Incidence rates of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 in patients with psoriasis receiving biological treatment: A Northern Italy experience.

INTRODUCTION: Whether biologic therapies enhance the risk of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) or affect the disease outcome in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis remains to be ascertained.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the incidence of hospitalization and death for COVID-19 in a large sample of patients with plaque psoriasis receiving biologic therapies compared with the general population.
METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study including patients with chronic plaque psoriasis (n = 6501) being treated with biologic therapy and regularly followed up at the divisions of dermatology of several main hospitals in the Northern Italian cities of Verona, Padua, Vicenza, Modena, Bologna, Piacenza, Turin, and Milan. Incidence rates of hospitalization and death per 10,000 person-months with exact mid-p 95% CIs and standardized incidence ratios were estimated in the patients with psoriasis and compared with those in the general population in the same geographic areas.
RESULTS: The incidence rate of hospitalization for COVID-19 was 11.7 (95% CI, 7.2-18.1) per 10,000 person-months in patients with psoriasis and 14.4 (95% CI, 14.3-14.5) in the general population; the incidence rate of death from COVID-19 was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.2-4.3) and 4.7 (95% CI, 4.6-4.7) in patients with psoriasis and the general population, respectively. The standardized incidence ratio of hospitalization and death in patients with psoriasis compared with those in the general population was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.57-1.45; P = .82) and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.07-1.38; P = .19), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data did not show any adverse impact of biologics on COVID-19 outcome in patients with psoriasis. We would not advise biologic discontinuation in patients on treatment since more than 6 months and not infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 to prevent hospitalization and death from COVID-19.

Introduction

Italy has been deeply affected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, particularly in the northern regions. There is substantial concern among physicians regarding an increased risk of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in patients who are being treated with biologic therapies. However, whether biologics enhance this risk and/or whether the disease course is worsened by the immunosuppressive/immunomodulating treatment remains to be determined. It is debated whether biologics for psoriasis should be interrupted for preventing severe complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection such as interstitial pneumonia. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection seems to be most fatal when it triggers a cytokine storm, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17. , Therefore, biologics are being investigated as treatments for COVID-19.

In this study, we evaluated the incidence of hospitalization and death for COVID-19 in a large sample of patients with plaque psoriasis receiving biologic therapies compared with the general population.

Results and discussion

The characteristics of the studied population are reported in Table I .6, 7, 8, 9 The prevalence of male sex and comorbidities (obesity, arterial hypertension, and diabetes) was significantly higher in patients with psoriasis than in the general population. We estimated the incidence rate of hospitalization and death for COVID-19 in 6501 patients with plaque psoriasis receiving biologic therapies, corresponding to 15,378.5 patient-months of follow-up, and compared the figures with those obtained from the general adult population of Northern Italy, corresponding to 19,978,806 subjects and 47,260,897.6 patient-months of follow-up. The incidence rate of hospitalization for COVID-19 was 11.7 (95% CI, 7.2-18.1) per 10,000 person-months in patients with psoriasis and 14.4 (95% CI, 14.3-14.5) in the general population; the incidence rate of death from COVID-19 was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.2-4.3) and 4.7 (95% CI, 4.6-4.7) in patients with psoriasis and the general population, respectively. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of hospitalization and death in patients with psoriasis compared with the general population was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.57-1.45; P = .82) and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.07-1.38; P = .19), respectively. We found no significant difference in the rates of hospitalization with the general population when stratifying by age (<65 vs ≥65 years) or by class of biologic (Table I). There were no further deaths for other causes during the study period. We had 1865 of 6501 (ie, 28.7%) patients affected by psoriatic arthritis. Four of 18 hospitalized patients with psoriasis had psoriatic arthritis, whereas none of the dead ones had psoriatic arthritis. All the hospitalized patients fully recovered from the viral infection and then restarted biologic therapy because of psoriasis relapse after a period of time ranging from 6 to 15 weeks from the hospital discharge. They are currently on biologic.

Table I

Number of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis being treated with biologic therapy or subjects of the general population of Veneto, Lombardy, Emilia Romagna, and Piedmont hospitalized for or died from COVID-19 from February 20 to May 1, 2020

