Literature DB >> 33161275

Lower body kinematics estimation from wearable sensors for walking and running: A deep learning approach.

Vincent Hernandez1, Davood Dadkhah2, Vahid Babakeshizadeh3, Dana Kulić4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are promising tools for collecting human movement data. Model-based filtering approaches (e.g. Extended Kalman Filter) have been proposed to estimate joint angles from IMUs data but little is known about the potential of data-driven approaches. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can deep learning models accurately predict lower limb joint angles from IMU data during gait?
METHODS: Lower-limb kinematic data were simultaneously measured with a marker-based motion capture system and running leggings with 5 integrated IMUs measuring acceleration and angular velocity at the pelvis, thighs and tibias. Data acquisition was performed on 27 participants (26.5 (3.9) years, 1.75 (0.07) m, 68.3 (10.0) kg) while walking at 4 and 6 km/h and running at 8, 10, 12 and 14 km/h on a treadmill. The model input consists of raw IMU data, while the output estimates the joint angles of the lower body. The model was trained with a nested k-fold cross-validation and tested considering a user-independent approach. Mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE) and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were computed between the ground truth and predicted joint angles.
RESULTS: MAE for the DOFs ranged from 2.2(0.9) to 5.1(2.7)° with an average of 3.6(2.1)°. r ranged from 0.67(0.23) to 0.99(0.01) with moderate correlation (0.4≤r<0.7) was found for the hip right rotation and lumbar extension, strong correlation (0.7≤r<0.9) was found for the hip left rotation and ankle right/left inversion while all other DOFs showed very strong correlation (r≥0.9). SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed model can reliably predict joint kinematics for walking, running and gait transitions without specific knowledge about the body characteristics of the wearer, or the position and orientation of the IMU relative to the attached segment. These results have been validated with treadmill gait, and have not yet been confirmed for gait in other settings.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Gait analysis; Inertial measurement unit; Joint kinematics; Treadmill validation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33161275     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  8 in total

1.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Recent Machine Learning Progress in Lower Limb Running Biomechanics With Wearable Technology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liangliang Xiang; Alan Wang; Yaodong Gu; Liang Zhao; Vickie Shim; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.493

3.  Performance of Deep Learning Models in Forecasting Gait Trajectories of Children with Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Rania Kolaghassi; Mohamad Kenan Al-Hares; Gianluca Marcelli; Konstantinos Sirlantzis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Population and Age-Based Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level Investigation and Automatic Prediction.

Authors:  Liangliang Xiang; Kaili Deng; Qichang Mei; Zixiang Gao; Tao Yang; Alan Wang; Justin Fernandez; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-05

5.  A Deep Learning Method for Foot Progression Angle Detection in Plantar Pressure Images.

Authors:  Peter Ardhianto; Raden Bagus Reinaldy Subiakto; Chih-Yang Lin; Yih-Kuen Jan; Ben-Yi Liau; Jen-Yung Tsai; Veit Babak Hamun Akbari; Chi-Wen Lung
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Matching Model of Dance Movements and Music Rhythm Features Using Human Posture Estimation.

Authors:  Dandan Jiang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-13

7.  Gait Synergy Analysis and Modeling on Amputees and Stroke Patients for Lower Limb Assistive Devices.

Authors:  Feng-Yan Liang; Fei Gao; Junyi Cao; Sheung-Wai Law; Wei-Hsin Liao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Predicting Knee Joint Kinematics from Wearable Sensor Data in People with Knee Osteoarthritis and Clinical Considerations for Future Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Jay-Shian Tan; Sawitchaya Tippaya; Tara Binnie; Paul Davey; Kathryn Napier; J P Caneiro; Peter Kent; Anne Smith; Peter O'Sullivan; Amity Campbell
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.