Literature DB >> 33162873

Underreporting of drug use on a survey of electronic dance music party attendees.

Joseph J Palamar1, Austin Le1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Skip-logic is commonly used on electronic surveys in which programs provide follow-up questions to affirmative responses and skip to the next topic in response to non-affirmative responses. While skip-logic helps produce data without contradictory responses, erroneous non-affirmative reports can lead to loss of accurate information. We examined the extent to which type-in drug use responses contradict unreported use in a survey of a high-risk population-electronic dance music (EDM) party attendees.
DESIGN: We surveyed 1029 EDM party-attending adults (ages 18-40) using time-spacing sampling in 2018. We examined the extent to which reporting of recent drug use via type-in responses occurred after past-year use of the same drugs were unreported earlier on the same survey. Changes in prevalence of use and predictors of providing discordant responses were examined.
RESULTS: 3.6% of participants typed in names of drugs they had used that they did not report using earlier on the survey. Changes in prevalence were not significant when correcting contradictory responses, but prevalence of past-year cocaine use increased from 23.3% to 24.3%. Those with a college degree were at lower odds for providing a discordant response (aOR = 0.13, p = .019). Females (aOR = 2.82, p = .022), those earning ≥$1000 per week (aOR = 11.03, p = .011), and those identifying as gay/lesbian (aOR = 5.20, p = .032) or bisexual or other sexuality (aOR = 15.12, p < .001) were at higher odds of providing a discordant response.
CONCLUSIONS: Electronic surveys that query drug use can benefit from follow-up (e.g. open-ended) questions not dependent on previous responses, as they may elicit affirmative responses underreported earlier in the survey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; data collection; drug use; survey methods; targeted population surveys

Year:  2019        PMID: 33162873      PMCID: PMC7643632          DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2019.1653860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Res Theory


  34 in total

1.  Decreased drug reporting in a cross-sectional student drug use survey.

Authors:  M Fendrich; M E Mackesy-Amiti
Journal:  J Subst Abuse       Date:  2000

2.  Assessing self-reported use of new psychoactive substances: The impact of gate questions.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Patricia Acosta; Fermín Fernández Calderón; Scott Sherman; Charles M Cleland
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  A comparison of the utility of urine- and hair testing in detecting self-reported drug use among young adult opioid users.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Austin Le; Honoria Guarino; Pedro Mateu-Gelabert
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Under-reporting bipolar disorder in large-scale epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Elie G Karam; Nancy Sampson; Lynn Itani; Laura Helena Andrade; Guilherme Borges; Wai Tat Chiu; Silvia Florescu; Itsuko Horiguchi; Zahari Zarkov; Hagop Akiskal
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Discordant reporting of nonmedical amphetamine use among Adderall-using high school seniors in the US.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Austin Le
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  The reliability and validity of drug users' self reports of amphetamine use among primarily heroin and cocaine users.

Authors:  Lucy E Napper; Dennis G Fisher; Mark E Johnson; Michele M Wood
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: results from a general population survey.

Authors:  Michael Fendrich; Timothy P Johnson; Joseph S Wislar; Amy Hubbell; Vina Spiehler
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Comparison between self-report and hair analysis of illicit drug use in a community sample of middle-aged men.

Authors:  David M Ledgerwood; Bruce A Goldberger; Nathan K Risk; Collins E Lewis; Rumi Kato Price
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Random responses inflate statistical estimates in heavily skewed addictions data.

Authors:  Kevin M King; Dale S Kim; Connor J McCabe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Discordant reporting of nonmedical opioid use in a nationally representative sample of US high school seniors.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Jenni A Shearston; Charles M Cleland
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.829

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risky Party and Nightclub Attendance during the COVID-19 Nightlife Shutdown in New York City.

Authors:  Austin Le; Alexis Wasserman; Joseph J Palamar
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.801

2.  Underreporting of past-year cannabis use on a national survey by people who smoke blunts.

Authors:  Austin Le; Benjamin H Han; Joseph J Palamar
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.716

3.  Discordant report of vaping of cannabis among high school seniors in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Austin Le
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.912

Review 4.  Drug checking at dance festivals: A review with recommendations to increase generalizability of findings.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Nicole D Fitzgerald; Katherine M Keyes; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.492

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.