Parameter, n (%)	Patients with psoriasis	General population (18+ y)	SIR (95% CI)	P value∗
Number (patient-months)	6,501 (15,378.5)	19,978,806 (47,260,897.6)	—	—
Outcome measure
Subjects positive for SARS-CoV-2 (IR, 95% CI)	†	144,909 (30.7, 30.5-30.8)	—	—
Hospitalized for COVID-19 (IR, 95% CI)	18 (11.7, 7.2-18.1)	68,099 (14.4, 14.3-14.5)	0.94 (0.57-1.45)	.82
Deaths for COVID-19 (IR, 95% CI)	2 (1.3, 0.2-4.3)	22,013 (4.7, 4.6-4.7)	0.42 (0.07-1.38)	.19
Demography
Sex: male, n (%)	3,616 (55.6)	9,649,834 (48.3)	—	<.001
Age (y), mean ± SD	53.4 ± 11.0	52.3 ± 20.0	—	<.001
<65, n (%)	5,071 (78.0)	14,403,251 (72.1)	0.68 (0.30-1.35)‡	.31
≥65, n (%)	1,430 (22.0)	5,575,555 (27.9)	1.06 (0.56-1.85)‡	.80
Comorbidity, n (%)
Obesity	1,633 (25.1)	2,081,748 (10.4)	—	<.001
Hypertension	2,012 (30.9)	4,261,658 (21.3)	—	<.001
Diabetes mellitus	854 (13.1)	1,124,563 (5.6)	—	<.001
Psoriatic arthritis	1,865 (28.7)	—	—	—
Biologic therapy, n (%)
TNF-α inhibitors	2,106 (32.4)	—	1.02 (0.41-2.12)‡	.91
IL-17 inhibitors	2,486 (38.2)	—	0.80 (0.32-1.67)‡	.62
IL-12/IL-23 inhibitors	1,691 (26.0)	—	0.98 (0.36-2.17)‡	1
IL-23 inhibitors	218 (3.3)	—	1.45 (0.07-7.16)‡	.65

IR, Incidence rate × 10,000 person-months.

Data of subjects hospitalized for or died from COVID-19 in the general population are from the Civil Protection Official Repository and from the National Health Institute (ISS).

Data of patients with psoriasis hospitalized for or died from COVID-19 are from electronic medical records of the participating hospitals (accessed May 1, 2020).

Data of comorbidities in the general population are from Istituto Nazionale di Statistica multipurpose survey 2019.

Exact mid-p test was reported for SIR. Pearson χ2 test and 2-sample t test were used for the comparison of nominal and continuous variables between groups.

Asymptomatic individuals were not tested, and so the true number of COVID-19–positive patients is unknown.

SIR for COVID-19 hospitalization was reported.

The major finding of our study is that although patients with psoriatic treated by biologics are burdened by higher rates of metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities, there was no evidence for an increased risk of hospitalization or death from COVID-19 in those patients compared with the general population. Accordingly, some preliminary data on TNF-α inhibitors and IL-12/IL-23 inhibitors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease showed that these therapies do not worsen the clinical course of COVID-19 compared with sulfasalazine/mesalamine or no treatment. On the contrary, biologics appeared to be associated with a better outcome, even though there were insufficient data to make definite statements. Some systemic complications caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection appear to be associated with excessive inflammatory and cytokine responses. Therefore, treatments that reduce the host inflammatory response, including agents blocking TNF-α, IL-6, or IL-17 pathways, in combination with therapies that have direct antiviral activity, have been proposed, and are currently under investigation for the treatment of COVID-19.12, 13, 14

We acknowledge the limitations of our study, including the absence of serological or molecular investigations for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic patients with psoriasis. The objective of our study was not to investigate the prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, but to report the occurrence of hospitalization and death, as indicators of severe outcomes related to COVID-19. Despite a cohort of 6501 patients with psoriasis receiving biologic treatment, we collected relatively few COVID-19 cases, with wide CIs. The low rates in patients treated with biologics are reassuring, especially considering that these patients had a high prevalence of comorbidities that are usually associated with a worse COVID-19 course. Despite the fact that a great effort has been made in retrieving patients with COVID-19, we acknowledge that there is still a possibility that we have missed important cases. However, on the basis of a simulation analysis on our sample size, we estimated that around 3 missed deaths would be required to observe an SIR of 1 and at least 8 deaths for an SIR of more than 2 with P value less than .05. However, we would have missed at least 11 hospitalized patients to observe an SIR of more than 1.5 with P value less than .05. Therefore, it is unlikely that we have missed a number of patients needed to completely change our results.

There were no new patients starting biological treatment from February 20 to May 1 in our divisions of dermatology. This is because this time period was overlapping with the lockdown imposed by the Italian government. During that period, public health measures required citizens to stay at home and shield. The clinical dermatological activity was significantly reduced and mostly dedicated to teleconsultation for those patients already on treatment. The access to the hospitals was limited only to symptomatic patients with fever, suspected for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The major strengths of our study are the cohort study design, the focus on Italian regions most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and the completeness of the database. We acknowledge that patients on biologic drugs may have self-isolated more efficiently, thus limiting their own infectious risk. We can rule out that there have been deaths at home that we are not aware of and/or that patients have gone to hospitals outside their catchment area. Our findings are consistent with those of another study that reported that patients with psoriasis on biologics were not at an increased risk of intensive care unit admission or death; conversely, the study found that patients were at a higher risk for testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, to be self-quarantined at home or hospitalized.

The results of our study show that the continuation of biologic therapies during the pandemic does not influence the development of severe complications of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. A prophylactic treatment discontinuation in an attempt to prevent a negative outcome of COVID-19 may not be required. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings.

For detailed methods, please see the Methods section in this article’s Online Repository at www.jacionline.org.

Biologic discontinuation in patients with psoriasis on treatment to prevent hospitalization and death from COVID-19 is not advisable, unless they are infected with SARS-CoV-2.