Literature DB >> 3316237

Operation for acromioclavicular dislocation. A review of 29 cases treated by one method.

C D Warren-Smith1, M W Ward.   

Abstract

The place and effectiveness of surgery for acromioclavicular dislocation is disputed. We have reviewed 29 patients all treated by an operation which holds the clavicle down to the coracoid process. This was effective in both acute and late cases, with rapid return to work, a low incidence of complications and no requirement for secondary procedures. We consider it to be the method of choice when operation is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1987        PMID： 3316237     DOI： 10.1302/0301-620X.69B5.3316237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN： 0301-620X


  14 in total

1.  [The surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint separation with a resorbable PDS cord].

Authors:  M Rustemeier; H A Kulenkampff
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1990-04

2.  Luggage tag technique of anatomic fixation of displaced acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Keith Baldwin; Surena Namdari; Jaron R Andersen; Brian Lee; John M Itamura; G Russell Huffman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries: Is there really a difference between surgical management in the acute or chronic setting?

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-25

4.  Surgical treatment of acute type-V acromioclavicular injuries in athletes.

Authors:  E Verhaven; H DeBoeck; P Haentjens; F Handelberg; P P Casteleyn; P Opdecam
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Comparison of the outcome of early and delayed surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Tengfei Song; Xu Yan; Tianwen Ye
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Clinical results of coracoacromial ligament transfer in acromioclavicular dislocations: A review of published literature.

Authors:  Aman Sood; Nicholas Wallwork; Gregory Ian Bain
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2008-01

8.  Management of type 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocation: comparison of long-term functional results of two operative methods.

Authors:  Hari Kovilazhikathu Sugathan; Ronald Martin Dodenhoff
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2012-06-13

9.  Comparison of single and two-tunnel techniques during open treatment of acromioclavicular joint disruption.

Authors:  Zhiyong Hou; Jove Graham; Yingze Zhang; Kent Strohecker; Daniel Feldmann; Thomas R Bowen; Wei Chen; Wade Smith
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with coracoacromial ligament transfer using the docking technique.

Authors:  Peter J Millett; Sepp Braun; Reuben Gobezie; Iván H Pacheco
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.362
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.