| Literature DB >> 33163290 |
Aridoss Santhakumar1, Malathi Mathiyazhakan1, Nagaraj Jaganathasamy1, Balsubramanian Ganesh1, N Manikandan1, V M Padmapriya1, Angel Monika1, Joseph K David2, Arvind Kumar3, Elangovan Arumugam1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in HIV prevalence and risk factors associated with HIV infection among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Odisha State, India.Entities:
Keywords: HIV prevalence; HIV sentinel surveillance; India; Odisha; Pregnant women; Socio-demographic factor
Year: 2020 PMID: 33163290 PMCID: PMC7604763 DOI: 10.21106/ijma.366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J MCH AIDS ISSN: 2161-864X
Figure 1HIV Prevalence among pregnant women attending ANC clinics in Odisha in the last six rounds of HIV Surveillance Survey (2007 – 2017)
Distribution and HIV Prevalence among Pregnant women in Odisha, last 3 rounds of the HIV Surveillance survey
| Variables | Category | 2013 (n= 12783) | 2015 (n=12801) | 2017 (n= 12800) | OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | HIV (%) | (%) | HIV (%) | (%) | HIV (%) | |||
| Age group | 15-24 | 57.6% | 0.24% | 56.0% | 0.20% | 54.3% | 0.26% | 1.00 |
| 25-49 | 42.4% | 0.41% | 44.0% | 0.30% | 45.7% | 0.31% | 1.45 (0.99 - 2.12) | |
| Educational status | Illiterate | 15.9% | 0.34% | 16.8% | 0.19% | 11.8% | 0.13% | 1.00 |
| Primary | 23.3% | 0.40% | 17.6% | 0.22% | 20.0% | 0.16% | 1.18 (0.59- 2.37) | |
| Secondary | 45.4% | 0.33% | 49.8% | 0.27% | 51.1% | 0.34% | 1.36 (0.75 - 2.49) | |
| Higher secondary and Above | 15.3% | 0.10% | 15.8% | 0.25% | 17.1% | 0.32% | 1.00 (0.47 - 2.12) | |
| Gravida | First | 51.2% | 0.29% | 50.2% | 0.25% | 46.3% | 0.30% | 1.00 |
| Second | 34.8% | 0.36% | 36.0% | 0.17% | 38.3% | 0.27% | 0.94 (0.62 - 1.44) | |
| Third | 10.7% | 0.15% | 10.3% | 0.38% | 11.5% | 0.20% | 0.86 (0.44-1.69) | |
| Fourth or more | 3.3% | 0.70% | 3.5% | 0.45% | 3.9% | 0.40% | 1.82 (0.83 - 4.02) | |
| Residence | Urban | 31.0% | 0.31% | 29.3% | 0.27% | 27.2% | 0.35% | 1.00 |
| Rural | 69.0% | 0.30% | 70.7% | 0.22% | 72.8% | 0.26% | 0.85 (0.56 - 1.28) | |
| Occupation of the respondent | AL | 2.2% | 0.00% | 1.8% | 0.45% | 1.0% | 0.79% | 1.00 |
| NAL | 2.5% | 0.00% | 1.9% | 0.00% | 0.9% | 0.92% | 0.47 (0.04 - 5.19) | |
| DS | 0.3% | 0.00% | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.1% | 0.00% | - | |
| S/SSW | 0.4% | 0.00% | 0.3% | 2.78% | 0.4% | 0.00% | 2.30 (0.21 - 25.58) | |
| PB/SSO | 0.4% | 0.00% | 0.2% | 0.00% | 0.2% | 0.00% | - | |
| SE/LBO | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | - | |
| Service (Govt./Pvt) | 2.3% | 0.00% | 2.5% | 0.63% | 1.7% | 0.45% | 1.14 (0.19- 6.84) | |
| Student | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.3% | 0.00% | 0.2% | 0.00% | - | |
| Hotel Staff | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | - | |
| Trucker | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | - | |
| LTW | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | - | |
| AC | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.8% | 0.00% | 0.1% | 0.00% | - | |
| House Wife | 91.6% | 0.34% | 92.2% | 0.22% | 95.3% | 0.27% | 0.88 (0.22 - 3.57) | |
| Occupation of the spouse | AL | 11.2% | 0.21% | 10.2% | 0.08% | 11.2% | 0.28% | 1.00 |
| NAL | 17.0% | 0.65% | 19.4% | 0.37% | 15.2% | 0.36% | 2.38 (1.09 - 5.20) | |
| DS | 0.3% | 0.00% | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.3% | 3.03% | 6.19 (0.77 - 50.02) | |
| S/SSW | 13.6% | 0.35% | 12.4% | 0.32% | 16.5% | 0.14% | 1.35 (0.56 -3.21) | |
| PB/SSO | 14.3% | 0.33% | 15.0% | 0.10% | 16.5% | 0.19% | 1.07 (0.44 - 2.62) | |
| SE/LBO | 3.8% | 0.41% | 2.7% | 0.29% | 2.4% | 0.00% | 1.36 (0.36 - 5.14) | |
| Service (Govt./Pvt) | 14.9% | 0.11% | 15.5% | 0.30% | 14.3% | 0.60% | 1.74 (0.76 - 3.98) | |
| Student | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.1% | 0.00% | - | |
| Hotel Staff | 1.8% | 0.44% | 1.1% | 0.70% | 1.1% | 0.00% | 2.05 (0.43 -9.70) | |
| Trucker | 2.3% | 0.34% | 2.0% | 0.38% | 2.6% | 1.20% | 3.53 (1.22 - 10.20) | |
| LTW | 6.2% | 0.38% | 6.1% | 0.51% | 5.9% | 0.27% | 2.02 (0.78 - 5.25) | |
| AC | 13.8% | 0.11% | 14.7% | 0.00% | 13.0% | 0.00% | 0.20 (0.04 - 0.92) | |
| Unemployed | 0.5% | 0.00% | 0.6% | 0.00% | 0.6% | 0.00% | - | |
| NA | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.1% | 10.00% | 0.4% | 0.00% | 7.99 (0.99 - 64.84) | |
