Literature DB >> 33159712

Ensemble modelling, uncertainty and robust predictions of organic carbon in long-term bare-fallow soils.

Roberta Farina1, Renata Sándor2,3, Mohamed Abdalla4, Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes5, Luca Bechini6, Martin A Bolinder7, Lorenzo Brilli8, Claire Chenu9, Hugues Clivot10,11, Massimiliano De Antoni Migliorati12, Claudia Di Bene1, Christopher D Dorich13, Fiona Ehrhardt14, Fabien Ferchaud10, Nuala Fitton4, Rosa Francaviglia1, Uwe Franko15, Donna L Giltrap16, Brian B Grant17, Bertrand Guenet18,19, Matthew T Harrison20, Miko U F Kirschbaum16, Katrin Kuka21, Liisa Kulmala22, Jari Liski22, Matthew J McGrath18, Elizabeth Meier23, Lorenzo Menichetti7, Fernando Moyano24, Claas Nendel25,26, Sylvie Recous27, Nils Reibold24, Anita Shepherd4,28, Ward N Smith17, Pete Smith4, Jean-François Soussana14, Tommaso Stella25, Arezoo Taghizadeh-Toosi29, Elena Tsutskikh25, Gianni Bellocchi3.   

Abstract

Simulation models represent soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in global carbon (C) cycle scenarios to support climate-change studies. It is imperative to increase confidence in long-term predictions of SOC dynamics by reducing the uncertainty in model estimates. We evaluated SOC simulated from an ensemble of 26 process-based C models by comparing simulations to experimental data from seven long-term bare-fallow (vegetation-free) plots at six sites: Denmark (two sites), France, Russia, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The decay of SOC in these plots has been monitored for decades since the last inputs of plant material, providing the opportunity to test decomposition without the continuous input of new organic material. The models were run independently over multi-year simulation periods (from 28 to 80 years) in a blind test with no calibration (Bln) and with the following three calibration scenarios, each providing different levels of information and/or allowing different levels of model fitting: (a) calibrating decomposition parameters separately at each experimental site (Spe); (b) using a generic, knowledge-based, parameterization applicable in the Central European region (Gen); and (c) using a combination of both (a) and (b) strategies (Mix). We addressed uncertainties from different modelling approaches with or without spin-up initialization of SOC. Changes in the multi-model median (MMM) of SOC were used as descriptors of the ensemble performance. On average across sites, Gen proved adequate in describing changes in SOC, with MMM equal to average SOC (and standard deviation) of 39.2 (±15.5) Mg C/ha compared to the observed mean of 36.0 (±19.7) Mg C/ha (last observed year), indicating sufficiently reliable SOC estimates. Moving to Mix (37.5 ± 16.7 Mg C/ha) and Spe (36.8 ± 19.8 Mg C/ha) provided only marginal gains in accuracy, but modellers would need to apply more knowledge and a greater calibration effort than in Gen, thereby limiting the wider applicability of models.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bare-fallow soils; model parametrization; process-based models; protocol for model comparison; soil organic carbon dynamics

Year:  2020        PMID: 33159712     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  2 in total

1.  Exploring the effects of land management change on productivity, carbon and nutrient balance: Application of an Ensemble Modelling Approach to the upper River Taw observatory, UK.

Authors:  Kirsty L Hassall; Kevin Coleman; Prakash N Dixit; Steve J Granger; Yusheng Zhang; Ryan T Sharp; Lianhai Wu; Andrew P Whitmore; Goetz M Richter; Adrian L Collins; Alice E Milne
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 10.753

2.  How Modelers Model: the Overlooked Social and Human Dimensions in Model Intercomparison Studies.

Authors:  Fabrizio Albanito; David McBey; Matthew Harrison; Pete Smith; Fiona Ehrhardt; Arti Bhatia; Gianni Bellocchi; Lorenzo Brilli; Marco Carozzi; Karen Christie; Jordi Doltra; Christopher Dorich; Luca Doro; Peter Grace; Brian Grant; Joël Léonard; Mark Liebig; Cameron Ludemann; Raphael Martin; Elizabeth Meier; Rachelle Meyer; Massimiliano De Antoni Migliorati; Vasileios Myrgiotis; Sylvie Recous; Renáta Sándor; Val Snow; Jean-François Soussana; Ward N Smith; Nuala Fitton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 11.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.