| Literature DB >> 33163015 |
Nana Asiedu1, Irene Kretchy2, Emmanuel Asampong1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is estimated that almost half of all people living with HIV have some form of neurocognitive impairment, but few studies have looked at the risk of neurocognitive impairment and its associated factors in Ghana, due in part to limited resources for such testing.Entities:
Keywords: ART adherence; depression; neurologic disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33163015 PMCID: PMC7609089 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v20i2.6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr Health Sci ISSN: 1680-6905 Impact factor: 0.927
Summary of Participant Characteristics
| Variable | Number (%) |
| Male | 22 (21.2) |
| Female | 82 (78.8) |
| Mean (SD) | 37.15 (10.06) |
| Basic | 22 (21.2) |
| Secondary | 67 (64.4) |
| Tertiary | 15 (14.4) |
| Employed | 87 (83.7) |
| Unemployed | 17 (16.3) |
| Mean (SD) | 4.75 (3.84) |
| 6 (0) | |
| CES-D score | 4.00 (4.47) |
| AUDIT score | 1.14 (3.21) |
| ART pills missed in past week | 0.086 (0.318) |
| TMT scores (seconds) | 67.77 (40.12 |
| Stroop Colour-word score (# of words) | 21.08 (9.75) |
| IHDS total score | 10.11 (1.58) |
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Association between different educational levels and IHDS score.
| Education | Educational status | Mean Difference | Std. Error | Sig. |
| Basic | Secondary | −.816 | .366 | .071 |
| Tertiary | −1.971 | .498 | <.0001 | |
| Secondary | Basic | .816 | .366 | .071 |
| Tertiary | −1.155 | .425 | .021 | |
| Tertiary | Basic | 1.971 | .498 | <.0001 |
| Secondary | 1.155 | .425 | .021 |
The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level
Association between age and IHDS score
| Variable | Age | IHDS score | |
| Age | Pearson | 1 | 0.391 |
| Correlation | |||
| Sig. | <0.0001 | ||
| IHDS score | Pearson | −0.391 | >1 |
| Correlation | |||
| Sig. | <0.0001 | ||
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Linear regression results for psycho-behavioural factors and risk of neurocognitive impairment
| NCI risk | B Coefficient | S.E. | t | P value | 95% CI |
| Depression | −0.082 | 0.038 | −2.15 | 0.034 | −0.158 – −.006 |
| Alcohol use | 0.045 | 0.054 | 0.84 | 0.402 | −0.062 – .152 |
| ART pills missed | 0.387 | 0.527 | 0.74 | 0.464 | −0.659 – 1.434 |
| Constant | 10.335 | 0.220 | 47.3 | <0.0001 | 9.898 – 10.771 |
Adjusted R2 = 0.0304 (F value = 1.951, df = 91, p = 0.127)
Figure 1BOC curve plot (sensitivity vs 1-specificity) with area under curve values
Association between Depression, age, educational level and NCI risk
| Variable | B Coefficient | S.E. | t | P value |
| Depression | −0.074 | 0.030 | −2.51 | 0.014 |
| Age | −0.055 | 0.013 | −4.12 | <0.0001 |
| Educational level | 0.406 | 0.099 | 0.74 | 0.464 |
| Constant | 10.612 | 0.758 | 13.9 | <0.0001 |
Adjusted R2= 0.0314 (F value = 15.086, df = 102, p<= 0.0001)