
17Female63RightM, S6 months
18Female32RightM9 months
19Male41RightM, S6 months
20Jog et al. 10 Male40RightM, S4 months
21Male39LeftM, S6 months
22Female32LeftM, S6 months
23Male40LeftM, S6 months, impaired motor function
24Female18LeftM, S6 months
25Van et al. 3 Male48LeftM, S3 months
26Male69RightM, S1 year
27Male66LeftMDied 2 months after transplantation
28Male59RightM, S1 year, hypoesthesia
29Male59RightM3 months, partial
30Kim et al. 1 Female42RightM2 months
31Female61RightM10 months
32Female49RightM3 months
33Male54RightM12 days
34Female26RightM3 days
35Current studyFemale35RightM, SM 1 month, S 6 months
Overall

Male 21

Female 14

Median 40

(5–69)

Right 19

Left 9

M, S 25

M 10

M median 4 months (3 days to 44 months)

S median 6 months (1–44 months)

M, motor function; N/A, not available; S, sensory function.

Reported cases of post‐transplant femoral neuropathy Male 21 Female 14 Median 40 (5–69) Right 19 Left 9 M, S 25 M 10 M median 4 months (3 days to 44 months) S median 6 months (1–44 months) M, motor function; N/A, not available; S, sensory function. Motor function has good prognosis in most cases of FNP. Table 1 shows that recovery of motor function ranged from 3 days to 44 months (median 4 months). The patient in this study had good motor recovery. However, impaired sensation can persist and result in postsurgical pain. Recovery of sensory function ranged from 1 month to 44 months (median 6 months). Our patient continues to suffer from neuropathic pain 6 months after her KT. One systematic review reports that postoperative neuropathic pain can persist long term, which is distressing for patients and reduces their quality of life. In this case, the mid‐lateral blade to the retractor was directed more caudally than usual. In the lower part of the psoas muscle, the femoral nerve is closer to the surface and can be compressed easily (Figs 1b and 2b). Furthermore, the self‐retaining retractors are typically released while waiting for the donor kidney, but we forgot to do so in this case, leading to unnecessary compression on the femoral nerve for 90 min. Despite the results of a prospective study that showed no effect on appearance of FNP, it may cause ischemia and risk of FNP. In order to avoid FNP, a shallow blade should be used to provide traction of the lower lateral surgical field during KT.

Conclusion

Improper use of self‐retaining retractors can lead to FNP in KT. Although the prognosis of motor function is favorable, neuropathic pain may persist. Therefore, careful attention to the direction and the depth of self‐retaining retractors is necessary during KT, and the use of retractors with a shallower blade is advised.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Troels S Jensen; Clifford J Woolf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Femoral neuropathy after renal transplantation.

Authors:  D Sisto; W S Chiu; G W Geelhoed; R Lewis
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  Femoral neuropathy: a complication of renal transplantation.

Authors:  N D Vaziri; C H Barton; G R Ravikumar; D C Martin; R Ness; J Saiki
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  Characteristics of Femoral Motor Neuropathies Induced After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Series.

Authors:  M-H Kim; K-W Jun; J-K Hwang; I-S Moon; J-I Kim
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Femoral neuropathy subsequent to abdominal hysterectomy. A comparative study.

Authors:  J A Goldman; D Feldberg; D Dicker; N Samuel; A Dekel
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 6.  Iatrogenic femoral nerve injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abigail E Moore; Mark D Stringer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Incidence of acute femoral neuropathy following renal transplantation.

Authors:  Khema Ram Sharma; Jonathan Cross; Fernando Santiago; D Ram Ayyar; George Burke
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2002-04

8.  Femoral neuropathy in renal transplantation.

Authors:  M S Jog; J E Turley; H Berry
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Pelvic nerve neuropathy after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  M Nikoobakht; A Mahboobi; A Saraji; A Mehrsai; A Emamzadeh; M T Mahmoudi; G Pourmand
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  Iatrogenic femoral neuropathy following pelvic surgery: a rare and often overlooked complication--four case reports and literature review.

Authors:  Wen-Shih Huang; Paul Y Lin; Chong-Hong Yeh; Chih-Chien Chin; Ching-Chuan Hsieh; Jeng-Yi Wang
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Iatrogenic femoral nerve injuries: Analysis of medico-legal issues through a scoping review approach.

Authors:  Filippo Gibelli; Giovanna Ricci; Ascanio Sirignano; Paolo Bailo; Domenico De Leo
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.