| Spouse migration | Yes | 8.0% | 0.59% | 10.1% | 0.63% | 6.3% | 0.50% | 2.35 (1.41 - 3.91) |
| No | 92.0% | 0.29% | 89.9% | 0.19% | 93.7% | 0.26% | 1.00 | |
| Living with | Spouse | 99.9% | 0.31% | 99.9% | 0.24% | 99.6% | 0.28% | 1.00 |
| NA | 0.1% | 0.00% | 0.1% | 8.33% | 0.4% | 0.00% | 5.22 (0.72 - 37.91) | |
Significant at 5% level (P<0.05);
Significant at 0.5% level (P<0.005); 1 = Ref.- Reference category ,AL - Agricultural labor, NAL – Non-agricultural labor, DS- Domestic Servant, S/SSW Skilled/Semi Skilled worker, PB/SSO Petti Business/ Small Shop Owner, SE/LBO - Self-employed / Large Business Owner, Trucker- Truck driver / helper, LTW-local transport worker, AC – agricultural cultivator, NA – Not Applicable (Never married/Separated/Divorced/Widowed)
District-wise HIV Prevalence among ANC Population in Odisha last 3 rounds of the HIV Surveillance Survey
| District | 2013 | 2015 | 2017 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anugul | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| Balangir | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.50 | |
| Balasore | 1.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| Bargarh | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.00 | |
| Baudh | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | |
| Bhadrak | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | |
| Cuttack | 1.75 | 1.00 | 2.75 | |
| Deogarh | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| Dhenkanal | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| Gajapati | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Ganjam | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.00 | |
| Jagatsinghapur | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | |
| Jajapur | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | |
| Jharsuguda | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.50 | |
| Kalahandi | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.00 | |
| Kandhamal | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | |
| Kendrapara | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Kendujhar | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Khordha | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | |
| Koraput | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.00 | |
| Malkangiri | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Mayurbhanj | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| Nabarangapur | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1.00 | |
| Nayagarh | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| Nuapada | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Puri | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| Rayagada | 1.50 | 0.00 | 0.25 | |
| Sambalpur | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
| Sonapur | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Sundarearh | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
P < 0.05 (Chi square trend)
Sexual behavior among high-risk group in Odisha (Sourced from Integrated Behavioral and Biological Surveillance conducted among high-risk groups during 2014-2015)
| Sexual behavior of HRG | Odisha (Proportion %) | India (Proportion %) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSW | MSM | IDU | FSM | MSM | IDU | |
| First sexual intercourse at ≤ 14 years | 18.6 | 37.9 | 1.6 | 8.6 | 18.8 | 2.5 |
| First sexual intercourse at 15-17 years | 42.0 | 42.7 | 15.2 | 33.8 | 35.7 | 19.5 |
| Commercial sex at ≤ 14 years | 4.7 | 23.1 | - | 1.4 | 5.9 | - |
| Commercial sex at 15-17 years | 20.7 | 36.5 | - | 8.4 | 21.9 | - |
| Msm sexual debut at ≤ 14 years | - | 26.8 | - | - | 16.7 | - |
| Msm sexual debut at 15-17 years | - | 46.6 | - | - | 33.1 | - |
| Comprehensive knowledge on hiv | 58.1 | 59.5 | 47.6 | 42.5 | 45.5 | 42.6 |
| Aware that unprotected sex can cause hiv | 98.4 | 98.7 | 95.4 | 95.1 | 96.6 | 95.4 |
| Knows that ccu protects against hiv | 90.4 | 92.8 | 94.5 | 91.2 | 91.2 | 91.1 |
| Regular male partner | 91.8 | 78.5 | - | 62.2 | 54.3 | - |
| Ccu with regular male partner | 39.9 | 32.3 | - | 28.9 | 50.4 | - |
| Regular female partner | - | 46 | 82.1 | - | 48.2 | - |
| Ccu with regular female partner | - | 14 | 25.6 | - | 24.7 | - |
| Regular hijra partner | - | 61.4 | - | - | 21.8 | - |
| Ccu with regular hijra partner | - | 29.3 | - | - | 54.3 | - |
| Male/Hijra partner | - | - | 9.4 | - | - | 6.8 |
| CCU with Male/Hijra partner | - | - | 54.4 | - | - | 35.9 |