Shivam Mehta1, Rebecca Dresner1, Vaibhav Gandhi2, Po-Jung Chen1, Veerasathpurush Allareddy3, Chia-Ling Kuo4, Jinjian Mu5, Sumit Yadav6. 1. Resident, Division of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, Connecticut. 2. Research Instructor, Division of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, Connecticut. 3. Department Head of Orthodontics, Brodie Craniofacial Endowed Chair, Professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Dentistry, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Senior Biostatistician, Connecticut Convergence Institute for Translation in Regenerative Engineering, Assistant Professor, Public Health Sciences, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, Connecticut. 5. PhD Candidate in Statistics, Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, Connecticut. 6. Associate Professor, Division of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, Connecticut. Electronic address: syadav@uchc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of single plane and multiplane rotational errors in yaw, pitch, and roll of the head while recording the lateral cephalogram on CVM (cervical vertebrae maturity) assessment. METHODS: A total of 40 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and 360 lateral cephalograms were analyzed for patients with different rotations: Controls (no rotation), Y5 (yaw 5° rotation), Y10 (yaw 10° rotation), R5 (roll 5° rotation), R10 (Roll 10° rotation), P5 (pitch 5° rotation), P10 (pitch 10° rotation), YRP5 (yaw, roll, and pitch 5° rotation), and YRP10 (yaw, roll, and pitch 10° rotation). The C2, C3, and C4 concavity and their base-anterior ratio and posterior-anterior ratio were measured. In addition, maxillomandibular linear parameters, such as effective mandibular length and height, mandibular body length, effective midface length, and maxillomandibular differential, were also evaluated. RESULTS: Y5, Y10, R5, and R10 led to overestimation of CVM in comparison with controls. Multiplane rotations (YRP5 and YRP10) led to more inaccuracies in CVM measurements than single plane rotations; 10° of rotation led to more inaccuracies than 5° of rotation while recording the lateral cephalogram, irrespective of the plane. Yaw rotational errors led to an underestimation of maxillomandibular linear measurements, whereas roll rotational errors led to an overestimation of the measurements; however, there were wide individual variations in the measurements between the different rotations and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Rotational errors lead to overestimation of CVM assessment. Multiplane rotations cause higher inaccuracies than single plane rotations. Increased degree of rotations while capturing the lateral cephalograms lead to more inaccuracies in CVM assessment.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of single plane and multiplane rotational errors in yaw, pitch, and roll of the head while recording the lateral cephalogram on CVM (cervical vertebrae maturity) assessment. METHODS: A total of 40 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and 360 lateral cephalograms were analyzed for patients with different rotations: Controls (no rotation), Y5 (yaw 5° rotation), Y10 (yaw 10° rotation), R5 (roll 5° rotation), R10 (Roll 10° rotation), P5 (pitch 5° rotation), P10 (pitch 10° rotation), YRP5 (yaw, roll, and pitch 5° rotation), and YRP10 (yaw, roll, and pitch 10° rotation). The C2, C3, and C4 concavity and their base-anterior ratio and posterior-anterior ratio were measured. In addition, maxillomandibular linear parameters, such as effective mandibular length and height, mandibular body length, effective midface length, and maxillomandibular differential, were also evaluated. RESULTS: Y5, Y10, R5, and R10 led to overestimation of CVM in comparison with controls. Multiplane rotations (YRP5 and YRP10) led to more inaccuracies in CVM measurements than single plane rotations; 10° of rotation led to more inaccuracies than 5° of rotation while recording the lateral cephalogram, irrespective of the plane. Yaw rotational errors led to an underestimation of maxillomandibular linear measurements, whereas roll rotational errors led to an overestimation of the measurements; however, there were wide individual variations in the measurements between the different rotations and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Rotational errors lead to overestimation of CVM assessment. Multiplane rotations cause higher inaccuracies than single plane rotations. Increased degree of rotations while capturing the lateral cephalograms lead to more inaccuracies in CVM assessment.
Authors: Maria Inês Magalhães; Vanessa Machado; Paulo Mascarenhas; João Botelho; José João Mendes; Ana Sintra Delgado Journal: Eur J Orthod Date: 2022-09-19 Impact factor: 3.131