Literature DB >> 33159515

Mutant p53 oncogenicity: dominant-negative or gain-of-function?

Yan Stein1, Ronit Aloni-Grinstein1,2, Varda Rotter1.   

Abstract

The p53 protein is mutated in about 50% of human cancers. Aside from losing its tumor-suppressive activities, mutant p53 may acquire pro-oncogenic activity, which is facilitated by two underlying mechanisms. The first mechanism is the inhibition of co-expressed wild-type p53 (WTp53) activity, dubbed the dominant-negative effect (DNE). The second mechanism is a neomorphic pro-oncogenic activity that does not involve the inhibition of WTp53, termed gain-of-function (GOF). Throughout the years, both mechanisms were demonstrated in a plethora of in vitro and in vivo models. However, whether both account for protumorigenic activities of mutant p53 and in which contexts is still a matter of ongoing debate. Here, we discuss evidence for both DNE and GOF in a variety of models. These models suggest that both GOF and DNE can be relevant, but are highly dependent on the specific mutation type, genetic and cellular context and even the phenotype that is being assessed. In addition, we discuss how mutant and WTp53 might not exist as two separate entities, but rather as a continuum that may involve a balance between the two forms in the same cells, which could be tilted by various factors and drugs. Further elucidation of the factors that dictate the balance between the WT and mutant p53 states, as well as the factors that govern the impact of DNE and GOF in different cancer types, may lead to the development of more effective treatment regimens for cancer patients.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33159515     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  4 in total

1.  Differences in somatic TP53 mutation type in breast tumors by race and receptor status.

Authors:  Nijole C Pollock; Johnny R Ramroop; Heather Hampel; Melissa A Troester; Kathleen Conway; Jennifer J Hu; Jo L Freudenheim; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dezheng Huo; Elad Ziv; Susan L Neuhausen; Patrick Stevens; Joseph Paul McElroy; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Mutant p53 in cell-cell interactions.

Authors:  Steven Pilley; Tristan A Rodriguez; Karen H Vousden
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  p53 and Zinc: A Malleable Relationship.

Authors:  Jeung-Hoi Ha; Orjola Prela; Darren R Carpizo; Stewart N Loh
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 4.  Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: Mutation of TP53 Is a Biomarker of Hereditary Predisposition to Tumor: New Insights and Advances in the Treatment.

Authors:  Valentina Rocca; Giovanni Blandino; Lucia D'Antona; Rodolfo Iuliano; Silvia Di Agostino
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.575

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.