Literature DB >> 33163550

A History of #BCSM and Insights for Patient-Centered Online Interaction and Engagement.

Matthew S Katz1, Alicia C Staley2, Deanna J Attai3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Participation in cancer support groups can provide a sense of community and may better prepare patients for interactions with their health care team. Online interactions may overcome some barriers to in-person support group participation. #BCSM (breast cancer social media), the first cancer support community established on Twitter, was founded in 2011 by two breast cancer survivors. The aims of this study are to describe the growth and changes in this community and to discuss future directions and lessons that may apply to other online support communities.
METHODS: Symplur Signals was used to obtain all #BCSM Twitter data from January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2020 (00:00:00 Coordinated Universal Time for both). Hashtag use by selected stakeholder groups, user locations, weekly tweet chat activity, and topics were determined.
RESULTS: From year 1 (2011) to year 9 (2019), tweets using the #BCSM hashtag increased by 424%. Tweets by patient advocates increased by 226%, with a peak in 2016. Impressions, a measure of potential tweet views, by patient advocates increased by 517%. Tweets by doctors and nonphysician health care professionals increased by 693%. Weekly #BCSM tweet chat activity peaked in 2013, increasing by 58.1% from 2011. Chat topics have included survivorship, metastatic breast cancer, death and dying, advocacy, and highlights from national breast cancer meetings.
CONCLUSIONS: #BCSM has experienced tremendous growth since 2011, although there are challenges to community sustainability. The weekly chats, as well as discussions utilizing the hashtag but occurring outside of scheduled chat times, serve as an important resource for patients and offer physicians an opportunity to both support and learn from patients.
© 2020 Aurora Health Care, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #BCSM; Twitter; breast cancer; patient advocacy; social media; support group

Year:  2020        PMID: 33163550      PMCID: PMC7644133          DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev        ISSN: 2330-068X


  16 in total

1.  Digital literacy linked to engagement and psychological benefits among breast cancer survivors in Internet-based peer support groups.

Authors:  Stephen J Lepore; Maria A Rincon; Joanne S Buzaglo; Mitch Golant; Morton A Lieberman; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Suzanne Chambers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 2.  Social media for breast cancer survivors: a literature review.

Authors:  Angela L Falisi; Kara P Wiseman; Anna Gaysynsky; Jennifer K Scheideler; Daniel A Ramin; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  #BCSM and #breastcancer: Contemporary cancer-specific online social media communities.

Authors:  James R Platt; Richard R Brady
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study.

Authors:  Johannes Huber; Tanja Muck; Philipp Maatz; Bastian Keck; Paul Enders; Imad Maatouk; Andreas Ihrig
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Use of Online Communication by Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer During the Treatment Decision Process.

Authors:  Lauren P Wallner; Kathryn A Martinez; Yun Li; Reshma Jagsi; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Online social support among breast cancer patients: longitudinal changes to Facebook use following breast cancer diagnosis and transition off therapy.

Authors:  Jude P Mikal; Michael J Beckstrand; Elise Parks; Mosunmoluwa Oyenuga; Tolulope Odebunmi; Olasunmbo Okedele; Bert Uchino; Keith Horvath
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 7.  Internet Health Information Seeking and the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sharon Swee-Lin Tan; Nadee Goonawardene
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Online Social Engagement by Cancer Patients: A Clinic-Based Patient Survey.

Authors:  Lawrence C An; Lauren Wallner; Matthias Alexander Kirch
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2016-08-19

9.  Navigating cancer using online communities: a grounded theory of survivor and family experiences.

Authors:  Lydia Jo Harkin; Kinta Beaver; Paola Dey; Kartina Choong
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Michael S Cowher; Mohammed Al-Hamadani; Jody M Schoger; Alicia C Staley; Jeffrey Landercasper
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Online Medical Misinformation in Cancer: Distinguishing Fact From Fiction.

Authors:  Eleonora Teplinsky; Sara Beltrán Ponce; Emily K Drake; Ann Meredith Garcia; Stacy Loeb; G J van Londen; Deanna Teoh; Michael Thompson; Lidia Schapira
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 2.  The Rise of the Expert Patient in Cancer: From Backseat Passenger to Co-navigator.

Authors:  Andrea Anampa-Guzmán; Janet Freeman-Daily; Michael Fisch; Emil Lou; Nathan A Pennell; Corrie A Painter; Dorinda Sparacio; Mark A Lewis; Maimah Karmo; Patricia F Anderson; Stephanie L Graff
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Patients Are Knowledge Workers in the Clinical Information Space.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lerner Papautsky; Emily S Patterson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 4.  Netiquette for social media engagement for oncology professionals.

Authors:  Sara Beltrán Ponce; Maura M Barry; Don S Dizon; Matthew S Katz; Martina Murphy; Eleonora Teplinsky; Stacey Tinianov; Deanna J Attai; Merry Jennifer Markham
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  A collaborative learning health system agent-based model: Computational and face validity.

Authors:  Michael Seid; David Bridgeland; Alexandra Bridgeland; David M Hartley
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2021-04-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.