| Literature DB >> 33161453 |
Anna Mele1, Eleonora Prete2, Clara De Risi2, Stefania Citiso2, Giuseppina Greco2, Antonietta Pia Falcone3, Grazia Sanpaolo3, Giuseppe Mele4, Angela Giannotta4, Carolina Vergine5, Giovanni Reddiconto5, Giulia Palazzo6, Sabrina Sabatelli6, Candida Germano7, Rosanna Miccolis7, Paola Curci8, Gaetano Palumbo9, Massimo Offidani10, Rita Rizzi8, Nicola Cascavilla3, Domenico Pastore4, Nicola Di Renzo5, Patrizio Mazza6, Giuseppe Tarantini7, Attilio Guarini11, Silvana Capalbo9, Giorgina Specchia8, Antonino Greco2, Rosa De Francesco2, Silvia Sibilla2, Lorenzo Tonialini2, Maria Rosaria Morciano2, Vincenzo Pavone2.
Abstract
Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) have been approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on ASPIRE clinical trial. However, its effectiveness and safety profile in real clinical practice should be further assessed. We retrospectively evaluated 130 consecutive RRMM patients treated with KRd between December 2015 and August 2018, in 9 Hematology Departments of Rete Ematologica Pugliese (REP). The overall response rate (ORR) was 79%, with 37% complete response (CR). Treatment with KRd led to an improvement in response regardless of age, refractory disease, and number and type of previous therapies. After a median follow-up of 18 months, median PFS was 24 months and 2y-PFS was 54%. PFS was longer in patients achieving a very good partial response (VGPR) with median PFS of 32.4 months. The relapses after prior autologous transplant (ASCT) positively impact median PFS. Several baseline disease characteristics, such as III ISS scoring or elevated LDH, and prior exposure to lenalidomide were found to negatively impact PFS. Primary refractory or relapsed myeloma patients have been treated with KRd as bridge to ASCT with a great benefit. Thirty-four (83%) reached at least a partial response after KRd and 21 (61%) performed ASCT. In transplanted patients, median PFS was not reached and 2y-PFS was 100%. The treatment discontinuation rate due to adverse events (AEs) was 18%, most commonly for lenalidomide (11%). Overall, in 10% of patients, a KRd dose reduction was necessary at least once (2.5% for carfilzomib and 8% for lenalidomide). The most frequent AE was neutropenia (44%) and anemia (41%). Infections occurred in 14% of patients. Cardiovascular events occurred in 11% of patients. Elderly patients have tolerated therapy very well, without additional side effects compared to younger patients, except for cardiac impairment. Our analysis confirmed that KRd is effective in RRMM patients. It is well tolerated and applicable to the majority of patients outside clinical trials. A longer PFS was shown in patients achieving VGPR, in those lenalidomide naïve and in patients relapsing after previous ASCT. Previous ASCT should not hamper the option for KRd therapy. Accordingly, KRd should be used as bridge regimen to ASCT with remarkable improvement in response and PFS rates. Further clinical studies are needed.Entities:
Keywords: Autologous transplant and carfilzomib; Carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd); KRd as bridge therapy; Real-life experience; Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Year: 2020 PMID: 33161453 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04329-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 3.673