Nina Pocuca1, T Jordan Walter1, Arpi Minassian1,2, Jared W Young1,3, Mark A Geyer1,3, William Perry1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. 2. Center for Stress and Mental Health, Veteran's Administration San Diego Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA. 3. Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Older adults (≥50 years) represent the fastest-growing population of people who use cannabis, potentially due to the increasing promotion of cannabis as medicine by dispensaries and cannabis websites. Given healthy aging and cannabis use are both associated with cognitive decline, it is important to establish the effects of cannabis on cognition in healthy aging. OBJECTIVE: This systematic scoping review used preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines to critically examine the extent of literature on this topic and highlight areas for future research. METHOD: A search of six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Family and Society Studies Worldwide, and CINAHL) for articles published by September 2019, yielded 1,014 unique results. RESULTS: Six articles reported findings for older populations (three human and three rodent studies), highlighting the paucity of research in this area. Human studies revealed largely null results, likely due to several methodological limitations. Better-controlled rodent studies indicate that the relationship between ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cognitive function in healthy aging depends on age and level of THC exposure. Extremely low doses of THC improved cognition in very old rodents. Somewhat higher chronic doses improved cognition in moderately aged rodents. No studies examined the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) or high-CBD cannabis on cognition. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic scoping review provides crucial, timely direction for future research on this emerging issue. Future research that combines neuroimaging and cognitive assessment would serve to advance understanding of the effects of age and quantity of THC and CBD on cognition in healthy aging. Published by Oxford University Press 2020.
BACKGROUND: Older adults (≥50 years) represent the fastest-growing population of people who use cannabis, potentially due to the increasing promotion of cannabis as medicine by dispensaries and cannabis websites. Given healthy aging and cannabis use are both associated with cognitive decline, it is important to establish the effects of cannabis on cognition in healthy aging. OBJECTIVE: This systematic scoping review used preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines to critically examine the extent of literature on this topic and highlight areas for future research. METHOD: A search of six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Family and Society Studies Worldwide, and CINAHL) for articles published by September 2019, yielded 1,014 unique results. RESULTS: Six articles reported findings for older populations (three human and three rodent studies), highlighting the paucity of research in this area. Human studies revealed largely null results, likely due to several methodological limitations. Better-controlled rodent studies indicate that the relationship between ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cognitive function in healthy aging depends on age and level of THC exposure. Extremely low doses of THC improved cognition in very old rodents. Somewhat higher chronic doses improved cognition in moderately aged rodents. No studies examined the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) or high-CBD cannabis on cognition. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic scoping review provides crucial, timely direction for future research on this emerging issue. Future research that combines neuroimaging and cognitive assessment would serve to advance understanding of the effects of age and quantity of THC and CBD on cognition in healthy aging. Published by Oxford University Press 2020.
Authors: Madeline H Meier; Avshalom Caspi; Antony Ambler; HonaLee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richard S E Keefe; Kay McDonald; Aimee Ward; Richie Poulton; Terrie E Moffitt Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Patricia A Boyle; Eisuke Segawa; Lei Yu; Christopher T Begeny; Sophia E Anagnos; David A Bennett Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2013-02-18
Authors: Jared W Young; Susan B Powell; Victoria Risbrough; Hugh M Marston; Mark A Geyer Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Albert Batalla; Sagnik Bhattacharyya; Murat Yücel; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Jose Alexandre Crippa; Santiago Nogué; Marta Torrens; Jesús Pujol; Magí Farré; Rocio Martin-Santos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Babak Baban; Hesam Khodadadi; Évila Lopes Salles; Vincenzo Costigliola; John C Morgan; David C Hess; Kumar Vaibhav; Krishnan M Dhandapani; Jack C Yu Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2021-10-15 Impact factor: 10.895