Ricardo G Pastorello1, Güliz A Barkan2, Mauro Saieg3. 1. Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Loyola University Healthcare System, Maywood, Illinois; Department of Urology, Loyola University Healthcare System, Maywood, Illinois. 3. Department of Pathology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Pathology, Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: mauro.saieg@accamargo.org.br.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was first published in 2016 with clear objectives to standardize cytologic diagnostic criteria and provide uniform reporting, in order to improve patient stratification and associated clinical management. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the performance of TPS and review the literature published since TPS was introduced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Original articles focusing on the utilization and performance of TPS in urinary cytology specimens were identified using PubMed for publications from January 2016 to July 2020, using the keywords "Paris System", "urine cytology", and "urinary cytology". RESULTS: Twenty-three relevant articles in the literature regarding the use of TPS were included in the review from a total of 30,802 urine cytology specimens, of which 21,485 (69.8%) had available diagnoses. Distribution of cases among categories ranged from 50.5% to 95.3% for negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), 1.2% to 23% for atypical urothelial cells (AUC), 0.2% to 6.6% for suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (SHGUC), and 2.2% to 14.1% for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (HGUC). The calculated risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) ranged from 8.7% to 36.8% for NHGUC, 12.3% to 60.9%% for AUC, 33.3% to 100% for SHGUC, and 58.8% to 100% for HGUC. Mean ROHM weighted by sample size was calculated at 15.7% (±7.8%), 38.5% (±14.3%), 76.2% (±17.2%), and 88.8% (±12.7%) for NHGUC, AUC, SHGUC, and HGUC, respectively. Reported sensitivity of TPS ranged from 40% to 84.7%, specificity from 73% to 100%, PPV from 62.3% to 100%, and NPV from 46% to 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The application of TPS in the selected series has improved the screening and surveillance potential of urine cytology, while reducing high rates of indeterminate diagnoses, improving sensitivity and providing proper risk stratification for patients.
INTRODUCTION: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was first published in 2016 with clear objectives to standardize cytologic diagnostic criteria and provide uniform reporting, in order to improve patient stratification and associated clinical management. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the performance of TPS and review the literature published since TPS was introduced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Original articles focusing on the utilization and performance of TPS in urinary cytology specimens were identified using PubMed for publications from January 2016 to July 2020, using the keywords "Paris System", "urine cytology", and "urinary cytology". RESULTS: Twenty-three relevant articles in the literature regarding the use of TPS were included in the review from a total of 30,802 urine cytology specimens, of which 21,485 (69.8%) had available diagnoses. Distribution of cases among categories ranged from 50.5% to 95.3% for negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), 1.2% to 23% for atypical urothelial cells (AUC), 0.2% to 6.6% for suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (SHGUC), and 2.2% to 14.1% for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (HGUC). The calculated risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) ranged from 8.7% to 36.8% for NHGUC, 12.3% to 60.9%% for AUC, 33.3% to 100% for SHGUC, and 58.8% to 100% for HGUC. Mean ROHM weighted by sample size was calculated at 15.7% (±7.8%), 38.5% (±14.3%), 76.2% (±17.2%), and 88.8% (±12.7%) for NHGUC, AUC, SHGUC, and HGUC, respectively. Reported sensitivity of TPS ranged from 40% to 84.7%, specificity from 73% to 100%, PPV from 62.3% to 100%, and NPV from 46% to 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The application of TPS in the selected series has improved the screening and surveillance potential of urine cytology, while reducing high rates of indeterminate diagnoses, improving sensitivity and providing proper risk stratification for patients.