Literature DB >> 33160637

Machine learning analyses of automated performance metrics during granular sub-stitch phases predict surgeon experience.

Andrew B Chen1, Siqi Liang2, Jessica H Nguyen1, Yan Liu2, Andrew J Hung3.   

Abstract

Automated performance metrics objectively measure surgeon performance during a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Machine learning has demonstrated that automated performance metrics, especially during the vesico-urethral anastomosis of the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, are predictive of long-term outcomes such as continence recovery time. This study focuses on automated performance metrics during the vesico-urethral anastomosis, specifically on stitch versus sub-stitch levels, to distinguish surgeon experience. During the vesico-urethral anastomosis, automated performance metrics, recorded by a systems data recorder (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), were reported for each overall stitch (Ctotal) and its individual components: needle handling/targeting (C1), needle driving (C2), and suture cinching (C3) (Fig 1, A). These metrics were organized into three datasets (GlobalSet [whole stitch], RowSet [independent sub-stitches], and ColumnSet [associated sub-stitches] (Fig 1, B) and applied to three machine learning models (AdaBoost, gradient boosting, and random forest) to solve two classifications tasks: experts (≥100 cases) versus novices (<100 cases) and ordinary experts (≥100 and <2,000 cases) versus super experts (≥2,000 cases). Classification accuracy was determined using analysis of variance. Input features were evaluated through a Jaccard index. From 68 vesico-urethral anastomoses, we analyzed 1,570 stitches broken down into 4,708 sub-stitches. For both classification tasks, ColumnSet best distinguished experts (n = 8) versus novices (n = 9) and ordinary experts (n = 5) versus super experts (n = 3) at an accuracy of 0.774 and 0.844, respectively. Feature ranking highlighted Endowrist articulation and needle handling/targeting as most important in classification. Surgeon performance measured by automated performance metrics on a granular sub-stitch level more accurately distinguishes expertise when compared with summary automated performance metrics over whole stitches.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33160637      PMCID: PMC8093318          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  4 in total

1.  Technical Skill Impacts the Success of Sequential Robotic Suturing Substeps.

Authors:  Daniel I Sanford; Balint Der; Taseen F Haque; Runzhuo Ma; Ryan Hakim; Jessica H Nguyen; Steven Cen; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Surgomics: personalized prediction of morbidity, mortality and long-term outcome in surgery using machine learning on multimodal data.

Authors:  Martin Wagner; Johanna M Brandenburg; Sebastian Bodenstedt; André Schulze; Alexander C Jenke; Antonia Stern; Marie T J Daum; Lars Mündermann; Fiona R Kolbinger; Nithya Bhasker; Gerd Schneider; Grit Krause-Jüttler; Hisham Alwanni; Fleur Fritz-Kebede; Oliver Burgert; Dirk Wilhelm; Johannes Fallert; Felix Nickel; Lena Maier-Hein; Martin Dugas; Marius Distler; Jürgen Weitz; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Executive summary of the artificial intelligence in surgery series.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Alexander P J Vlaar; Andrew J Hung; Azra Bihorac; Bradley M Dennis; Catherine Juillard; Daniel A Hashimoto; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Patrick J Tighe; Paul C Kuo; Shuhei Miyashita; Steven D Wexner; Kevin E Behrns
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 4.348

4.  Differential Performance of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Procedure-Specific Outcomes.

Authors:  Kevin A Chen; Matthew E Berginski; Chirag S Desai; Jose G Guillem; Jonathan Stem; Shawn M Gomez; Muneera R Kapadia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.267

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.