| Literature DB >> 33163381 |
Fazele Atarbashi-Moghadam1, Soofieh Moallemi-Pour2, Saede Atarbashi-Moghadam3, Soran Sijanivandi2, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Macronutrients and micronutrients present in different types of diet could influence different aspects of both inflammatory and immune responses; thereby, diets could influence oral health and the periodontal condition. The raw vegan diet is a subset of vegetarianism in which only uncooked plant-derived foods are consumed. The present study's aim was to evaluate the effect of the raw vegan diet on periodontal and dental health parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Dental caries; Diet; Oral hygiene; Periodontitis; Vegetarian
Year: 2020 PMID: 33163381 PMCID: PMC7605299 DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_161_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tzu Chi Med J ISSN: 1016-3190
Comparison of mean values, standard deviations, and P values of dental parameters in raw vegan and control groups using independent samples t-test
| Dental parameters | Mean±SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw vegans | Controls | ||
| DMF-S | 30.71±20.07 | 30.8±27.43 | 0.070 |
| DMF-T | 10.69±4.31 | 11.44±5.45 | 0.412 |
| DT | 1.49±2.32 | 2.44±3.53 | 0.087 |
| MT | 2.34±2.76 | 3.85±4.23 | 0.024 |
| FT | 6.83±3.72 | 5.17±3.33 | 0.012 |
SD: Standard deviation, DMF-S: Decayed, missing, filled teeth surfaces, DMF-T: Decayed, missing, filled teeth, DT: Decayed teeth, MT: Missing teeth, FT: Filled teeth
Comparison of mean values, standard deviations, and P values of periodontal parameters in raw vegan and control groups using independent samples t-test
| Periodontal parameters | Mean±SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw vegans | Controls | ||
| PPD (mm) | 1.86±0.34 | 2.01±0.46 | 0.047 |
| CAL (mm) | 0.64±0.79 | 0.64±0.88 | 0.983 |
| BOP (%) | 38.77±34.93 | 54.59±36.15 | 0.017 |
| GR (mm) | 0.33±0.56 | 0.31±0.55 | 0.851 |
SD: Standard deviation, PPD: Periodontal pocket depth, CAL: Clinical attachment loss, BOP: Bleeding on probing, GR: Gingival recession
The average, standard deviation, and P value of total number of teeth afflicted by furcation involvement and mobility in raw vegan and control groups, and number of teeth for each grade of mobility and furcation defect separately
| Clinical parameters | Raw vegans | Controls | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | SD | Average | SD | ||
| Furcation involvement | |||||
| Teeth with furcation defect ( | 0.77 | 1.46 | 0.49 | 0.97 | 0.210 |
| Teeth with different grades of furcation defects ( | |||||
| I | 40 | 45 | 0. 277 | ||
| II | 12 | 10 | |||
| III | 5 | 3 | |||
| IV | 2 | 1 | |||
| Tooth Mobility | |||||
| Teeth with mobility ( | 0.15 | 0.66 | 0.35 | 1.87 | 0.440 |
| Teeth with different grades of mobility ( | |||||
| 0 | 55 | 54 | 0.752 | ||
| 1 | 2 | 4 | |||
| 2 | 1 | 0 | |||
| 3 | 1 | 1 | |||
TIndependent samples t-test, MMann-Whitney test. SD: Standard deviation
Figure 1Comparison of simplified oral hygiene index in raw vegan and control groups using independent samples t-test; Debris Index (P = 0.046), Calculus Index (P = <0.001), simplified oral hygiene index (P = 0.001)