Brandon J Diessner1, Nathan Pankratz2, Anthony J Hooten1, Lisa Mirabello3, Aaron L Sarver4, Lauren J Mills1, David Malkin5,6, Ava C Kelley2, Logan G Spector1. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 3. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 4. Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 5. Division of Hematology/Oncology and Genetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Departments of Pediatrics and Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To ascertain the prevalence of recurrent de novo variants among 240 pediatric patients with osteosarcoma (OS; age < 20 years) unselected for family history of cancer. METHODS: The identification of de novo variants was implemented in 2 phases. In the first, we identified genes with a rare (minor allele frequency < 0.01) de novo variant in > 1 of the 95 case-parent trios examined by whole-exome sequencing (WES) who passed quality control measures. In phase 2, 145 additional patients with OS were evaluated by targeted sequencing to identify rare de novo variants in genes nominated from phase 1. Recurrent rare variants identified from phase 1 and 2 were verified as either de novo or inherited by Sanger sequencing of affected patients and their parents. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using Fisher exact test and t tests, respectively. RESULTS: Among 95 case-parent trios who underwent WES, we observed 61 de novo variants in 60 genes among 47 patients, with TP53 identified as the only gene with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) de novo variant in more than one case-parent trio. Among all 240 patients with OS, 13 (5.4%) harbored a P/LP TP53 germline variant, of which 6 (46.2%) were confirmed to be de novo. CONCLUSION: Apart from TP53, we did not observe any other recurrent de novo P/LP variants in the case-parent trios, suggesting that new mutations in other genes are not a frequent cause of pediatric OS. That nearly half of P/LP TP53 variants in our sample were de novo suggests universal screening for germline TP53 P/LP variants among pediatric patients with OS should be considered.
PURPOSE: To ascertain the prevalence of recurrent de novo variants among 240 pediatric patients with osteosarcoma (OS; age < 20 years) unselected for family history of cancer. METHODS: The identification of de novo variants was implemented in 2 phases. In the first, we identified genes with a rare (minor allele frequency < 0.01) de novo variant in > 1 of the 95 case-parent trios examined by whole-exome sequencing (WES) who passed quality control measures. In phase 2, 145 additional patients with OS were evaluated by targeted sequencing to identify rare de novo variants in genes nominated from phase 1. Recurrent rare variants identified from phase 1 and 2 were verified as either de novo or inherited by Sanger sequencing of affected patients and their parents. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using Fisher exact test and t tests, respectively. RESULTS: Among 95 case-parent trios who underwent WES, we observed 61 de novo variants in 60 genes among 47 patients, with TP53 identified as the only gene with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) de novo variant in more than one case-parent trio. Among all 240 patients with OS, 13 (5.4%) harbored a P/LP TP53 germline variant, of which 6 (46.2%) were confirmed to be de novo. CONCLUSION: Apart from TP53, we did not observe any other recurrent de novo P/LP variants in the case-parent trios, suggesting that new mutations in other genes are not a frequent cause of pediatric OS. That nearly half of P/LP TP53 variants in our sample were de novo suggests universal screening for germline TP53 P/LP variants among pediatric patients with OS should be considered.
Authors: Phuong L Mai; Ana F Best; June A Peters; Rosamma M DeCastro; Payal P Khincha; Jennifer T Loud; Renée C Bremer; Philip S Rosenberg; Sharon A Savage Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-08-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lisa Mirabello; Meredith Yeager; Phuong L Mai; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Richard Gorlick; Chand Khanna; Ana Patiño-Garcia; Luis Sierrasesúmaga; Fernando Lecanda; Irene L Andrulis; Jay S Wunder; Nalan Gokgoz; Donald A Barkauskas; Xijun Zhang; Aurelie Vogt; Kristine Jones; Joseph F Boland; Stephen J Chanock; Sharon A Savage Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ivan A Adzhubei; Steffen Schmidt; Leonid Peshkin; Vasily E Ramensky; Anna Gerasimova; Peer Bork; Alexey S Kondrashov; Shamil R Sunyaev Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Anita Villani; Ari Shore; Jonathan D Wasserman; Derek Stephens; Raymond H Kim; Harriet Druker; Bailey Gallinger; Anne Naumer; Wendy Kohlmann; Ana Novokmet; Uri Tabori; Marta Tijerin; Mary-Louise C Greer; Jonathan L Finlay; Joshua D Schiffman; David Malkin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jinghui Zhang; Michael F Walsh; Gang Wu; Kim E Nichols; Michael N Edmonson; Tanja A Gruber; John Easton; Dale Hedges; Xiaotu Ma; Xin Zhou; Donald A Yergeau; Mark R Wilkinson; Bhavin Vadodaria; Xiang Chen; Rose B McGee; Stacy Hines-Dowell; Regina Nuccio; Emily Quinn; Sheila A Shurtleff; Michael Rusch; Aman Patel; Jared B Becksfort; Shuoguo Wang; Meaghann S Weaver; Li Ding; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; Amar Gajjar; David W Ellison; Alberto S Pappo; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Chompret; L Brugières; M Ronsin; M Gardes; F Dessarps-Freichey; A Abel; D Hua; L Ligot; M G Dondon; B Bressac-de Paillerets; T Frébourg; J Lemerle; C Bonaïti-Pellié; J Feunteun Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Eric J Chow; Lena E Winestone; Philip J Lupo; Lisa R Diller; Tara O Henderson; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Jennifer M Levine; Kirsten K Ness; Smita Bhatia; Saro H Armenian Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Austin L Brown; Pagna Sok; Michael E Scheurer; Karen R Rabin; Erin L Marcotte; Douglas S Hawkins; Logan G Spector; Philip J Lupo Journal: Cancer Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 6.921